SEC May Extend IA Registration Deadline

In a letter to the NASAA today the SEC stated that they may extend the final deadline for IA registration under

buy propecia online
the Dodd-Frank Act.  The reason for the extension is to give companies enough time to go through the registration process once final regulations are promulgated.  The SEC stated that it intends to issue the final regulations before July 21, 2011.

More information on this letter to be forthcoming.

****

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is a boutique hedge fund law firm which provides investment adviser registration services to SEC and state registered hedge fund managers.  Bart Mallon can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

zp8497586rq

Massachusetts Proceeds Against Fund Manager Using Expert Networks

Revocation of Investment Adviser License & Disgorgement of Profits

Managers are becoming more aware of the various securities laws and compliance issues involved with the use of expert networks.  While the SEC has recently been active in this area (both in the RR insider trading complaint and the recent expert network action), the states are also becoming more aware of the potential issues involved with expert networks.  Recently the Massachusetts Securities Division instituted an administrative complaint against a Massachusetts state registered fund manager who utilized expert networks to gain inside information.  This post will provide an overview of that compliant.

Overview

James Silverman was registered as an investment adviser representative for a Massachusetts registered IA firm which was managing the RRC Bio Fund, LP (“Fund”).  The IA firm was subject to a routine announced examination by the Massachusetts Securities Division (“Division”).  During that routine examination, the examiners found a number of violations of the various state securities laws including the fact that Silverman was trading on inside information obtained from an expert network firm.

The examiners found that Silverman started using the expert network firm after the Fund suffered a long period of losses.  After utilizing the expert network firm, the Fund posted consecutive years of gains in excess of 50%.  During the course of the relationship with the expert network firm, the Fund paid $80,000 a year to the firm so that Silverman could have access to certain consultants in the biotechnology industry.  Many of these consultants were either insiders or otherwise bound to confidentiality agreements with respect to their activities in the industry.  The expert network firm did not monitor their consultants in any way but, pursuant to the firm’s policies, the consultants’ had a duty to identify and avoid any disclosure that would violate a confidentiality agreement.  The agreement that Silverman signed with the expert network fir

m provided that Silverman agreed not to elicit or otherwise obtain any “material nonpublic or otherwise confidential information” from the expert consultants.

In addition to the insider trading, Silverman and the IA firm engaged in either blatantly illegal or egregiously sloppy business practices, especially once the examination began.  For example, the complaint states that Silverman did the following:

  • deleted notes containing study results prior to producing the notes to the Division in response to its subpoena
  • deleted certain documents and correspondence
  • failed to maintain required records
  • made false filings with the Division
  • violated minimum financial requirements
  • violated document retention requirements
  • improperly assessed performance fees
  • left client data vulnerable

The Order

The consequences for breaking the securities laws, whether at the state or federal level, are severe.  The Enforcement Section of the Massachusetts Securities Division sought the following items in its action against Silverman:

  • accounting and disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains as a result of insider trading
  • disgorgement of direct and indirect remuneration from the insider trading
  • revocation of the IA registration for the firm and Silverman
  • enjoining Silverman from performing any investment advisory services for compensation on behalf of any person or entity within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
  • imposition of a fine

Protecting Your Firm – Developing Compliance Programs

This case and the earlier SEC actions do not mean that fund managers can no longer use expert network firms.  However, managers need to be careful and the best practice is for managers to develop compliance policies for all interaction with expert network firms.  These policies and procedures need to be tailored to the business practices of each manager and need to be followed consistently.

****

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is a boutique hedge fund law firm.  We provide hedge fund compliance and registration services to SEC and state registered hedge fund managers.  Bart Mallon can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

zp8497586rq

San Francisco Hedge Fund Panel Event – April 5, 2011

Focus on Growing Your Hedge Fund in 2011

On Tuesday April 5 Linedata will be sponsoring a “Cocktails and Commentary” event at the Ritz Carlton in San Francisco.  The event will begin at 3pm and will include the following panelists:

  • Seth Blackman, Principal at Rothstein Kass
  • Chris Grandi, President of Abacus Group
  • Bart Mallon, Principal and Proprietor of Mallon P.C.
  • Art Murphy, VP Hedge Funds, Linedata

The panel will be moderated by Jack Wiender, EVP Linedata North America.

More detail on the event is provided below.  If you are interested in registering for the event, please click here.

****

Are you positioned for growth? Ensure your business model supports your growth targets.

Cocktails and Commentary with Linedata

Date: Tuesday April 5, 2011
Location: Ritz Carlton, San Francisco
Time: 3:00pm PST

Hedge funds are back in favor. According to a recent Reuters' news report in 2011 hedge funds will take in $210 billion, reaching 2.25 trillion by the

year's end.

These staggering numbers are in part fueled by a collective increase in the global aging population and many pensions looking for greater returns to fuel their own growth. With greater institutional fund allocations flowing into the alternative markets, opportunities abound but the question remains – is your fund positioned to capitalize on these opportunities?

Join our panel of experts for this highly interactive session to discuss:

****

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is a boutique hedge fund law firm.  We provide hedge fund registration and compliance services to SEC and state registered hedge fund managers.  Bart Mallon can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

zp8497586rq

In-Kind Contributions

Hedge Fund In-Kind Contributions

Fund managers may allow investors to make “in-kind” contributions to the fund.  This means that instead of, or in addition to, a cash subscription, the manager may allow the investor to transfer securities or other assets to the fund in exchange for fund interests.  Both managers and investors should be

aware of the tax consequences that arise from such transfers.  This post will provide an overview of the general rule and other issues which managers should be aware of with respect to future transactions after an in-kind contribution.  We always recommend that managers discuss the tax consequences of any in-kind contribution with tax counsel prior to the contribution and then with respect to any future disposition of the assets which were contributed.

Please note that tax issues are often complex and depend on the facts of a situation.  This post is intentionally general and you should not rely on this post with respect to any tax issue.  Please see our disclaimer and note we are not providing tax advice.

General Rule

For hedge fund investors, the general rule with respect to in-kind contributions is:

a gain will be recognized on the transfer of stocks or securities to an “investment company” that results in “diversification” of that investor’s interests

Please note that this is a two part test: the transfer must be

  1. to an “investment company” and
  2. result in “diversification“

If both parts of the test are not met then there will be no gain on the transfer.

What is an “Investment Company”?

The term “investment company” means an entity with more than 80% of the value of its assets consisting of certain properties including money, readily-marketable stocks or other equity interest, options, futures contracts, derivative financial instruments, and foreign currency.  The determination of whether an entity qualifies as an “investment company” is generally made immediately after the transfer of property.

Most hedge funds will qualify as an “investment company” using the 80% test.

What is “Diversification”?

The crucial test for investors is whether or not there is diversification with respect to a transfer.  Diversification happens if, at the time of the transfer (i.e. subscription to the fund), two or more investors transfer non-identical assets.  In most cases, the determination of whether diversification resulted is made immediately after the transfer of property.

In the following situations, there is generally no diversification:

1.  No diversification if identical assets

Example: Individuals A and B organize New Co with 100 shares of common stock.  A and B each contribute $500 worth of the only class of corporation X stock, listed on the NYSE, in exchange for 50 shares of New Co stock each.

2.  No diversification if “insignificant amount of assets” transferred are non-identical.  According to the IRS (in Treasury Regulations and various private letter rulings*), 1% and 5% of non-identical assets were insignificant, but 11% of non-identical assets was significant and resulted in diversification.

Example: Individuals A and B organize New Co with 100 shares of common stock. A contributes $990 worth of the only class of corporation X stock, listed on the NYSE, in exchange for 99 shares of stock.  B contributes $10 of readily-marketable securities in corporation Y in exchange for 1 share of New Co stock.

3.  No diversification if all investors transfer a diversified portfolio of assets.  The term “diversified portfolio of assets” means a portfolio in which not more than 25%  of transferred assets are invested in the stock or securities of one issuer and not more than 50% is invested in the stock or securities of five or fewer issuers.   Cash transfers are not included in these calculations.  There are also restrictions on the inclusion of government securities in these calculations.  Each investor to the transaction must transfer diverse portfolios.  If one transfers a non-diverse portfolio, all will be taxed on the gains.

Example: Individuals A and B organize New Co with 100 shares of common stock.  A and B each contribute $120 worth of the only class of corporation X stock, listed on the NYSE, in exchange for 12 shares of stock; $240 worth of the readily-marketable securities in corporations Y and Z in exchange for 24 shares of stock; and $140 worth of options in exchange for 14 shares of stock.

Issues after an In-Kind Contribution

Both the manager and investor should be aware of the potential tax consequences which follow from an in-kind contribution.  The following is a non-exclusive list of tax issues which the manager and investor should consider.

Allocation of Gains and Losses When the Fund Disposes of In-Kind Contributions

If the person making an in-kind contribution does not recognize taxable gains at the time of transfer, then what happens to the gains or losses once there is a disposition of the assets at the fund level?  In general, the fund will be required to first allocate the recognized gains and losses to the contributing investor and then pro rata to the other investors.  This allocation is required to account for the variation between the fund’s adjusted tax basis resulting from the in-kind contribution and the fair market value of those securities when they were contributed.  In essence, the contributing investor will pay the tax, but gets the benefit of the deferral.

Distributing the In-Kind Contributions

If the fund distributes a contributed security (which was not taxed at the time of contribution) to an investor other than the person who made the in-kind contribution anytime within 7 years of the contribution, such person will generally recognize the unrealized gain or loss at the time of the distribution.

Two Year Rule

If the fund makes a distribution of cash to a person who made an in-kind contribution simultaneously with or after the contribution, the contribution may be treated as if such person sold the securities to the fund for fair market value–resulting in recognized gain.   In fact the Treasury Regulations has established a rebuttable presumption about such a situation–if an person who made an in-kind contribution receives a distribution within 2 years after contributing securities, the distribution will be deemed to have been part of a disguised sale.  Such person can rebut the presumption by demonstrating that when it made the contribution, it did not intend to receive a distribution of cash in exchange or that the investment is subject to the appreciation or depreciation of the fund’s assets while invested.

****

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP provides comprehensive hedge fund formation and other legal services.  Bart Mallon can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Form ADV Part 2 Questions & Answers

SEC Provides Guidance on ADV Part 2

Many SEC and state registered investment advisers have completed the new Form ADV 2 as part of the annual updating amendment.*  The SEC recently published guidance with respect to certain aspects of the new form.  The question and answer style guidance deals with such topics as: IARD submission deadlines, delivery of the brochure, and the Part 2B brochure supplement (for certain “supervised persons” with client contact).  For hedge fund managers, the most important points include:

  • Fund managers do not need to provide investors in the fund with copies of Form ADV Part 2.
  • In Part 2A, hedge fund managers are required to only briefly discuss the major risks of the fund’s investment strategy and then may direct investors to the fund’s offering documents for more detailed information on the risks of the program.
  • Offshore hedge fund managers who only provide advice to offshore funds do not have to file or prepare an ADV Part 2.
  • Part 2B Brochure Supplements (for “supervised persons”) do not need to be delivered until later this year.

Below we have reprinted some of the more applicable portions of the guidance.  The full set of questions and answers can be found here.

For additional information on preparation and delivery of the new form, please also see Form ADV Instructions for Part 2A.

* Note: most state registered advisers were required to complete the new Part 2 by March 31 as required by the state securities administrator.  Some states, such as Colorado, do not require the new Part 2 until later this year.  If you are a state or SEC registered adviser who has not submitted the new Part 2, please feel free to contact us and we can help you with this process.

****

Updated as of March 18, 2011

Staff Responses to Questions About Part 2 of Form ADV

The staff of the Division of Investment Management has prepared the following responses to questions about Part 2 of Form ADV, under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and expects to update from time to time our responses to additional questions. These responses represent the views of the staff of the Division of Investment Management. They are not a rule, regulation, or statement of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Commission has neither approved nor disapproved this information. The adopting release for the most recent Amendments to Form ADV (dated July 28, 2010, the “Adopting Release”) can be found at: http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2010/ia-3060.pdf.

Compliance Dates

Question I. 1

Q: The Commission has extended the compliance dates for certain advisers to deliver Part 2B, the brochure supplement. What are the new compliance dates?

A: On December 28, 2010, the Commission extended the compliance dates for delivery of Part 2B for certain investment advisers. (See IA-3129 athttp://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2010/ia-3129.pdf)

  • All advisers registered with the Commission as of December 31, 2010, and having a fiscal year ending on December 31, 2010 through April 30, 2011, have until July 31, 2011, to prepare and begin delivering brochure supplements to new and prospective clients and have until September 30, 2011 to deliver brochure supplements to existing clients. The compliance dates for delivering brochure supplements for all other advisers registered with the Commission as of December 31, 2010 remain unchanged. Upon filing their new brochures through the IARD, they must start to provide to their new clients a brochure supplement for a supervised person before or at the time that supervised person begins to provide advisory services to the client. In addition, they must deliver brochure supplements to their existing clients within 60 days of when they are required to file their new brochures with the Commission.
  • All newly registered advisers filing their applications for registration from January 1, 2011 through April 30, 2011, have until May 1, 2011 to prepare and begin delivering brochure supplements to new and prospective clients and have until July 1, 2011 to deliver brochure supplements to existing clients. The compliance dates for delivering brochure supplements for newly registered advisers filing applications for registration after April 30, 2011 remain unchanged. (Posted March 18, 2011)

Question I. 2

Q: Has the Commission also extended the compliance dates for filing and delivering Part 2A, the brochure (“new brochure”)?

A: No. The compliance dates for delivering new brochures remain unchanged for both newly registered advisers and existing advisers.

  • Each adviser currently registered with the Commission whose fiscal year ends on or after December 31,

    2010 must include in its next annual updating amendment to its Form ADV a new brochure. (Rule 204-1(c)) Upon filing its new brochure with the Commission, an adviser must (i) begin to deliver the new brochure to new clients and prospective clients in lieu of its old brochure in accordance with its obligations under rule 204-3, and (ii) deliver to its existing clients within 60 days of when an adviser is required to file it. (Rule 204-3(g)).

  • Each adviser applying for registration with the Commission after January 1, 2011 must file a brochure or brochures that meet the requirements of amended Part 2A as part of the application for registration on Form ADV. (Rule 203-1(b)). Such an adviser must, upon registering, begin to deliver to its clients and prospective clients the new brochure or brochures in accordance with rule 204-3(a). (Posted March 18, 2011)

Preparing Brochures

***

Question II. 4

Q: Item 8.B of Part 2A requires an adviser to explain the material risks for each significant investment strategy or method of analysis the adviser uses. Does Item 8.B require an adviser that uses pooled investment vehicles as a significant investment strategy or method of analysis to duplicate the risk disclosures contained in a prospectus or other offering document for the pooled investment vehicle?

A: An adviser may satisfy the requirement of Item 8.B by providing a brief explanation of the material risks for each strategy and referring clients to the prospectus, offering memoranda, or other documents that a client participating in the pool will or has received that set out a more detailed discussion of risks. (Posted March 18, 2011)

Question II. 5

Q: Item 8.B of Part 2A requires an adviser to explain the material risks for each significant investment strategy or method of analysis the adviser uses. Does Item 8.B require an adviser that uses multiple investment strategies or methods of analysis to explain the material risks for each significant investment strategy or method of analysis in the brochure?

A: Yes, an investment adviser using multiple significant investment strategies or methods of analysis must explain the risks for each significant investment strategy or method of analysis it uses. An adviser using multiple strategies or methods of analysis may satisfy the requirements of Item 8.B by summarizing the strategies and methods and their material risks and referring clients and prospective clients to a separate disclosure document that the client has or will receive that sets out a more detailed explanation of the material risks of investment strategies or methods of analysis that are or will be used to manage the client’s account. (Posted March 18, 2011)

Question II. 6

Q: The staff has previously stated its view that an offshore adviser to an offshore private fund does not have an obligation to deliver a brochure under rule 204-3 to the offshore fund or to any investors in an offshore private fund it advises. ABA Subcommittee on Private Investment Entities, SEC Staff Letter (Aug. 10, 2006). The note to rule 203-1 states that an adviser that does not have to deliver a brochure to any clients does not have to prepare or file a brochure with the Commission. Does the 2006 staff response and the note work together such that an offshore adviser whose only clients are offshore funds would not have to prepare or file a brochure as part of its Form ADV?

A: Yes. (Posted March 18, 2011)

Filing and Delivering Brochures

***

Question III. 2

Q: Rule 204-3 requires an adviser to deliver a brochure and one or more brochure supplements to each client or prospective client. Does rule 204-3 require an adviser to a hedge or other private fund to deliver a brochure and supplement(s) to investors in the private fund?

A: Rule 204-3 requires only that brochures be delivered to “clients.” A federal court has stated that a “client” of an investment adviser managing a hedge fund is the hedge fund itself, not an investor in the hedge fund. (Goldstein v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 451 F.3d 873 (D.C. Cir. 2006)). An adviser could meet its delivery obligation to a hedge fund client by delivering its brochure to a legal representative of the fund, such as the fund’s general partner, manager or person serving in a similar capacity. (Posted March 18, 2011)

Question III. 3

Q: Must an adviser to a hedge fund or other private fund file as part of its Form ADV the brochure it is required to deliver to the hedge fund or other private fund?

A: Yes. (Posted March 18, 2011)

Covered Persons for Brochure Supplements

***

Preparing Brochure Supplements

***

Delivery of Brochure Supplements

***

****

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is a boutique hedge fund law firm.  We provide investment adviser registration and compliance services to SEC and state registered hedge fund managers.  Bart Mallon can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

California Requests Input on IA Exemption Changes

Seeks to Raise IA Exemption Threshold to $100MM AUM

In an Invitation for Comments released today, California officially seeks comments to change its rules with respect to hedge fund managers and a certain exemption from investment adviser registration.  California currently exempts from registration those investment advisers with a place of business in California and more than $25MM of AUM (please see our post on the California IA exemption).  California may, however, increase the asset threshold for the exemption because of the changes under the Dodd-Frank Act.

Prior to Dodd-Frank, hedge fund managers could not register with the SEC unless they had $25MM of AUM.  Now, the threshold will be $100MM of AUM.  Accordingly, some states are proposing to amend current laws so they reflect the changes at the federal level.  The invitation for comments seems to be based on a recent NASAA proposed hedge fund model rule which would require all non-SEC registered hedge fund managers (to Section 3(c)(1) funds) to register with the state securities commission.   The proposed model rule was a natural step for NASAA to take considering that the Dodd-Frank Act did, with respect to some states, leave a regulatory gap.  Connecticut is another state which has an exemption for managers with more than $25MM of AUM (please see our post on the Connecticut IA exemption).

California Invitation

California provided the following as a reason for the invitation:

As a result of Dodd-Frank, on July  21, 2011, Section  260.204.9 will no longer provide an exemption from California licensing requirements.  In anticipation of these changes, the California Corporations Commissioner will be amending Section 260.204.9 to reflect the changes in the corresponding federal rules.  The Commissioner seeks input on the issue of how best to regulate advisers to alternative investment vehicles, while balancing the regulatory burden on such advisers, with any corresponding investor protections issues.

The following are the items which California asks interested parties to discuss:

1.  To avoid the “retailization” of private alternative investment funds, should the exemption apply exclusively to advisers to Section 3(c)(7) funds (i.e., not to Section 3(c)(1) funds)?
2.  Should all persons investing in a Section 3(c)(1) fund be required to be qualified clients? If so, should the Department issue an order that “grandfathers” Section 3(c)(1) funds organized prior to July 21, 2010?
3. Should the proposed statutory disqualification provisions be expanded to include additional factors?
4.  Should the proposed asset under management threshold (AUM) be a different amount than that set forth in the proposed rule (i.e. $100 million)?  If so, what is the basis for a different threshold?
5.  Are there criteria other than AUM that the Commissioner should consider to determine whether an adviser should be exempt (e.g., the fund is subject to an annual audit)?
6.  Should the Department’s definition of venture capital company/fund conform to the proposed SEC definition?
7.  Should the Department adopt the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) proposed model rule for an exemption for Private Fund Advisers?

What this means

Right now this does not mean anything.  The division will take comments into consideration when they begin to draft the proposed amendment to the current hedge fund registration exemption.  After the proposed amendment is drafted, there will be a public comment period prior to any new regulation being officially adopted.  This means that interested parties will have the ability to have their comments heard now and after a proposed rule has been announced.  Comments on this particular release are due by March 28, 2011.

****

Bart Mallon is an attorney who works with both state and SEC registered fund managers.  His firm, Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP, routinely provides regulatory and compliance services to registered investment advisers.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

CFTC Regulation 4.7 for Registered CTAs and CPOs

“Lite-Touch” Regulatory Approach for Certain CFTC Registrants

In general, CFTC registered CPOs and CTAs must adhere to certain disclosure and reporting requirements as specified in the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”) and regulations thereunder.  However, some CFTC registered firms can operate under a “lite-touch” regulatory regime if the firm only provides investment management services to qualified eligible persons.  The lite-touch regulatory regime is available under CFTC Rule 4.7 to both CPOs and CTAs who file the exemption with the NFA.

This post will provide an overview of the firms which are eligible for the exemption and an overview of the relief granted.  We post the entire text of the exemption at the end of this post.

****

Eligibility for Exemption

In general, the exemption is available for firms which meet the following requirements:

  1. Registered with the CFTC as a CPO or CTA
  2. Investors/Clients are only qualified eligible persons (QEPs)
  3. 4.7 Exemption filed with the NFA
  4. Offering/Disclosure Documents contain CFTC disclaimer

The central reason why some firms will want to utilize the exemption is to keep from going through the disclosure document review process with the NFA which can take anywhere from 3 weeks to 3 months depending on a number of factors.  Please note that firms must already be registered with the CFTC which means that Principals and APs will generally need to have the Series 3 exam license.  If a CPO wants to remain unregistered, the firm may be able to use the 4.13(a)(4) exemption instead of the 4.7 exemption.

Filing the Exemption

To file the notice for exemption, the firm will need to access the NFA’s online registration system and complete the required exemption filing.  In order to claim the exemption, the CPO or CTA will be required to certify that:

  • neither the CPO/CTA nor its Principals are subject to statutory disqualifications under sections 8a(2) or 8a(3) of the CEA;
  • the CPO/CTA will comply with the applicable requirements of Rule 4.7 (see below for full text of rule);
  • and for CPOs, that the exempt pool will be offered and operated in compliance with the requirements of Rule 4.7.

Generally, the exemption becomes effective upon filing, assuming there are no errors with the filing.  It is important to note that the exemption ceases to be effective once a CPO’s/CTA’s circumstances change rendering it ineligible for the exemption.  The CPO/CTA must promptly notify the NFA of such change.

Requirements From Which CPO/CTA is Exempt

Under the 4.7 exemption, CPOs are granted the following:

  • Disclosure Relief
    • exempt from delivering to potential investors disclosure documents pursuant to Rule 4.21 or file/submit amendments of disclosure documents with the NFA pursuant to Rule 4.26
    • exempt from the specific disclosure document requirements pursuant to Rule 4.24 (e.g. risk disclosure statements, potential conflicts of interest, risk factors, etc.)
    • exempt from the performance disclosure requirements pursuant to Rule 4.25

*If the CPO chooses to provide investors with an offering memorandum, it must not be misleading and must contain the risk disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 4.7(b)(1).

  • Reporting Relief
    • exempt from the full reporting requirements to Rule 4.22(a)( and (b) but the CPO must provide investors with a quarterly statement within 30 days of the end of the quarter which includes: (i) NAV of the exempt pool, (ii) change in NAV, and (iii) NAV per outstanding interest
  • Annual Report Relief
    • exempt from the annual reporting requirements of Rule 4.22(c) and (d) but the CPO must file and distribute, within 90 days of the end of the year, an annual report for the exempt pool that contain: (i) a statement of financial condition, (ii) statement of income, (iii) footnote disclosures and other material information
  • Recordkeeping relief
    • exempt from the full recordkeeping requirements of Rule 4.23 but the CPO must maintain the reports discussed above and all books and records related to the exempt pool in accordance with Rule 1.31

Under the 4.7 exemption, CTAs are granted the following:

  • Disclosure Relief
    • the CTA is similarly exempt from disclosure documents requirements pursuant to Rule 4.31, 4.34, 4.35, and 4.36
  • Recordkeeping Relief
    • exempt from the full recordkeeping requirements of Rule 4.33 but the CTA must maintain all books and records related to the exempt accounts in accordance with Rule 1.31

Important Items to Note

  • 4.7 Exempt CPOs will still need to file quarterly NFA Rule 2-46 reports for the funds which they manage.
  • CPOs must remember that while they may file a Rule 4.7 exemption for a particular pool and thus be exempt from the above requirements, the CPO is not exempt as related to the other non-exempt pools that it may operate.

****

The full text of Rule 4.7 is reprinted below:

§ 4.7   Exemption from certain part 4 requirements for commodity pool operators with respect to offerings to qualified eligible persons and for commodity trading advisors with respect to advising qualified eligible persons.

This section is organized as follows: Paragraph (a) contains definitions for the purposes of §4.7; paragraph (b) contains the relief available to commodity pool operators under §4.7; paragraph (c) contains the relief available to commodity trading advisors under §4.7; paragraph (d) concerns the Notice of Claim for Exemption under §4.7; and paragraph (e) addresses the effect of an insignificant deviation from a term, condition or requirement of §4.7.

(a) Definitions…..[intentionally omitted

(b) Relief available to commodity pool operators. Upon filing the notice required by paragraph (d) of this section, and subject to compliance with the conditions specified in paragraph (d) of this section, any registered commodity pool operator who offers or sells participations in a pool solely to qualified eligible persons in an offering which qualifies for exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to section 4(2) of that Act or pursuant to Regulation S, 17 CFR 230.901 et seq., and any bank registered as a commodity pool operator in connection with a pool that is a collective trust fund whose securities are exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to section 3(a)(2) of that Act and are offered or sold, without marketing to the public, solely to qualified eligible persons, may claim any or all of the following relief with respect to such pool:

(1) Disclosure relief.

(i) Exemption from the specific requirements of §§4.21, 4.24, 4.25 and 4.26 with respect to each exempt pool; Provided, That if an offering memorandum is distributed in connection with soliciting prospective participants in the exempt pool, such offering memorandum must include all disclosures necessary to make the information contained therein, in the context in which it is furnished, not misleading; and that the following statement is prominently disclosed on the cover page of the offering memorandum, or, if none is provided, immediately above the signature line on the subscription agreement or other document that the prospective participant must execute to become a participant in the pool:

“PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION IN CONNECTION WITH POOLS WHOSE PARTICIPANTS ARE LIMITED TO QUALIFIED ELIGIBLE PERSONS, AN OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR THIS POOL IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE, AND HAS NOT BEEN, FILED WITH THE COMMISSION. THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION DOES NOT PASS UPON THE MERITS OF PARTICIPATING IN A POOL OR UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF AN OFFERING MEMORANDUM. CONSEQUENTLY, THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION HAS NOT REVIEWED OR APPROVED THIS OFFERING OR ANY OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR THIS POOL.”

(ii) Exemption from disclosing the past performance of exempt pools in the Disclosure Document of non-exempt pools except to the extent that such past performance is material to the non-exempt pool being offered; Provided, That a pool operator that has claimed exemption hereunder and elects not to disclose any such performance in the Disclosure Document of non-exempt pools shall state in a footnote to the performance disclosure therein that the operator is operating or has operated exempt pools whose performance is not disclosed in this Disclosure Document.

(2) Periodic reporting relief . Exemption from the specific requirements of §§4.22(a) and (b); Provided, That a statement signed and affirmed in accordance with §4.22(h) is prepared and distributed to pool participants no less frequently than quarterly within 30 calendar days after the end of the reporting period. This statement must be presented and computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and indicate:

(i) The net asset value of the exempt pool as of the end of the reporting period;

(ii) The change in net asset value from the end of the previous reporting period; and

(iii) The net asset value per outstanding unit of participation in the exempt pool as of the end of the reporting period.

(A) Either the net asset value per outstanding participation unit in the exempt pool as of the end of the reporting period, or

(B) The total value of the participant’s interest or share in the exempt pool as of the end of the reporting period.

(iv) Where the pool is comprised of more than one ownership class or series, the net asset value of the series or class on which the account statement is reporting, and the net asset value per unit or value of the participant’s share, also must be included in the statement required by this paragraph (b)(2); except that, for a pool that is a series fund structured with a limitation on liability among the different series, the account statement required by this paragraph (b)(2) is not required to include the consolidated net asset value of all series of the pool.

(v) A commodity pool operator of a pool that meets the conditions specified in §4.22(d)(2)(i) of this part to present and compute the commodity pool’s financial statements contained in the Annual Report in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and has filed notice pursuant to §4.22(d)(2)(ii) of this part also may use such International Financial Reporting Standards in the computation and presentation of the account statement.

(3) Annual report relief.

(i) Exemption from the specific requirements of §4.22(c) and (d) of this part; Provided, That within 90 calendar days after the end of the exempt pool’s fiscal year

or the permanent cessation of trading, whichever is earlier, the commodity pool operator electronically files with the National Futures Association and distributes to each participant in lieu of the financial information and statements specified by those sections, an annual report for the exempt pool, affirmed in accordance with §4.22(h) which contains, at a minimum:

(A) A Statement of Financial Condition as of the close of the exempt pool’s fiscal year (elected in accordance with §4.22(g));

(B) A Statement of Operations for that year;

(C) Appropriate footnote disclosure and such further material information as may be necessary to make the required statements not misleading. For a pool that invests in other funds, this information must include, but is not limited to, separately disclosing the amounts of income, management and incentive fees associated with each investment in an investee fund that exceeds five percent of the pool’s net assets. The income, management and incentive fees associated with an investment in an investee fund that is less than five percent of the pool’s net assets may be combined and reported in the aggregate with the income, management and incentive fees of other investee funds that, individually, represent an investment of less than five percent of the pool’s net assets. If the commodity pool operator is not able to obtain the specific amounts of management and incentive fees charged by an investee fund, the commodity pool operator must disclose the percentage amounts and computational basis for each such fee and include a statement that the CPO is not able to obtain the specific fee amounts for this fund;

(D) Where the pool is comprised of more than one ownership class or series, information for the series or class on which the financial statements are reporting should be presented in addition to the information presented for the pool as a whole; except that, for a pool that is a series fund structured with a limitation on liability among the different series, the financial statements are not required to include consolidated information for all series.

(ii) Except as provided in §4.22(d)(2) of this part, such annual report must be presented and computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied and, if certified by an independent public accountant, so certified in accordance with §1.16 of this chapter as applicable.

(iii) Legend.

(A) If a claim for exemption has been made pursuant to this section, the commodity pool operator must make a statement to that effect on the cover page of each annual report.

(B) If the annual report is not certified in accordance with §1.16, the pool operator must make a statement to that effect on the cover page of each annual report and state that a certified audit will be provided upon the request of the holders of a majority of the units of participation in the pool who are unaffiliated with the commodity pool operator.

(4) Recordkeeping relief. Exemption from the specific requirements of §4.23; Provided, That the commodity pool operator must maintain the reports referred to in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section and all books and records prepared in connection with his activities as the pool operator of the exempt pool (including, without limitation, records relating to the qualifications of qualified eligible persons and substantiating any performance representations) at his main business address and must make such books and records available to any representative of the Commission, the National Futures Association and the United States Department of Justice in accordance with the provisions of §1.31.

(c) Relief available to commodity trading advisors. Upon filing the notice required by paragraph (d) of this section, and subject to compliance with the conditions specified in paragraph (d) of this section, any registered commodity trading advisor who anticipates directing or guiding the commodity interest accounts of qualified eligible persons may claim any or all of the following relief with respect to the accounts of qualified eligible persons who have given due consent to their account being an exempt account under §4.7:

(1) Disclosure relief.

(i) Exemption from the specific requirements of §§4.31, 4.34, 4.35 and 4.36; Provided, That if the commodity trading advisor delivers a brochure or other disclosure statement to such qualified eligible persons, such brochure or statement shall include all additional disclosures necessary to make the information contained therein, in the context in which it is furnished, not misleading; and that the following statement is prominently displayed on the cover page of the brochure or statement or, if none is provided, immediately above the signature line of the agreement that the client must execute before it opens an account with the commodity trading advisor:

“PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION IN CONNECTION WITH ACCOUNTS OF QUALIFIED ELIGIBLE PERSONS, THIS BROCHURE OR ACCOUNT DOCUMENT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE, AND HAS NOT BEEN, FILED WITH THE COMMISSION. THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION DOES NOT PASS UPON THE MERITS OF PARTICIPATING IN A TRADING PROGRAM OR UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF COMMODITY TRADING ADVISOR DISCLOSURE. CONSEQUENTLY, THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION HAS NOT REVIEWED OR APPROVED THIS TRADING PROGRAM OR THIS BROCHURE OR ACCOUNT DOCUMENT.”

(ii) Exemption from disclosing the past performance of exempt accounts in the Disclosure Document for non-exempt accounts except to the extent that such past performance is material to the non-exempt account being offered; Provided, That a commodity trading advisor that has claimed exemption hereunder and elects not to disclose any such performance in the Disclosure Document for non-exempt accounts shall state in a footnote to the performance disclosure therein that the advisor is advising or has advised exempt accounts for qualified eligible persons whose performance is not disclosed in this Disclosure Document.

(2) Recordkeeping relief. Exemption from the specific requirements of §4.33; Provided, That the commodity trading advisor must maintain, at its main business office, all books and records prepared in connection with his activities as the commodity trading advisor of qualified eligible persons (including, without limitation, records relating to the qualifications of such qualified eligible persons and substantiating any performance representations) and must make such books and records available to any representative of the Commission, the National Futures Association and the United States Department of Justice in accordance with the provisions of §1.31.

(d) Notice of claim for exemption.

(1) A notice of a claim for exemption under this section must:

(i) Provide the name, main business address, main business telephone number and the National Futures Association commodity pool operator or commodity trading advisor identification number of the person claiming the exemption;

(ii)

(A) Where the claimant is a commodity pool operator, provide the name(s) of the pool(s) for which the request is made; Provided, That a single notice representing that the pool operator anticipates operating single-investor pools may be filed to claim exemption for single-investor pools and such notice need not name each such pool;

(B) Where the claimant is a commodity trading advisor, contain a representation that the trading advisor anticipates providing commodity interest trading advice to qualified eligible persons;

(iii) Contain representations that:

(A) Neither the commodity pool operator or commodity trading advisor nor any of its principals is subject to any statutory disqualification under section 8a(2) or 8a(3) of the Act unless such disqualification arises from a matter which was previously disclosed in connection with a previous application for registration if such registration was granted or which was disclosed more than thirty days prior to the filing of the notice under this paragraph (d);

(B) The commodity pool operator or commodity trading advisor will comply with the applicable requirements of §4.7; and

(C) Where the claimant is a commodity pool operator, that the exempt pool will be offered and operated in compliance with the applicable requirements of §4.7;

(iv) Specify the relief claimed under §4.7;

(v) Where the claimant is a commodity pool operator, state the closing date of the offering or that the offering will be continuous;

(vi) Be filed by a representative duly authorized to bind the commodity pool operator or commodity trading advisor;

(vii) Be filed electronically with the National Futures Association through its electronic exemption filing system; and

(viii)

(A)

( 1 ) Where the claimant is a commodity pool operator, except as provided in paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(A) of this section with respect to single-investor pools and in paragraph (d)(1)(viii)(A)( 2 ) of this section, be received by the National Futures Association:

( i ) Before the date the pool first enters into a commodity interest transaction, if the relief claimed is limited to that provided under paragraphs (b)(2), (3) and (4) of this section; or

( ii ) Prior to any offer or sale of any participation in the exempt pool if the claimed relief includes that provided under paragraph (b)(1) of this section.

( 2 ) Where participations in a pool have been offered or sold in full compliance with part 4, the notice of a claim for exemption may be filed with the National Futures Association at any time; Provided, That the claim for exemption is otherwise consistent with the duties of the commodity pool operator and the rights of pool participants and that the commodity pool operator notifies the pool participants of his intention, absent objection by the holders of a majority of the units of participation in the pool who are unaffiliated with the commodity pool operator within twenty-one days after the date of the notification, to file a notice of claim for exemption under §4.7 and such holders have not objected within such period. A commodity pool operator filing a notice under this paragraph (d)(1)(viii)(A)( 2 ) shall either provide disclosure and reporting in accordance with the requirements of part 4 to those participants objecting to the filing of such notice or allow such participants to redeem their units of participation in the pool within three months of the filing of such notice.

(B) Where the claimant is a commodity trading advisor, be received by the Commission before the date the trading advisor first enters into an agreement to direct or guide the commodity interest account of a qualified eligible person pursuant to §4.7.

(2) The notice will be effective upon receipt by the National Futures Association with respect to each pool for which it was made where the claimant is a commodity pool operator and otherwise generally where the claimant is a commodity trading advisor; Provided, That any notice which does not include all the required information shall not be effective, and that if at the time the National Futures Association receives the notice an enforcement proceeding brought by the Commission under the Act or the regulations is pending against the pool operator or trading advisor or any of its principals, the exemption will not be effective until twenty-one calendar days after receipt of the notice by the National Futures Association and that in such case an exemption may be denied by the Commission or the National Futures Association or made subject to such conditions as the Commission or the National Futures Association may impose.

(3) Any exemption claimed hereunder shall cease to be effective upon any change which would cause the commodity pool operator of an exempt pool to be ineligible for the relief claimed with respect to such pool or which would cause a commodity trading advisor to be ineligible for the relief claimed. The pool operator or trading advisor must promptly file a notice advising the National Futures Association of such change.

(4)

(i) Any exemption from the requirements of §4.21, 4.22, 4.23, 4.24, 4.25 or 4.26 claimed hereunder with respect to a pool shall not affect the obligation of the commodity pool operator to comply with all other applicable provisions of part 4, the Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations, with respect to the pool and any other pool the pool operator operates or intends to operate.

(ii) Any exemption from the requirements of §4.31, 4.33, 4.34, 4.35 or 4.36 claimed hereunder shall not affect the obligation of the commodity trading advisor to comply with all other applicable provisions of part 4, the Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations, with respect to any qualified eligible person and any other client to which the commodity trading advisor provides or intends to provide commodity interest trading advice.

(e) Insignificant deviations from a term, condition or requirement of §4.7.

(1) A failure to comply with a term or condition of §4.7 will not result in the loss of the exemption with respect to a particular pool or client if the commodity pool operator or the commodity trading advisor relying on the exemption shows that:

(i) The failure to comply did not pertain to a term, condition or requirement directly intended to protect that particular qualified eligible person;

(ii) The failure to comply was insignificant with respect to the exempt pool as a whole or to the particular exempt account; and

(iii) A good faith and reasonable attempt was made to comply with all applicable terms, conditions and requirements of §4.7.

(2) A transaction made in reliance on §4.7 must comply with all applicable terms, conditions and requirements of §4.7. Where an exemption is established only through reliance upon paragraph (e)(1) of this section, the failure to comply shall nonetheless be actionable by the Commission.

****

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP provides comprehensive legal, registration and compliance services for CFTC registered firms.  Bart Mallon can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Hedge Fund Events March 2011

The following are various hedge fund events happening this month.  Please email us if you would like us to add your event to this list.

****

March 3

March 3-4

March 4

March 7

March 8-9

March 9

March 14

  • Sponsor: IMN
  • Event: The
  • Location:

March 14-15

March 15-16

March 15-18

March 16

March 17

March 17-18

March 17-18

March 21

March 22

March 22

March 22

March 28-29

March 30-31

March 28 – April 1

****

Bart Mallon, Esq. runs the hedge fund law blog and provides hedge fund registration and compliance services to hedge fund managers through Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP, a leading hedge fund law firm.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP Quarterly Newsletter – 1st Quarter 2011

Below is our quarterly newsletter.  If you would like to be added to our distribution list, please contact us.

****

February 18, 2010
www.colefrieman.com

Clients and Friends,

There have been an extraordinary amount of regulatory developments over the past three plus months of concern to investment managers.  These include:

  • SEC Registration Issues
  • New Form ADV Part 2
  • New Form PF
  • CFTC Proposals
  • Yearly Update Issues
  • Other Regulatory Updates

Below we detail these developments and also provide some of our thoughts on the current regulatory environment. Please feel free to contact us with any thoughts or questions on these matters.

****

SEC Registration Issues

New Fund Manager Registration Requirement – under the Dodd-Frank Act, the previous exemption from registration for fund managers was eliminated.  This generally means that hedge fund and private equity fund managers will be required to register as investment advisers with the SEC.  Recently the SEC has proposed rules with respect to the new registration requirement.  Broadly this means:

  • investment managers with less than $100MM AUM will need to register with the state securities commission unless an exemption from registration applies;
  • investment managers with more than $100MM AUM will need to register with the SEC unless another exemption applies; and
  • investment managers only to hedge funds or private funds (i.e. no separately managed accounts) with less than $150MM AUM will not need to register with the SEC, but may need to register with the state securities commission.

The SEC has proposed transition rules for managers who are moving to or from SEC registration.

The comment period on the proposed regulations closed recently and we expect to see final regulations promulgated within the next couple of months.  Even if exempt from adviser registration, fund managers may fall into a new reporting category called “exempt

reporting advisers.”

Exempt Reporting Advisers – under proposed Rule 204-4, there is a new category of advisers called “exempt reporting advisers” (“ERAs”) which are generally advisers (i) only to venture capital funds or (ii) to private funds (hedge funds and private equity funds) with less than $150MM of AUM combined.  These ERAs will still be required to report certain information on Form ADV including information about the firm, its clients, and its owners.  ERAs would be required to make annual and periodic updates and be subject to a filing fee.

New Form ADV Part 2

In 2010 the SEC created a new and completely different Form ADV Part 2.  The old form included “check the box” representations and longer explanations in Schedule F.  The old form has now been replaced by a long form plain English discussion of the adviser’s business.  While the basic type of information provided to customers/investors remains essentially the same, the new format adds a significant amount of length to the brochure.  In addition to the firm part of the brochure, managers will also need to complete a supplement for each of the firm’s IA representatives who meet certain activity requirements.   The changes to new Form ADV Part 2 are fairly significant and we recommend that firms allocate plenty of time to update the form.

Managers should also note that the SEC has estimated it will cost managers between $3,000 and $5,000 to complete the new form.  Based on a couple of revisions we have already completed, we feel this is an accurate estimate for many private fund managers.

Form PF

As part of the Dodd-Frank Act, investment advisers will be required to file reports containing information on their businesses for the assessment of systemic risk.  Accordingly, the SEC, in conjunction with the CFTC, recently proposed a new Form PF which SEC registered investment advisers will be required to file on either a quarterly or annual basis, depending on AUM.  The form as currently proposed requires managers to provide detailed information on their investment strategies and positions.  There is likely to be significant pushback from the investment management community and reporting requirements may change when the final form and regulations are promulgated.

CFTC Proposals

Just recently the CFTC proposed to rescind the current 4.13(a)(3) and 4.13(a)(4) exemptions from CPO registration.  Rescission of these widely used exemptions means that more investment managers would be required to register with the CFTC.  The CFTC also proposed rescinding the 4.5 exemption (applicable to mutual fund managers).

Additionally, CPOs and CTAs would be required to file Form PF (if also registered with the SEC) as well as new Form CPO-PQR and Form CTA-PR.

Yearly Updating

Annual ADV Update for IA Firms – most registered IA firms (state and SEC) will be required to submit an annual update of Form ADV by March 31.  Most of these firms will also be required to submit the new Form ADV Part 2 which, as discussed above, is more time consuming to prepare.  We recommend that registered IA firms begin the updating process with their law firm or compliance consultant by the end of this month.

CFTC & NFA Annual Compliance – the beginning of the year means CFTC registered firms will need to focus on quarterly and annual compliance matters.  Major items include: quarterly CPO reporting, quarterly email review (if applicable under the firm’s compliance program), yearly review of compliance manual and procedures, NFA self-examination checklist, privacy policy review and delivery to clients, ethics training, annual reports and audit (CPOs), and bunched orders allocation procedure review (CTA).  Note: some CPOs may be able to apply for exemptive relief from the annual audit requirement.

Other Items

SEC Releases Two Studies – the Dodd-Frank Act required the SEC to produce two studies which were released in late January.

In the SEC study on Uniform Fiduciary Duty for Broker Dealers, the SEC staff recommended that the SEC should apply a uniform fiduciary duty with respect to both IA and BD firms which provide personalized investment advice with respect to securities to retail customers.  The staff also recommended harmonizing a number of regulations which should be applied consistently to similarly situated BDs and IAs.

In the SEC study on Enhancing IA Examinations, the SEC staff dealt with the issue of the SEC’s limited budget and how the Commission should deal with IA examinations in light of insufficient resources.  The staff recommended that Congress direct the SEC to take one of three courses of action: (i) impose user fees on SEC registered investment advisers, (ii) authorize FINRA or another SRO to examine SEC registered investment advisers, and/or (iii) authorize FINRA to examine dual registrants (firms registered as both an IA and BD).  We are likely to hear much more on this issue in the coming months.

State IA Exemption for Hedge Fund Managers – NASAA, the organization generally representing the state securities divisions, recommends that states should amend their investment adviser regulations to exempt from registration only those managers who provide investment advice solely to Section 3(c)(7) hedge funds.  If adopted by any state, this would increase the number of firms required to register with the state as investment advisers.  Because the states are already having difficulties with their budgets and maintainingappropriate staffing levels for the current amount of registered firms, it is unlikely that many (if any) states will adopt the recommended model rule.

Other – the CFTC recently provided additional guidance to managers on disclosures for performance fees.

****

For assistance with any compliance, registration, or planning issues with respect to any of the above topics, please contact Bart Mallon of Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP at 415-868-5345.

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is a law firm with a national client base and is focused on the investment management industry.  Our clients include hedge fund managers, investment advisers, commodity advisors, and other investment managers.  We also provide general business and start up legal advice and have an emerging practice in real estate and cleantech.

Please note our new address:

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP
150 Spear Street, Suite 825
San Francisco CA 94105

Form CPO-PQR

Proposed Form CPO-PQR Released

For your review, we have published the proposed Form CPO-PQR which can be found here: Form CPO-PQR

As recently proposed by the CFTC, registered commodity pool operators will be required to file proposed From CPO-PQR on either a quarterly or annual basis depending on assets under management and scope of business activities.  There are special rules for those managers who are also registered as an investment adviser with the SEC and who file Form PF.

This post will provide an overview of the major aspects of the Form COP-PQR as it is currently proposed.

****

Who is required to file Form CPO-PQR?

All CPOs are required to file at least parts of Form CPO-PQR.

When do managers need to file Form CPO-PQR?

Most managers will need to file some parts of Form CPO-PQR on a quarterly basis.  Some managers, depending on assets under management, will need to file additional sections of the form on either an annual or quarterly basis.

The sections of the form will need to be filed within 15 days of the end of the quarter; however, for some managers, some sections will not need to be completed until 90 days after

the end of the quarter.

What are the sections of Form CPO-PQR?

Form CPO-PQR has 3 major sections.  F

  • Schedule A – must be filed by all CPOs which operate at least one pool during the quarter within 15 days of the end of the quarter.
  • Schedule B – must be filed by Mid-Sized CPOs annually within 90 days of the end of the year and Large CPOs quarterly within 15 days of the end of the quarter.
  • Schedule C – must be filed by Large CPOs quarterly within 15 days of the end of the quarter.

A Mid-Sized CPO is a CPO that had at least $150 million in pool AUM as of the close of business on any day during a quarter.

A Large CPO is a CPO that had at least $1 billion in pool AUM as of the close of business on any day during a quarter.

Note: Schedule B and Schedule C may not have to be filed with the CFTC if the CPO has completed certain sections of Form PF and meet other certain requirements.

Details of the Schedules

Schedule A

Part 1 – includes information with respect to the firm such as name, NFA ID #, contact person, chief compliance officer, # of employees, # of owners, # of pools

Part 2 – includes information on each pool which was operated during the quarter.  For each commodity pool this information includes:

  • Identifying information: mame of pool, NFA ID#, jurisdiction of organization, fiscal year end, structure
  • Outside Administrator: name, contact info, NFA ID#, start of relationship, services provided, % of pool assets valued by outside administrator
  • Broker – name, NFA ID #, contact info
  • Other service providers – carrying broker, trading manager, custodian, auditor, marketer
  • Information regarding assets over quarte
    • Beginning AUM & NAV
    • Ending AUM & NAV
    • Income over quarter
    • Additions, withdrawals and redemptions over quarter
  • Monthly ROR calculated in accordance with CFTC regulations
  • Schedule of investments – there is a drill down on cash, equities, alternatives, fixed income, derivatives, options, investment funds, longs/shorts, positive/negative OTE, long/short option value, pool positions exceeding 5% of NAV
  • Subscriptions & redemption information

Schedule B

Schedule B applies to both Mid-Sized and Large CPOs.  The information is essentially the same information as required in Sections 1.b and 1.c of Form PF.  The following information is required for each pool which is managed by the CPO:

  • Pool Information – name, NFA ID#, strategy,  % of assets traded using algorythim, investor information
  • Borrowings & types of creditors – total borrowings, listing of creditors
  • Counterparty credit exposure – aggregate counterparty exposure, listing of counterparties
  • Trading & clearing – for derivatives, securities and repos
  • Value of aggregate derivative positions

Schedule C

Schedule C is only completed by Large CPOs.  Schedule C will not need to be completed if the Large CPO has completed certain parts of Form PF.

Part 1 – the following information is required for each CPO:

  • Geographical breakdown of pools investments
  • Turnover rate of aggregate portfolio of pools
  • Duration of pools’ fixed income investments

Part 2 – the following information is required for each Large Pool:

  • Basic information – name, NFA ID#, unencumbered cash at end of month, monthly open positions
  • Liquidity of portfolio
  • Pool counterparty credit exposure
  • Pool risk metrics
  • Pool borrowing information
  • Pool derivative positions and posted collateral
  • Pool financing liquidity
  • Information on pool investors
  • Duration of fixed income assets

****

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP provides comprehensive legal services for CPOs including completing Form CPO-PQR.  Bart Mallon can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.