Proposed Investment Adviser Regulations Overview

Leave a reply

As we discussed in an earlier post, the SEC proposed new rules and amendments to existing rules under the Investment Advisers Act (the “Act”) to implement certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act related to hedge fund registration.

In summary, the new rules:

  • clarify eligibility for SEC registration for hedge fund and other asset managers
  • establish reporting requirements for certain “exempt reporting advisers”
  • require greater disclosure by registered IAs and each managed private fund in Form ADV
  • clarify the scope of new exemptions from SEC registration
  • propose amendments to the “pay to play” rules of the Act

This post will provide an overview of these proposals in greater depth.  Please feel free to comment below or contact us with your thoughts on the new rules as we are currently in the process of drafting a comment letter to the SEC about the proposed rules.

****

Rule 203A-1 Switching to or from SEC Registration

The new Rule 203A-1 provides state and SEC registered IAs with information on the time requirements for switching registration status.

State-registered switching to SEC-registered: After filing an annual amendment indicating eligibility for SEC registration (and not relying on an exemption from registration under sections 203(l) or 203(m) of the Act discussed below), apply for registration with the SEC within 90 days.

SEC-registered switching to State-registered: After filing an annual amendment indicating you are no longer eligible for SEC registration (and not relying on an exemption from registration under sections 203(l) or 203(m) of the Act discussed below), you must file Form ADV-W to withdraw SEC registration within 180 days of your fiscal year end (unless you are then eligible for SEC registration).  Note: during dual registration, the Act and applicable state laws apply.

For full text and overview please see our post on Rule 203A-1.

Rule 203A-5 IA Registration Transition Rules

IAs registered with the SEC on July 21, 2011 must report their AUM (via amendment to Form ADV) to the SEC by August 20, 2011, or 30 days after the effective date of the amendments, and to report the market value of its AUM determined within 30 days of the filing.  If such IAs are at that time below the threshold for SEC registration, the IA must withdraw from SEC registration by October 19, 2011 (and generally be registered with the state in which the adviser’s maintains its principle office and place of business).

In addition, the SEC is also proposing amendments to Form ADV which will require registered IAs to provide additional information regarding: (i) the private funds they advise, including AUM, the nature of the investors in the fund and the fund’s service providers; (ii) their advisory business, including information about the types of clients they have and potentially significant conflicts of interest; and (iii) additional information about non-advisory activities and financial industry affiliations.

For full text and overview please see our post on Rule 203A-5.

Rule 204-4 Reporting by Exempt Reporting Advisers:

Certain “exempt reporting advisers” exempt from SEC registration pursuant to Sections 203(l) and 203(m) of the Act (discussed below) must file Form ADV (but not Form ADV Part 2) with the SEC, following instructions specifically pertaining to such advisers.  Such advisers must file their initial Form ADV no later than August 20, 2011.

For full text and overview please see our post on Rule 204-4.

Rule 202(a)(30)-1 Foreign Private Adviser Exemption

This new exemption from SEC registration applies to “foreign private advisers.”

A “foreign private adviser” is an investment adviser that:

  • has no place of business in the U.S;
  • has less than $25 million in aggregate assets under management from U.S. clients and private fund investors;
  • has fewer than 15 U.S. clients and private fund investors; and
  • neither holds itself out to U.S. investors as an investment adviser nor acts as an investment adviser to any investment company registered under the Investment Company Act or any company that has elected to be a business development company.

“Foreign private advisers” do not need to comply with the reporting requirements under the new Section 204-4.

For full text and overview please see our post on Rule 202(a)(30)-1.

Rule 203(l)-1 Venture Capital Fund Exemption

This new exemption from SEC registration applies to advisers that solely advise “venture capital funds.”

A “venture capital fund” is a private fund that:

  • represents it is a venture capital fund;
  • invests in only equity securities of a portfolio company and 80% of such securities must have been acquired directly from the portfolio company;
  • has a management company which provides guidance to the portfolio company regarding management and operations of the portfolio company or the fund must control the portfolio company;
  • uses less than 15% leverage which may only be short term; and
  • provides fund investors with no withdrawal rights except in extraordinary circumstances.

The proposed rule also provides a grandfathering provision for certain presently existing venture capital funds.

For full text and overview please see our post on Rule 203(l)-1.

Rule 203(m)-1 Private Fund Adviser Exemption

This new exemption from SEC registration applies to advisers that solely advise private funds and have AUM in the U.S. of less than $150MM.  [HFLB note: the adviser may still be required to register pursuant to state law.]  The adviser must aggregate the value of all assets of the private funds it manages to determine whether it falls below the $150MM threshold.  AUM must be determined quarterly, with valuation based on the fair value of assets at the end of the quarter.  If an adviser’s AUM exceeds $150MM in private fund assets, the adviser must register as an investment adviser with the SEC within one calendar quarter.

For full text and overview please see our post on Rule 203(m)-1.

Rule 206(4)-5 Pay to Play Rules

Under the proposed amendment, an adviser would be permitted to pay a registered municipal advisor, instead of a “regulated person,” to solicit government entities on its behalf if the municipal advisor is subject to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board’s (the “MSRB”) pay-to-play rules.

****

As with any proposed rulemaking process, there are a number of ambiguities with respect to the proposals and a number of questions regarding the application of certain rules to the certain situations.  These issues are expected to be identified during the comment process and hopefully the SEC will be able to modify the proposed rules as appropriate when the final rules are promulgated.  One central open issue is the change from SEC to state registration for managers with less than $100MM AUM – it seems pretty clear that most states will not be able to handle an increase in the amount of managers that will be subject to state regulation.

As discussed in the proposals, public comments are due on January 24, 2011.

A full copy of the proposed rules are available here.

Comments received by the SEC on the proposed rules are available for review here.

****

Other related hedge fund articles:

Bart Mallon, Esq. runs the hedge fund law blog and provides registration and hedge fund compliance services to managers through Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Qualified Eligible Person (QEP) Definition

3 Replies

The securities laws can be written obtusely and the definition of a qualified eligible person (QEP) may be one of the best examples of this.  There is no quick and easy definition of a what a QEP is so we are trying to make it as easy as possible to understand.  This post discusses the importance of the classification, provides the overview of the definition and then provides a link to the actual statutory language.

Why QEP Definition is Important for CPOs

The definition of QEP is important for commodity pool operators (CPOs) in a couple of situations.  The first is the 4.13(a)(4) exemption from the registration provisions for a CPO that provides advice to a commodity pool with only QEPs.  The second situation where a CPO will need to make sure the investors are QEPs is if they want to take advantage of the Rule 4.7 exemption.  The Rule 4.7 exemption allows CPOs to follow less-strict reporting requirements with regard to the commodity pool they manage.  These two exemptions essentially provide for reduced regulatory oversight of a CPO who provides advisory services to these class of investors.

Definition of QEP

A qualified eligible person is an investor who fits into one of two distinct groups: (1) investors who do not need to meet the portfolio requirement and (2) investors who need to meet the portfolio requirement.

1.  Investors who do not need to meet the portfolio requirement:

The following are considered to be QEPs regardless of whether or not they meet the portfolio requirement:

  • registered futures commission merchants
  • registered broker or dealers
  • registered commodity pool operators (under certain conditions, see rule for more details)
  • registered commodity trading advisors (under certain conditions, see rule for more details)
  • state or SEC registered investment advisers (under certain conditions, see rule for more details)
  • qualified purchasers
  • knowledgeable employee of the CPOs
  • certain persons related to advisers to exempt from registration as a CPO or CTA
  • trusts (under certain conditions, see rule for more details)
  • 501(c)(3) organizations (under certain conditions, see rule for more details)
  • non-United States persons
  • certain entities in which all of the owners/participants are QEPs

2.  Investors who need to meet the portfolio requirement:

The following will be considered to be QEPs only if they meet the portfolio requirement described below:

  • investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act (i.e. mutual funds)
  • certain business development companies (defined under both the Investment Company Act and Investment Advisers Act)
  • banks, savings and loan associations, and other like institutions acting for their own accounts or for the account of a QEP
  • insurance companies acting for their own account or for the account of a qualified eligible person
  • plans established and maintained by various governments and related bodies for the benefit of their employees, if such plan has total assets in excess of $5,000,000
  • employee benefit plans within the meaning of the ERISA (under certain conditions, see rule for more details)
  • 501(c)(3) organizations with total assets in excess of $5,000,000
  • corporations, business trusts, partnerships, LLCs or similar business ventures with total assets in excess of $5,000,000 and not formed for the specific purpose of participating in the exempt investment program
  • a natural person whose individual net worth, or joint net worth with that person’s spouse, at the time of either his purchase in the exempt pool or his opening of an exempt account exceeds $1,000,000 [HFLB note: this is one part of the accredited investor definition]
  • a natural person who had an individual income in excess of $200,000 in each of the two most recent years or joint income with that person’s spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of those years and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year [HFLB note: this is one part of the accredited investor definition]
  • pools, trusts, insurance company separate accounts or bank collective trusts, with total assets in excess of $5,000,000 (under certain conditions, see below)
  • other entities authorized by law to engage in such transactions (under certain conditions, see rule for more details)

3.  Portfolio Requirement

If an investor is one of the entities described in (2) above, it will also need to meet the portfolio requirement.  The portfolio requirement can be met in one of three ways:

  • Owns securities and other investments with an aggregate market value of at least $2MM;
  • Has had on deposit with a FCM at least $200K in exchange-specified initial margin and option premiums for commodity interest transactions in the 6 months prior to the investment; or
  • Has a combination of the two above.  For example, has $1MM in securities/investments and $100K in exchange-specified initial margin in the 6 months prior to the investment

The above definitions have been shortened for the purpose of providing a general overview.  When determining whether an investor meets the qualified eligible person definition the CPO should take special care to make sure that the investor meets the full definition which can be found here.  Generally the investor will make these representations in the subscription documents which are drafted by the hedge fund attorney.

****

Other related Hedge Fund Law Blog articles include:

Bart Mallon, Esq. runs the Hedge Fund Law Blog.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Fund Appreciation Rights

2 Replies

Alternative Hedge Fund Compensation Structure

At the very beginning of this year there was much discussion about the hedge fund compensation structure in light of the horrible returns from 2008.  Many funds lost money but managers aren’t typically subject to the same types of clawback provisions as private equity fund managers.  Additionally some funds had to close shop because of talent retention issues or because the manager realized that reaching a previous high water mark would take too long.  Generally investors who have lost money will prefer to stay in a fund (all else being equal) because of the high water mark – when investors go into a new fund, there high water mark is their initial investment which means they are going to be subject to hedge fund performance fees sooner than in a fund which has previously lost money.

FAR Alternative

As an alternative to the traditional performance fee/ allocation structure, some hedge funds are instituting a different compensation structure called fund appreciation rights (FARs).  Generally this structure provides a more aligned incentive structure for the manager.  Essentially the FARs provide an option like mechanism for the manager.  This option also has the potential to allow the manager to defer recognition of income which may be an added tax benefit for the manager.  [Note: a longer discussion on this issue will be forthcoming shortly.]

Issues with FARs

FARs are new.  It is not known how many groups have implemented FARs or whether they will catch on (or become the next standard).  It is likely that any movement in this area will be driven by the demand (if any) by institutional investors for such products.  FARs are also untested and it is not clear how they will be viewed by the IRS.  As we have recently seen, there has been a big push to disallow the tax advantages of the performance allocation to hedge fund managers and in the current political climate it is likely that the IRS will scrutinize such transactions.

We will continue to research and report on this and other tax structures for hedge fund managers.

****

Other related hedge fund law articles:

Bart Mallon, Esq. of Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP runs the Hedge Fund Law Blog.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Weekly Hedge Fund News Stories | November 30 – December 4

1 Reply

Below are a list of some of the news stories which caught my attention this week.

****

Hedge Fund Carried Interest Tax “Loophole” Repeal? – the hedge fund carried interest “loophole” is again being discussed as a potential issue to be addressed by Congress before the end of the year.  One proposal introduced by Representative Levin (R) has reportedly passed the House twice but is meeting opposition in the Senate.  Watch for a bill to be included as a last minute rider.  For more background, see articles by Boston.com and Reuters.

Wall Street “Transaction Tax” Introduced in House – A group of Congressmen introduced legislation to tax Wall Street.  According to a press release by Representative Peter DeFazio (D-OR), investment transactions (including stocks, futures, swaps, CDSs, and options) will be subject to “small” transaction taxes which could raise up to $150 billion a year.   The tax would not apply to certain groups like IRAs, mutual funds, and HSAs.  See also a SIFMA press release which discusses this issue.

Florida to Invest $500MM in Hedge Funds – managers who are looking for an allocation from a large pension plan should look toward Florida which is looking to get into hedge funds.  According an article on Pension & Investments, Florida has hired Cambridge Associates as a consultant to help with the search.

Positive November for Hedge Funds – Hedge fund managers gained an average of 1.8% in November according to this Market Watch article.

****

Other articles I liked this week:

Other:

There is a lot of chatter out there about hedge funds and insider trading.  Evidently the SEC is continuing to pursue large hedge fund groups who may have been involved.

****
Bart Mallon, Esq. of Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP runs the Hedge Fund Law Blog.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Hedge Funds, the Secondary Market and PTP Issues

1 Reply

Secondary Hedge Fund Market Poses Issues for Fund Managers

Recently there have been a number of groups springing up to provide a secondary hedge fund market.  While such platforms provide investors with a potential avenue to get out of their illiquid investment (the investment in the fund may be illiquid for a number of reasons including the imposition of a gate provision), they pose problems for the hedge fund manager who will have to deal with the mechanical issues involved in a transfer of the fund interests.  Additionally, as noted in the article below, the manager may have to worry about the PTP issues involved with such potential transfer.

The following article was written by Doug Cornelius of the Compliance Building blog and is reprinted with permission.  All links in the article are from the original.

****

Classification of Private Funds as Publicly Traded Partnerships

Due to the increasing incidence of fund investors who want to transfer their investment fund interests, private investment funds face a risk of being classified as publicly traded partnerships. That would mean the fund would become taxable as a corporation.

A bad result.

Under Internal Revenue Code § 7704, a partnership will be classified as a publicly traded partnership if (1) the fund interests are traded on an established securities market or (2) the fund interests are readily tradable on a secondary market or its substantial equivalent.

The big problem is determining when you have a “substantial equivalent” of a secondary market. Under the regulations, the IRS uses a facts and circumstances test to determine if “partners are readily able to buy, sell, or exchange their partnership interests in a manner that is comparable, economically, to trading on an established securities market.” You hate to get into a facts and circumstances discussion with the IRS.

Fortunately there are some safeguards in the implementing regulations at 26 C.F.R. § 1.7704-1.

Involvement of the Partnership

For purposes of section 7704(b), interests in a partnership are not readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent unless (1) The partnership participates in the establishment of the market or (2) The partnership recognizes any transfers made on the market by (i) redeeming the transferor partner or (ii) admitting the transferee as a partner.

Since most fund partnerships require the general partner to approve the the transferee and then admit the transferee, they are unlikely to be able to take advantage of this safe harbor.

De Minimis Trading Safeharbor

The focus of a fund should be on the 2% de minimis safe harbor. 26 C.F.R. § 1.7704-1(j) provides for interests in a partnership to be deemed not readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof if the sum of the percentage interests in partnership capital or profits transferred during the taxable year of the partnership does not exceed 2 percent of the total interests in partnership capital or profits.

You want avoid having more than 2 percent of the partnership interests changing hands each tax year.

If you get close to that number there are several transfers that are disregarded transfers for this safeharbor, including:

  • block transfers by a single partner of more than 2% of the total interests
  • intrafamily transfers
  • transfers at death
  • distributions from a qualified retirement plan
  • Transfers by one or more partners of interests representing  50 percent or more of the total interests in partnership

Private Placement Safeharbor

The regulations deem a transfer to not be a trade if it was a private placement. But the regulations have their own definition of a private placement: (1) the issuance of the partnership interests had to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933,  and (2) the partnership does not have more than 100 partners at any time during the tax year of the partnership. 26 C.F.R. § 1.7704-1(h)

The first prong should be straight-forward for most private funds. The trickier part is the second prong. In some circumstances the IRS can look through the holder of a partnership interest to its beneficial owners and expand the number of partners to include the beneficial holders of that interest.

Passive Income Safeharbor

If a fund is determined to be a Publicly Traded Partnership, it will nonetheless not be taxed as a corporation if 90% or more of the fund’s gross income is passive-type income. [26 U.S.C. § 7704(c)] Passive-type income generally includes dividends, real property rents, gains from the sale of real property, income from mining and oil and gas properties, gains from the sale of capital assets held to produce income, and gains from commodities (not held primarily for sale in the ordinary course of business), futures, forwards, or options with respect to commodities. The income test is on a taxable year basis and must be have been met each prior year.

References:

****

Please also see the post on hedge fund compliance and twitter which includes another reprint of a Compliance Building article.

Other related hedge fund law articles include:

Bart Mallon, Esq. of Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP runs the Hedge Fund Law Blog.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Hedge Fund Events December 2009

Leave a reply

The following are various hedge fund events happening this month.  Please email us if you would like us to add your event to this list.

****

December 1

December 1 – December 2

December 1 – December 2

December 1 – December 2

December 1 – December 2

December 1 – December 3

December 1 – December 3

December 1 – December 3

December 2

December 2

December 2

December 2 – December 3

  • Sponsor: European Private Equity & Venture Capital Association
  • Event: EVCA Buyout Forum
  • Location: Paris

December 2 – December 3

December 3

December 3

December 3

December 3

December 3

December 3

December 6 – December 8

December 7 – December 9

December 8

December 8

December 9

December 9 – December 11

December 10

December 10

December 10

December 14 – December 15

December 16

Series 65 and Series 66 Passing Grade Increased

36 Replies

IA Exams Pass Rates Expected to Plummet

The North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”) recently announced that the two central investment advisor exams (the Series 65 and the Series 66) will become even more difficult.  Starting January 1, 2010 candidates will need to attain a score of 72% in order to pass the Series 65 exam and a 75% in order to pass the Series 66 exam.  NASAA did not make any statements on its website or at its Annual Conference earlier this year about the change or the reason for the change.

I had a chance to talk with Chuck Lowenstein of Kaplan Financial Education about the announcement.  “The exams have been oddities,” said Lowenstein, “everything else in the business requires a 70% to pass and the 65 had been kind of weird at 68.5% and the 66 as well at 71%. With these new numbers, NASAA has entered new territory. I suspect pass rates will plummet, unless they feel that the new exams will be so much easier (never happened in the past) that they need to bump up the minimum.”

Chuck went on to discuss the likely future performance for people taking the exams.  “Based on our students’ performance, this will have a devastating effect on the overall pass rate. A significant percentage of exam takers pass with little room to spare and bumping the requirements by 4 or 5 questions on these exams (the 68.5% on the 65 was 89 correct – 72% is 93.6 questions so they’ll either round up to 94 or down to 93, that has not yet been disclosed) is going to catch many exam takers.”

We do not recommend that exam takers study any differently for the exam, but we urge all potential exam takers make sure they are adequately prepared.  If an applicant does not pass the 65 or 66 on the first try, they will need to wait 30 days to take the exam again which will obviously have an effect on the timing of a hedge fund launch.

For more information please see NASAA’s post on the Series 65 and Series 66 exams.

Thank you to Chuck Lowenstein for bringing this issue to my attention.

****

Other related hedge fund law articles:

Bart Mallon, Esq. of Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP runs the Hedge Fund Law Blog.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Job Applicant – Fund Accounting and Portfolio Analysis

Leave a reply

Normally I do not use this blog as an area to advertise job openings or the resume’s of prospective job applicants, but I wanted to make an exception for a good friend of mine.  If you know of any career opportunities in portfolio analysis or fund accounting, please let me know.  The following is information on the candidate:

  • Education: MBA, CAIA Candidate
  • Location Preference: Chicago, New York, San Francisco
  • Duties & Responsibilities: preparation and review of monthly valuation reports, annual financial statements and regulatory filings
  • Strengths & Skills: thorough understanding of accounting and administration for hedge fund and mutual fund industries;proven ability to research issues, defend positions, and communicate recommendations; critical thinking, detail oriented, with record of process improvements

CPO Reporting Requirements | Commodity Pool Operator Compliance

3 Replies

CFTC Regulation 4.22 Overview

CFTC registered commodity pool operators have a number of regulatory and compliance issues to be aware of.  In addition to a having a compliance program which addresses the business and regulatory issues applicable to the manager, one of the more important compliance requirements is found in CFTC Regulation 4.22 which provides the reporting framework with respect to (i) periodic reports to investors and (ii) annual reports to investors and the NFA.  While many hedge fund administration firms provide a monthly or quarterly report/statement, generally those reports/statements do not provide the detailed information that is required for commodity pools.  This article provides an overview of the information required to be included in the periodic and annual statements and will also discuss other aspects of the regulation.

Overview of the Statements

Generally CPOs are required to distribute, within 30 days of end of the required period (see below), an account statement to each investor the fund.  The account statement must included an itemized “statement of operations” and “statement of changes in net assets” which is presented and computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

The statement of operations must separately itemize the following:

  • Realized net gain/loss on commodity interest positions
  • Unrealized net gain/loss on commodity interest positions
  • Total net gain/loss on other transactions (including interest and dividends earned), unless the gain/loss from trading are part of a related trading strategy (see 4.22(e)(3))
  • Total management fees during period
  • Total advisory fees during period (including performance fees/allocations)
  • Total brokerage commissions during period
  • Total of other fees for investment transactions
  • Total of other expenses incurred or accrued by the fund during period

Note: most of the above items must be itemized according to 4.22(e)(1) and special allocations should be noted according to 4.22(e)(2).

The statement of changes in net assets must separately itemize the following:

  • Fund NAV at beginning of period
  • Fund NAV at end of period
  • Total contributions to fund during period
  • Total redemptions (voluntary or involuntary) during period
  • Total fund income/loss during period
  • Total value of investor’s interest in the fund at the end of the period

Monthly or Quarterly Commodity Pool Reporting

For funds which have more than $500,000 of assets, the account statements must be sent to investors on a monthly basis.  The account statement is due to the investor within 30 days of the end of the month.  For funds which have less than $500,000 of assets, the account statements must be sent to investors on (at least) a quarterly basis.  The account statement is due to the investor within 30 days of the end of the quarter.  In both cases, a final report for the year does not need to be sent to fund investors if the CPO’s annual report (described below) is sent to pool participants within 45 calendar days after the end of the fiscal year.

Annual Reporting Requirement

The CPO will need to provide, within 90 days after the end of the fund’s fiscal year (or within 90 days of the cessation of trading if the fund closes), an annual report to (i) each investor in the fund and (ii) the NFA.  The annual report must be presented and computed in accordance with GAAP consistently applied and must be audited by an independent public accountant.*

Annual report must include:

  • Fund NAV for the preceding two fiscal years
  • Total value of investor’s interest in the fund at the end of the preceding two fiscal years
  • Statement of Financial Condition for the fund’s fiscal year and preceding fiscal year
  • “statement of operations” and “statement of changes in net assets”
  • Footnotes if required to make statements not misleading (including certain information on underlying funds if the fund invests in other commodity pools)
  • Certain information if there is more than onve ownership class or series.

In the event that the CPO will not be able to file the annual report with the NFA within the 90 day period, the CPO can file an extension under certain circumstances.  It is very important that the CPO provides the annual report on time or files for the exemption.  If a CPO cannot file the report within the time frame required and does not file for the exemption, the NFA will take action against the CPO see CFTC Fines CPOs For Late Annual Reports.

*Note: if the fund is organized offshore then the CPO may be able to prepare and calculate the annual report in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, please generally see 4.22(d)(2).

Statements Required to be Signed by Principals

Both the account statement and the annual report must contain a signed affirmation (usually provided by a principal or associated person of the CPO) that the information contained in the account statement is accurate and complete.

Such information shall include:

  • Name of individual signing
  • Capacity of individual signing
  • Name of the CPO
  • Name of the fund

Other Items

Regulation 4.22 is intricate and there are many specifics for certain fund managers.  Specifically, if a commodity fund invests in other commodity funds there are certain rules which I have not covered in-depth in this overview.

With regard to the fiscal year, most commodity pools will elect to have their fiscal year be the calendar year.  A fund can elect to have the fiscal year end on a different date under certain circumstances, see generally 4.22(g).

With regard to account statements and annual reports, these can be provided to fund investors electronically (either through email or through a password-protected website).  In the event a fund manager wants to provide statements in this way, the manager will need to make sure the commodity pool’s offering documents specifically discusses this possibility.  Additionally, the manager should make sure the fund’s subscription documents include a specific place for the investor to consent to the electronic delivery of the account statement or annual report.

Conclusion

Regulation 4.22 is detailed and, for some groups, complicated.  The NFA has shown a willingness to send a message to firms which do not follow NFA rules or CFTC regulations.  If you are a CPO and have questions with regard to your account statements or annual reports, please feel free to contact us.

****

Other related hedge fund law articles include:

Bart Mallon, Esq. of Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP runs the Hedge Fund Law Blog as well as the forex registration website.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.