Category Archives: Legal Resources

Hedge Fund Series 7 question

3 Replies

As I’ve noted in many of my posts, I will try my best to answer your questions or point you to a post within the site which discusses the subject. Below is a common question for licensed brokers who are getting into the hedge fund industry.

Question: I currently hold a series 7 agent license as well as a series 65. I am employed with a broker dealer and soon will make a job change to a hedge fund as a marketer. Can the hedge fund maintain my licenses even though they are not a broker dealer and given the fact that I do not need to have a series 7 license to market the hedge fund? I do not want my license to lapse while in the employ of the hedge fund. I do know that FINRA will hold my license for 24 months before expiring. I would like to maintain my licenses and keep them current by fulfilling my continuing education responsibilities. Please advise.

Answer: No, unfortunately the hedge fund will not be able to “hold” your license if it (or a related entity) is not a broker-dealer. Only a FINRA licensed broker-dealer will be able to “hold” your license – and by “hold” we mean that you would be registered as a representative of the broker-dealer.

This should not be confused with “parking” a license with a broker-dealer which is illegal under FINRA rules. Parking a license basically means that you are registered with a broker-dealer for no business reason other than to keep your licenses current. In the situation above, as you noted, the series 7 designation will expire two years after a U-5 has been submitted by your employing broker-dealer.

One potential way to keep the license is to stay on with your broker dealer and conduct your hedge fund selling activities through the broker-dealer. This may not be possible for a number of business reasons and the broker-dealer may not have the proper compliance procedures in place to market and sell hedge fund interests to its customers. For this reason staying with a broker often is not a viable option and unfortunately I have not come across a good solution to this very common problem.

SEC releases statement on protection of customer assets

1 Reply

One of the major questions right now from both hedge fund investors and hedge fund managers is how safe are their assets.  I will be writing an article detailing the answer to this question over the next couple of days.

In the interim, the SEC has released a statement and so has FINRA.  I have posted a brief portion of the FINRA statement which can be found here.  I have also posted the entire SEC statement which can be found here.

FINRA Statement

In virtually all cases, when a brokerage firm ceases to operate, customer assets are safe and typically are transferred in an orderly fashion to another registered brokerage firm. Multiple layers of protection safeguard investor assets. For example, registered brokerage firms must keep their customers’ securities and cash segregated from their own so that, even if a firm fails, its customers’ assets will be safe. Brokerage firms are also required to meet minimum net capital requirements to reduce the likelihood of insolvency, and to be members of the Securities Investor Protection Corp (SIPC), which insures customer securities accounts up to $500,000. SIPC is used in those rare cases of firm failure where customer assets are missing because of theft or fraud. In other words, SIPC is the last course of action in the unlikely event that the other customer protections have failed.

SEC Statement

Statement of SEC Division of Trading and Markets Regarding the Protection of Customer Assets
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2008-216

Washington, D.C., Sept. 20, 2008 — The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Trading and Markets today issued the following statement:

In recent days, Securities and Exchange Commission staff have received a number of questions from investors regarding the protection of their assets held by broker-dealers.

Customers of U.S. registered broker-dealers benefit from the extensive protections provided by the Commission rules, including the Customer Protection Rule, as well as protection by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). The Commission’s Customer Protection Rule requires a broker-dealer to segregate customer cash and securities from a broker-dealer’s own proprietary assets. More specifically, the rule requires that a broker-dealer keep customer cash and fully paid securities free of lien and in a safe location.

Any person who has deposited funds or securities in a securities account at a broker-dealer is a “customer” under the Customer Protection Rule. Securities customers of U.S. broker-dealers are not permitted to opt out of the protections afforded by the Customer Protection Rule. There is a technical exception for affiliates of the broker-dealer, but this exception would not affect the protections generally extended to a customer’s funds and securities deposited at the broker-dealer.

In addition to the Commission’s rules that protect securities customers, SIPC also protects securities customers up to $500,000 per customer, including a maximum of $100,000 for cash claims. To determine if your broker-dealer is a member of SIPC, or to learn more about the SIPC protections, you can check the SIPC website at www.sipc.org.

Form D filing now done online

1 Reply

Earlier this year the SEC approved the formation of an automated filing system for Form D. As noted in this article on Form D, the filing must be made with the SEC 15 days after the first sale of hedge fund interests. While the launch of the new online system was supposed to make it easier for small companies (including hedge funds) to make the filing, in implementation it is a two-step, potentially cumbersome process. In the next few weeks after we make some of these filings, I will be able to rate the new SEC Form D online filing system. The press release below announcing the new system can be found here.

SEC Launches Voluntary Online Filing System for Form D to Reduce Burden on Smaller Companies

Securities and Exchange Commission today began accepting filings of Form D through the Internet as part of the agency’s overall efforts to reduce unnecessary paper filings and regulatory burdens, particularly for smaller companies.

The new rules providing for online filing and simplification of Form D notices were approved by Commission at the end of last year. Form D filings are made mostly by smaller companies, and notify the SEC of sales of securities in private and certain other non-registered offerings of securities. Many states also require Form D notice filings.

“With electronic filing, the information available in Form D filings will now be far more accessible to all users,” said John White, Director of the Division of Corporation Finance. “We look forward to hearing from voluntary filers over the next six months about their experiences as we prepare to move to the mandatory system next spring.”

The SEC’s new Form D online filing system features simplified and updated information requirements and is voluntary until March 16, 2009. Companies and funds required to file Form D notices may continue to file them on paper until that date, following either the old or new information requirements. Guidance on the Form D filing process with the new system as well as more information about filing and amending a Form D notice are available on the SEC Web site.

Form D filers are encouraged to use the voluntary system and inform SEC staff about their experiences. The SEC staff expects adjustments will be made to the system to increase its utility and user-friendliness before the online filing of Form D becomes mandatory. Filers can report their experiences to the SEC’s Office of Small Business Policy in its Division of Corporation Finance at (202) 551-3460 or [email protected].

The SEC staff is continuing to work with the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) to link its Form D filing system with a system built by state securities regulators that would accept state Form D filings. No timetable has been adopted for linking the two systems. (Press Rel. 2008-199)

What is a qualified purchaser?

8 Replies

We have previously discussed the difference between a 3(c)(1) hedge fund and a 3(c)(7) hedge fund. Unlike a 3(c)(1) hedge fund where investors only generally need to be accredited investors and potentially qualified clients, all investors in a 3(c)(7) hedge fund must be “qualified purchasers.” A qualified purchaser is a greater requirement than an accredited investor and a qualified client. Generally only super high net worth individuals and institutional investors will fit within the definition of qualified purchaser. Because of this fact, there are fewer 3(c)(7) hedge funds than 3(c)(1) hedge funds. Also, most 3(c)(7) funds are going to be funds with greater intial investment requirements and will be marketed towards the institutional market. Because of this, 3(c)(7) hedge funds will tend to have greater assets than many 3(c)(1) hedge funds.

The definition of “qualified purchaser” is found in the Investment Company Act of 1940. The definition includes:

i. any natural person (including any person who holds a joint, community property, or other similar shared ownership interest in an issuer that is excepted under section 3(c)(7) with that person’s qualified purchaser spouse) who owns not less than $ 5,000,000 in investments, as defined below;

ii. any company that owns not less than $ 5,000,000 in investments and that is owned directly or indirectly by or for 2 or more natural persons who are related as siblings or spouse (including former spouses), or direct lineal descendants by birth or adoption, spouses of such persons, the estates of such persons, or foundations, charitable organizations, or trusts established by or for the benefit of such persons;

iii. any trust that is not covered by clause (ii) and that was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities offered, as to which the trustee or other person authorized to make decisions with respect to the trust, and each settlor or other person who has contributed assets to the trust, is a person described in clause (i), (ii), or (iv); or

iv. any person, acting for its own account or the accounts of other qualified purchasers, who in the aggregate owns and invests on a discretionary basis, not less than $ 25,000,000 in investments.

v. any qualified institutional buyer as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act, acting for its own account, the account of another qualified institutional buyer, or the account of a qualified purchaser, provided that (i) a dealer described in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of Rule 144A shall own and invest on a discretionary basis at least $25,000,000 in securities of issuers that are not affiliated persons of the dealer; and (ii) a plan referred to in paragraph (a)(1)(D) or (a)(1)(E) of Rule 144A, or a trust fund referred to in paragraph (a)(1)(F) of Rule 144A that holds the assets of such a plan, will not be deemed to be acting for its own account if investment decisions with respect to the plan are made by the beneficiaries of the plan, except with respect to investment decisions made solely by the fiduciary, trustee or sponsor of such plan;

vi. any company that, but for the exceptions provided for in Sections 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) under the ICA, would be an investment company (hereafter in this paragraph referred to as an “excepted investment company”), provided that all beneficial owners of its outstanding securities (other than short-term paper), determined in accordance with Section 3(c)(1)(A) thereunder, that acquired such securities on or before April 30, 1996 (hereafter in this paragraph referred to as “pre-amendment beneficial owners”), and all pre-amendment beneficial owners of the outstanding securities (other than short-term paper) or any excepted investment company that, directly or indirectly, owns any outstanding securities of such excepted investment company, have consented to its treatment as a qualified purchaser.

vii. any natural person who is deemed to be a “knowledgeable employee” of the [fund], as such term is defined in Rule 3c-5(4) of the ICA; or

viii. any person (“Transferee”) who acquires Interests from a person (“Transferor”) that is (or was) a qualified purchaser other than the [fund], provided that the Transferee is: (i) the estate of the Transferor; (ii) a person who acquires the Interests as a gift or bequest pursuant to an agreement relating to a legal separation or divorce; or (iii) a company established by the Transferor exclusively for the benefit of (or owned exclusively by) the Transferor and the persons specified in this paragraph.

ix. any company, if each beneficial owner of the company’s securities is a qualified purchaser.
For the purpsoes of above, the term Investments means:

(1) securities (as defined by section 2(a)(1)of the Securities Act of 1933), other than securities of an issuer that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the prospective qualified purchaser that owns such securities, unless the issuer of such securities is: (i) an investment vehicle; (ii) a public company; or (iii) a company with shareholders’ equity of not less than $50 million (determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles) as reflected on the company’s most recent financial statements, provided that such financial statements present the information as of a date within 16 months preceding the date on which the prospective qualified purchaser acquires the securities of a Section 3(c)(7) Company;

(2) real estate held for investment purposes;

(3) commodity interests held for investment purposes;

(4) physical commodities held for investment purposes;

(5) to the extent not securities, financial contracts (as such term is defined in section 3(c)(2)(B)(ii) of the ICA entered into for investment purposes;

(6) in the case of a prospective qualified purchaser that is a Section 3(c)(7) Company, a company that would be an investment company but for the exclusion provided by section 3(c)(1) of the ICA, or a commodity pool, any amounts payable to such prospective qualified purchaser pursuant to a firm agreement or similar binding commitment pursuant to which a person has agreed to acquire an interest in, or make capital contributions to, the prospective qualified purchaser upon the demand of the prospective qualified purchaser; and

(7) cash and cash equivalents (including foreign currencies) held for investment purposes. For purposes of this section, cash and cash equivalents include: (i) bank deposits, certificates of deposit, bankers acceptances and similar bank instruments held for investment purposes; and (ii) the net cash surrender value of an insurance policy.

What is a qualified client? Qualified client definition

11 Replies

UPDATE: the below article is based on the old “qualified client” definition.  The new “qualified client” definition can be found in full here, and the SEC order increase the asset thresholds can be found here.  As a gross summary, the new definition of a qualified client is:

  • entity or natural person with at least $1,000,000 under management of the advisor, OR
  • entity or natural person who has a net worth of more than $2,100,000

For the second test above, natural persons exclude the value of (and debt with respect to) their primary residence (assuming the primary residence is not under water).

****

Certain hedge fund managers need to be registered as investment advisors with the SEC or with the state securities commission of the state which they reside in.  For SEC-registered investment advisors, and most state registered advisors, the investors in their hedge fund will need to be “qualified clients” in addition to the requirement that such investors are also accredited investors.  While many accredited investors will also be qualified clients, this might not always be the case because the qualified client defintion requires a higher net worth than the accredited investor definition.  Hedge fund managers who are required to have investors who are both accredited investors and qualified clients cannot charge performance fees to those investors who do not meet the qualified client definition.  Individual investors will generally need to have a $1.5 million net worth in order to be considered a “qualified client.”

The definition of “qualified client” comes from rules promulgated by the SEC under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, specifically Rule 205-3.  That rule provides:

The term qualified client means:

1. A natural person who or a company that immediately after entering into the contract has at least $750,000 under the management of the investment adviser;

2. A natural person who or a company that the investment adviser entering into the contract (and any person acting on his behalf) reasonably believes, immediately prior to entering into the contract, either:

a. Has a net worth (together, in the case of a natural person, with assets held jointly with a spouse) of more than $1,500,000 at the time the contract is entered into; or

b. Is a qualified purchaser as defined in section 2(a)(51)(A) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 at the time the contract is entered into; or

3. A natural person who immediately prior to entering into the contract is:

a. An executive officer, director, trustee, general partner, or person serving in a similar capacity, of the investment adviser; or

b. An employee of the investment adviser (other than an employee performing solely clerical, secretarial or administrative functions with regard to the investment adviser) who, in connection with his or her regular functions or duties, participates in the investment activities of such investment adviser, provided that such employee has been performing such functions and duties for or on behalf of the investment adviser, or substantially similar functions or duties for or on behalf of another company for at least 12 months.

What is an accredited investor? Accredited investor definition

17 Replies

[2017 EDITORS NOTE: this article will be updated shortly.  Please note that the definition has changed and that the net worth requirement now carves out any equity or debt of a personal residence.]

Hedge fund managers can only admit certain investors into their hedge funds.  Most hedge funds are structured as private placements relying on the Regulation D 506 offering rules.  Under the Reg D rules, investors must generally be “accredited investors.”  Many hedge funds have additional requirements.

With regard to individual investors, the most common of the below requirements is the $1 million net worth (which does include assets such as a personal residence).   With regard to institutional investors, the most commonly used category is probably #3 below, an entity with at least $5 million in assets.  Please note that there may be additional requirements for your individual hedge fund so you should discuss any questions you have with your attorney.

The accredited investor definition can be found in the Securities Act of 1933.  The definition is:

Accredited investor shall mean any person who comes within any of the following categories, or who the issuer [the hedge fund] reasonably believes comes within any of the following categories, at the time of the sale of the securities [the interests in the hedge fund] to that person:

1. Any bank as defined in section 3(a)(2) of the [Securities] Act, or any savings and loan association or other institution as defined in section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Act whether acting in its individual or fiduciary capacity; any broker or dealer registered pursuant to section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; any insurance company as defined in section 2(a)(13) of the Act; any investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 or a business development company as defined in section 2(a)(48) of that Act; any Small Business Investment Company licensed by the U.S. Small Business Administration under section 301(c) or (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958; any plan established and maintained by a state, its political subdivisions, or any agency or instrumentality of a state or its political subdivisions, for the benefit of its employees, if such plan has total assets in excess of $5,000,000; any employee benefit plan within the meaning of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 if the investment decision is made by a plan fiduciary, as defined in section 3(21) of such act, which is either a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, or registered investment adviser, or if the employee benefit plan has total assets in excess of $5,000,000 or, if a self-directed plan, with investment decisions made solely by persons that are accredited investors;

2. Any private business development company as defined in section 202(a)(22) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940;

3. Any organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, corporation, Massachusetts or similar business trust, or partnership, not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities offered, with total assets in excess of $5,000,000;

4. Any director, executive officer, or general partner of the issuer of the securities being offered or sold, or any director, executive officer, or general partner of a general partner of that issuer;

5. Any natural person whose individual net worth, or joint net worth with that person’s spouse, at the time of his purchase exceeds $1,000,000;

6. Any natural person who had an individual income in excess of $200,000 in each of the two most recent years or joint income with that person’s spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of those years and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year;

7. Any trust, with total assets in excess of $5,000,000, not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring the securities offered, whose purchase is directed by a sophisticated person as described in Rule 506(b)(2)(ii) and

8. Any entity in which all of the equity owners are accredited investors.

Requirements for Hedge Fund Performance Reporting

6 Replies

Performance results are the ribbons of the hedge fund industry. In order to raise institutional money for your hedge fund, you will need good performance results. Even hedge fund managers who will not be focusing on raising money from institutional investors will need to have performance results in order to market the hedge fund. Performance results are usually displayed in a hedge fund pitchbook format, a tearsheet format and/or with monthly or quarterly performance reports to investors. Whenever performance results are included, the manager must make sure that the proper performance disclosures accompany the results. As a routine matter, all hedge fund performance results and advertisements should be reviewed by a hedge fund attorney.

SEC Guidance – Clover Capital No-Action Letter

The SEC has authority under the anti-fraud provisions of the investment adviser’s act (which apply to both registered and unregistered hedge fund managers) to police the performance results of hedge fund managers. [HFLB note: please see “Basis of SEC authority” below for explanation.] Under this authority, the SEC has provided some guidance on this subject through the Clover Capital no-action letter. Clover Capital is not famous because of the position of the staff with regard to a certain party, but because the staff went further and provided guidelines for all managers in how performance results should be disclaimed.

The Clover Capital letter is notable for a few reasons including that (i) it provides guidance on both model results (sometimes referred to as “backtested”) and actual results and (ii) it requires that performance results be present “net of fees.” While some aspects of the Clover Capital requirements have been softened in certain specific fact circumstances, through subsequent no-action letters, Clover Capital remains the central source of guidance for performance reporting requirements. These requirements (with footnotes omitted) are broken down below.

Model and Actual Results

With regard to model and actual results, the staff believes that a hedge fund manager is prohibited from publishing an advertisement that:

  1. Fails to disclose the effect of material market or economic conditions on the results portrayed (e.g., an advertisement stating that the accounts of the adviser’s clients appreciated in the value 25% without disclosing that the market generally appreciated 40% during the same period);
  2. Includes model or actual results that do not reflect the deduction of advisory fees, brokerage or other commissions, and any other expenses that a client would have paid or actually paid;
  3. Fails to disclose whether and to what extent the results portrayed reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings;
  4. Suggests or makes claims about the potential for profit without also disclosing the possibility of loss;
  5. Compares model or actual results to an index without disclosing all material facts relevant to the comparison (e.g. an advertisement that compares model results to an index without disclosing that the volatility of the index is materially different from that of the model portfolio);
  6. Fails to disclose any material conditions, objectives, or investment strategies used to obtain the results portrayed (e.g., the model portfolio contains equity stocks that are managed with a view towards capital appreciation);
  7. Fails to disclose prominently the limitations inherent in model results, particularly the fact that such results do not represent actual trading and that they may not reflect the impact that material economic and market factors might have had on the adviser’s decision-making if the adviser were actually managing clients’ money;
  8. Fails to disclose, if applicable, that the conditions, objectives, or investment strategies of the model portfolio changed materially during the time period portrayed in the advertisement and, if so, the effect of any such change on the results portrayed;
  9. Fails to disclose, if applicable, that any of the securities contained in, or the investment strategies followed with respect to, the model portfolio do not relate, or only partially relate, to the type of advisory services currently offered by the adviser (e.g., the model includes some types of securities that the adviser no longer recommends for its clients);
  10. Fails to disclose, if applicable, that the adviser’s clients had investment results materially different from the results portrayed in the model;

Actual Results

Additionally, with regard to actual results, the staff believes that a hedge fund manager is prohibited from publishing an advertisement that fails to disclose prominently, if applicable, that the results portrayed relate only to a select group of the adviser’s clients, the basis on which the selection was made, and the effect of this practice on the results portrayed, if material.

Closing

The SEC staff closed the Clover Capital letter with the following statement that should be given great weight by all hedge fund managers:

We wish to emphasize that: (1) it is the responsibility of every adviser using model or actual results to ensure that the advertisement is not false or misleading; (2) the list set forth above of advertising practices the staff believes are prohibited by Rule 206(4)-1(a)(5) is not intended to be all-inclusive or to provide a safe harbor; and (3) the staff, as a matter of policy, will not review specific advertisements.

Clover Capital – Basis for SEC authority

The following comes from the Clover Capital no-action letter and states the SEC staff’s basis for their authority to produce guidance on performance advertising requirements.

Section 206 of the Act prohibits certain transactions by any investment adviser, whether registered or exempt from registration pursuant to Section 203(b) of the Act. Under paragraph (4) of Section 206, the Commission has authority to adopt rules defining acts, practices, and courses of business that are fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative. Pursuant to this authority, the Commission adopted Rule 206(4)-1, which defines the use of certain specific types of advertisements by advisers as fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative.* Although the rule does not specifically prohibit an adviser from using model or actual results, or prescribe the manner of advertising these results, paragraph (5) of the rule makes it a fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative act for any investment adviser to distribute, directly or indirectly, any advertisement that contains any untrue statement of a material fact or that is otherwise false or misleading.** Accordingly, the applicable legal standard governing the advertising of model or actual results is that contained in paragraph (5) of the rule, i.e., whether the particular advertisement is false or misleading.***

* For example, Rule 206(4)-1 prohibits an adviser from using advertisements that include testimonials (paragraph (a)) or that refer to past specific recommendations unless certain information is provided (paragraph (b)). The staff is currently reviewing Rule 206(4)-1 to determine whether it needs to be revised or updated. See Investment Advisers Act Rel. No. 1033 (Aug. 6, 1986).

** As a general matter, whether any advertisement is false or misleading will depend on the particular facts and circumstances surrounding its use, including (1) the form as well as the content of the advertisement, (2) the implications or inferences arising out of the advertisement in its total context, and (3) the sophistication of the prospective client. See, e.g., Covato/ Lipsitz, Inc. (pub. avail. Oct. 23, 1981)(“Covato”); Edward F. O’Keefe (pub. avail. Apr. 13, 1978)(“O’Keefe”); Anametrics Investment Management (pub. avail. May 5, 1977)(“Anametrics”).

*** Of course, if an advertisement containing model or actual results also includes any of the specific advertising practices addressed by paragraphs (a)(1)-(a)(4) of the Rule 206(4)-1, the advertisement would have to comply with the requirements of these paragraphs.

If you have any questions on this article or would like to discuss your hedge fund performance results, please contact us.

Hedge Fund Websites – How to Run a Hedge Fund Website

6 Replies

A common question from start-up hedge fund managers is what kind of a website can I have and how do I go about getting investors through an internet solicitation? The unfortunate answer is that hedge fund managers must be very careful when they are designing their website. In general, websites for a hedge fund or a hedge fund manager need to be very low key and potentially password protected. This is especially important in the current regulatory enviornment because securities officials, at both the federal and state level, are becoming more and more vigilant about enforcing the website solicitation rules. This article will briefly detail the legal background and some website best practices.

Regulation D – no “public offering”

Most hedge funds are offered to investors through a Regulation D private placement offering. One of the requirements of the Reg. D offering is that the sale of securities (interests in the hedge fund) is not done through a “public offering.” While there is no exact definition of “public offering,” it will generally mean that the hedge fund is not allowed to offer or sell interests through general solicitation or general advertising. According to the SEC, the analysis can be broken down into two main questions: (i) is a communication a general solicitation or advertisement, and, if so, (ii) is it being used to offer or sell securities? If the answer to either of these questions is negative, the fund is not in violation of public offering rules.

Regulation D – the “pre-existing” relationship

If a private placement is offered to potential investors with whom the hedge fund manager has no pre-existing relationship, the SEC may conclude that there was a general solicitation in violation of the Reg D rules.

Frequently, an issuer can satisfy the pre-existing relationship requirement through prior investment or other business dealings with the potential purchaser. The pre-existing relationship generally involves at least some degree of contact between the issuer and the prospective purchaser prior to the offering – generally 30 days from a “first contact.”

[HFLB note: there are a couple of very important no-action letters on this subject. I will be posting these in the next couple of days.]

Website Best Practices

We will generally recommend that all web presence be minimized. The two most important principles with regard to web presence and web communications are (1) do not name the hedge fund and (2) do not personally, or by fiat, write that you manage a hedge fund. Besides those two overriding items, we recommend that the web presence is minimal at all times. However, we are aware that from a business standpoint, the manager would like to have a web presence.

There are five important parts to a hedge fund website:

The Splash Page

The hedge fund manager should have an initial “splash page” which might include the name of the management company (do not say you are an “investment advisor” unless registered as such in your state of residence or with the SEC). The splash page should include very minimal information.

Note: you should not include your phone number or contact information on this splash page.

Registration Page

This page should have questions to determine if a viewer is qualified to be viewing the fund’s information over the internet. Generally this will include the accredited investor qualifications; it may also mean that the qualified client qualifications are also included.

Login Page (may be on the splash page)

This page will be for viewers who are either currently invested in your fund or who have met the qualifications of registration.

Password protected content

All identifying information of the fund and management company should be password protected. You should never post the fund’s offering documents on the internet unless there are stringent controls in place to make sure that the offering documents can only be viewed by the one investor they are intended for – even if there are these stringent controls, we would normally recommend against this practice.

General disclaimer

The site should have a general disclaimer which should be prepared by an attorney. Additionally, all performance information within the password protected portion of your website should have all appropriate disclaimers.

Note: it is recommended that once you have an almost final draft of the website, you should have your lawyer review before it goes live.

Legal Developments and Conclusion

The regulators are very sensitve about website solicitations. For example,the State of Massachusetts is trying to fine activist hedge fund manager Phillip Goldstein, of Bulldog Investors, because of how he designed his fund’s website. The famed investment adviser is under prosecution by Massachusetts for allowing potential investors unrestricted access to Bulldog’s website. [HFLB to insert the complaint.]

Because of this and other activity it is extremely important that you have your hedge fund attorney discuss the website rules with you. Please contact us if you have further questions or if you would like help launching your hedge fund website.

Blue sky laws and filings for hedge funds

9 Replies

The term “blue sky laws” refers, generically, to any of the securities laws of the individual states.  Each state has a set of laws on its books dealing with securities.  These laws have many similarities to the securities laws at the federal level (the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940); in fact, many of the state blue sky laws are based on the laws at the federal level.  The state blue sky laws are enforced by the state securities administrator which is the state’s enforcement agency – it serves a similar function as the SEC does at the federal level.  Additionally, the state securities administrator may work in conjunction with the SEC in certain matters.

There are two distinct instances when, in virtually all of the states, blue sky laws become applicable to hedge fund managers (even unregistered hedge fund managers).

Blue Sky Anti-Fraud Authority

The first instance is when the state administrator pursues an action (i.e. request information, etc.) against a hedge fund manager (even if the hedge fund manager is unregistered) pursuant to its anti-fraud authority.  While each state’s anti-fraud statutes will differ, they are all drafted very broadly to give the state administrator wide lattitude for going after potential hedge fund frauds.  However, under this authority, the state administrator can also go after honest hedge fund managers.  While uncommon, it may happen in certain instances.  If it does, you should contact an experienced attorney immediately.  For most all unregistered hedge fund managers, this should not be something to worry about.

Blue Sky Filing Requirements

The second and more common instance when blue sky laws are implicated is when a fund will need to make a “blue sky filing.” As a general statement, a hedge fund will need to make a “blue sky filing” in each state where one of its investors resides.  The filing will generally need to be made within 15 days of the date of the investment into the hedge fund and the investment manager will need to pay a fee which will usually range anywhere from $75-$300 or more.  (Please note: for investors from New York a manager will need to make the blue sky filing prior to an initial investment into the fund.  The New York filing fee is going to be approzimately $1,400.)

To make a blue sky filing, you will first need to provide your hedge fund attorney or your compliance consultant with a few items of information including:

1. state where the investor resides
2. amount of the investment (including the amount of all previous investments)
3. the minimum investment amount (can be found in the hedge fund offering documents)
4. the management fee (can be found in the hedge fund offering documents)

After recieving this information your lawyer will complete a Form D and a Form U-2 and will help coordinate the filing of these documents with the appropriate state administrator.  The lawyer will also send a copy of Form D to the SEC for filing.  Form D filings are searchable through the SEC Edgar search engine.

Blue Sky Questions

Question: Does the fund or the management company pay the blue sky filing fees?

Answer: Most all offering documents which I have seen specifically name blue sky filing fees as an expense of the fund.  However, if this is not specifically named as a fund expense in your fund’s offering documents, it will likely still be a fund expense as most fund’s have a general catch-all for expenses like these.  If you have any specific questions, it is best to get clarity from your attorney.

Question: Does a manager have to pay the blue sky filing fee to each state on a yearly basis?

Answer: This is a good question.  As with many blue sky questions, it will depend on the specific state.  Some states only require a one-time filing fee, other states require that the filing fee be paid on an annual basis.  New York is a combination of these two as its filing fee is good for four years.  Your attorney or compliance professional should be able to discuss this with you on a state by state basis.

Offshore hedge fund director requirements

2 Replies

Two of the most popular offshore hedge fund jurisdictions are the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands. In another post I will detail the requirements for registration or recognition with these jurisdictions, but for the purposes of this article it is enough to point out that both jurisdictions will generaly require each hedge fund entity (in the case of a master feeder structure there would normally be two offshore entities) to have two directors.

Cayman Islands Director Requirements

In the Cayman there are two types of funds – (i) Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (“CIMA”) registered funds and CIMA non-registered funds. CIMA registration is required if a hedge fund is open-ended (allows investors the option to redeem) and has 16 or more investors. CIMA registration is not required if a hedge fund is closed-edned (does not allow investor the option to redeem) or if a hedge fund has 15 or fewer investors who have the right to appoint or remove directors.

For CIMA registered funds, there must be at least 2 directors who must be individuals. For non-CIMA registered funds, there must be at least 1 director who must be an individual. The individual directors do need not to be a Cayman resident.

BVI “four eyes” policy

In the BVI most hedge funds are deemed to be mutual funds. Because they are mutual funds, they will need to be “recognized” as such with the BVI’s Financial Services Comission (“FSC”).

Pursuant to BVI laws and statutes all companies (including hedge funds) are only required to have 1 director. However the FSC has just recently instituted a new “four eyes” policy which effectively requires that all funds have two directors (the “four eyes” policy has been applied for some time in relation to BVI-incorporated investment managers; however, its application to BVI based funds is a new development). This policy is not codified and it seems to be enforced only on a case by case basis. We are recommending to our clients that they name 2 directors because the liklihood of the FSC requiring 2 directors prior to recognition is quite high.

In the BVI a hedge fund can name a company to be a director.

Offshore Nominee Directors

Not all hedge funds will not have two persons who wish to serve as directors of the fund. The reasons may vary from unwanted perceptions to unwanted responsibilities. For whatever reason in these instances the hedge fund will need to name another person (or a company, for the BVI) which will serve as a director for the fund.

In such cases an offshore hedge fund manager may want to think about using a “nominee” director. There are companies in both the BVI and the Cayman Islands which can provide nominee director services, usually on an annual basis, for a fee. While these fees will depend on a number of factors, including the percieved risk of the fund and the manager, you will probably be looking at anywhere from US $5,000-$10,000 per year.

When searching for a nominee director we recommend shopping around as there are going to be groups which naturally feel more and less comfortable with your program. Some nominees will require some sort of involvement in the high-level affairs of the fund. Some nominees will also ask to be at least be co-signatories on any bank accounts opened in the name of the fund. These precautions are understandable as the nominee services are typically provided by services companies (registered office, registered agent, etc) who could potentially lose their license if something happens with the fund.

Directors from non-US jurisdictions

Please note with all directors the issue of perception. There have been recent instances of large brokerage firms refusing to establish brokerage accounts for some hedge funds because the directors (or even a director) were from states known to support terrorism. It will be a good idea to think about selecting a director who is from country which supports or sponsors terrorism. I do not think that this is a wide-spread practice; however, if a brokerage firm does not allow for the account formation because a new director will need to be appointed, you are going to end up delaying your launch.

Confidentiallity of Director information

In the BVI, the details of directors and shareholders of BVI funds is strictly confidential and not a matter of public record. Funds can if they wish elect to file a register or a document which details directors &/or shareholders but this is not common practice. Obviously the details of directors and shareholders may come into the public domian when they are distributed to third parties (e.g. administrators or auditors) but many times these third parties have previously agreed to keep also such information strictly confidential. Any information held by a fund’s registered agent, likewise, will be kept confidential unless required to be disclosed by order of the FSC (believing it to be in the best interests of the jurisdiction – this is not common and generally requires substantial proof of criminal activity), or a BVI Court.

Offshore Director due diligence requirements

Becoming a director of a company which acts as a hedge fund is not difficult but there are many due diligence requirements for all directors of these companies. While all jurisdictions will differ, the BVI and the Caymans will typically require the following documents from each director:

  • List of director details – name, address, etc
  • Copy of director utility bill – can include: gas, power, electric, water, television/cable, phone/internet; showing home address; notarized
  • Copy of director passport – showing a clear picture of the director, notarized
  • Director bank reference – should include length of relationship; may need to include average amount of assets
  • Director professional reference – should be from a lawyer or accountant who has had a previous professional relationship with the director
  • List of owners/shareholders of director (if an entity)
  • Copy of director formation documents (if an entity)
  • Other items as requested by the registered agent

Please contact us if you have any questions on any of the above or would like to inquire about a nominee director or establishing an offshore hedge fund.