April 20, 2023

Clients, Friends, and Associates:

As we end the first quarter and enter the spring season, we would like to highlight some of the recent industry updates and occurrences we found to be both interesting and impactful. While we try to keep these topics at a higher level, please feel free to explore the links included and reach out to us if you have any related questions.

****

CFM Items

We are pleased to announce the addition of John T. Araneo to our firm as Partner to lead our Cybersecurity Law practice. We’d also like to highlight the promotion of Frank J. Martin to Partner and Firm General Counsel. Additionally, we have hired Marcia Delgadillo as Director of Marketing & Business Development to manage our firm’s marketing and business development activities. Please join us in welcoming them all to our firm.

Cole-Frieman & Mallon is hosting a panel discussion on “Navigating the SEC Marketing Rule: Practical Considerations for Fund Managers,” on May 4th in San Francisco. CFM Partner David Rothschild and Senior Associate Malhar Oza will be joined by Managing Director Michael Fitzgerald of TD Cowen and Chief Executive Officer Fizza Khan of Silver Regulatory Associates LLC for a lively discussion. For details, contact [email protected].

****

SEC Matters

SEC Charges Staking-as-a-Service Provider. On February 9, 2023, the Security and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charged Payward Ventures, Inc. and Payward Trading Ltd. (“Kraken”) with failing to register the offer and sale of their crypto asset staking-as-a-service program. In operation since 2019, Kraken’s program allowed public investors to transfer crypto related assets to Kraken for staking in exchange for annual investment returns advertised by Kraken to be as high as 21%. Kraken’s model depended on pooling the assets transferred by investors and staking them on behalf of those investors. The SEC’s complaint alleges that the program produced benefits derived from Kraken’s effort on behalf of investors and that the program should be considered an investment contract subject to registration, disclosure, and safeguard protections required by securities laws. As a result of the charge, Kraken has agreed to cease offering or selling securities through crypto asset staking services and pay $30 million in settlement fees. Although the SEC’s complaint did not allege that staking necessarily always constitutes a security offering, it was determined that this service offered by Kraken did meet the 4-prong test to be considered an investment contract. This signals that the SEC may be increasingly more aggressive at regulating crypto under existing rules and regulations, and managers should consider whether staking services offered by third parties would fit into the Kraken fact pattern.

The SEC’s New Proposed Rule Regarding Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets. In February, the SEC announced a proposed rule to amend the existing “custody rule” applicable to SEC registered investment advisers (“RIAs”) that have custody of client assets. The proposed rule, redesignated as the “safeguarding rule,” imposes potentially significant new requirements on RIAs, including RIAs operating in the digital asset space.

The Existing Custody Rule. As background, the existing custody rule requires any RIA that has custody of client assets to keep “client funds and securities” with a “qualified custodian” at all times. To-date practitioners have debated the extent to which digital assets are captured in the definition of “client funds and securities” and thus whether these requirements apply to RIAs with custody of clients’ digital assets. A qualified custodian generally is a federal or state-chartered bank or savings association, certain trust companies, a registered broker-dealer, a registered futures commission merchant, or certain foreign financial institutions.

Key Elements of the Proposed Safeguarding Rule. The proposed safeguarding rule would make several important changes to the custody rule. Most importantly to digital asset managers, it would expand the existing custody requirements to cover all “client assets” over which an RIA has custody, explicitly including digital assets. It would also require RIAs to enter into written agreements with qualified custodians to ensure basic custodial protections are in place, including requiring a qualified custodian to obtain written internal control reports that include an opinion of an independent public accountant regarding the adequacy of the qualified custodian’s controls. The proposed safeguarding rule would provide a transition period of one year for large advisers and 18 months for smaller advisers to comply with the new rule.

Potential Implications for Crypto RIAs. If implemented as drafted, the proposed safeguarding rule would require RIAs who operate in the digital asset space to custody their digital assets with qualified custodians at all times – no exceptions. While qualified custodians exist today that can custody certain digital assets, there are no qualified custodians that can custody all digital assets. Moreover, when a crypto RIA wants to trade digital assets on an exchange, the crypto RIA would have to move digital assets out of a qualified custodian and on to the crypto exchange. There are currently no crypto exchanges that are qualified custodians, so it may be impossible for crypto RIAs to comply with the proposed safeguarding rule at all times. If adopted as proposed, RIAs could find it much harder to operate in the digital asset space.

Next Steps. We encourage our clients to review the proposed rule and consider submitting comments to the SEC highlighting potential issues and ways to improve the proposed rule. Comments should be received on or before May 8, 2023. Electronic comments may be submitted via the SEC’s internet comment form or by sending an email to [email protected]. Commenters should include File Number S7-04-23 on the subject line if submitting by email. After the May 8, 2023, comment deadline, the staff of the SEC will review the comments and potentially revise the proposed rule. The proposed rule, and any revisions to it, would only become effective after the SEC commissioners vote to approve it as a final rule.

The SEC’s Proposed Cyber Risk Management Rule for Investment Advisers. Last February, the SEC released a proposed rule that portends to create an entirely new cybersecurity compliance regime for investment advisers and certain funds. This new set of cybersecurity risk management rules (the “Cyber Risk Management Rule”) will be codified by amendments to both the Investment Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act. As drafted, the Cyber Risk Management Rule has four (4) cornerstone components: (i) policies and procedures; (ii) a new regulatory reporting regime (including a 48-hour notification period for alerting the SEC of a cybersecurity breach); (iii) cybersecurity disclosure obligations; and (iv) recordkeeping requirements. The Cyber Risk Management Rule was set for a final vote this month, however on March 15, 2023 the SEC unexpectedly reopened its comment period for an additional sixty (60) days, while simultaneously issuing three (3) additional cybersecurity related rule proposals, each with some connective tissue with the Cyber Risk Management Rule.

Cybersecurity continues to be a top priority at the SEC and it has made clear that a new, more mature and comprehensive cybersecurity compliance regime is imminent. Advisers and funds who may mistakenly kick the cybersecurity can down the road in 2023 will likely do so at their peril, primarily for two reasons. First, the SEC still requires registrants to comply with its current cybersecurity requirements, to wit, conducting annual assessments and implementing reasonable policies, procedures, and controls across the core seven (7) elements that constitute a model cybersecurity program (governance and periodic assessments; access rights and controls; data loss prevention; mobile security; incident response; vendor management; and training and awareness (collectively, the “Cyber 7”)). Second, the new regime, via proposed rule 206(4)-9 of the Investment Advisers Act, will actually make it unlawful for a registered adviser to provide investment advice to clients if it fails to adopt and implement these policies and procedures and conduct these periodic assessments. This rule alone is a clear, direct statutory line in the sand that adds one more arrow in the quiver of the SEC’s ample Cyber Unit, which continues to actively pursue penalties against those registrants that fail to meet these threshold requirements.

Fortunately, since the new Cyber Risk Management Rule takes a cumulative approach in setting these new cyber standards, virtually all the advancements asset managers have made in complying with the current Cyber 7 since 2015 will be relevant and accretive to the new requirements. Cybersecurity is indeed a process, as opposed to a project. Demonstrating continued engagement and reasonable progress is the key to cracking the code on cybersecurity compliance, at least in terms of meeting regulatory requirements and the ODD expectations of institutional investors. And thus, advisers need to act now in either creating or sufficiently maintaining an appropriately scaled model cybersecurity set of policies, procedures and controls (a “Cybersecurity Program”). The Firm’s Cybersecurity Law Practice Group is available to assist our clients with any questions or concerns regarding virtually any aspect of cybersecurity compliance.

SEC and NYDFS Commence Actions Against Paxos. The New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) recently ordered Paxos Trust Company (“Paxos”) to cease minting Paxos-issued BUSD, a fiat-backed stablecoin issued by Binance and Paxos. Each BUSD token is backed 1:1 with US dollars held in reserve. On February 13, 2023, Paxos notified customers of its intent to end its relationship with Binance as a result of the order.

In conjunction with the order from the NYDFS, Paxos reports that it received a Wells notice from the SEC on February 3, 2023. According to a press release from Paxos, the Wells notice states the SEC is considering enforcement action against Paxos alleging that BUSD is an unregistered security. The actions by the NYDFS and SEC could have important implications for stablecoins since it appears that regulators are taking the stance that fiat-backed stablecoins could be securities even though they are intended to function as currency and there would not be an expectation of profit simply by owning them. Moreover, the NYDFS order and SEC Wells notice only appear to target BUSD, while Paxos separately issues a second fiat-backed stablecoin called USDP. It is unclear why USDP appears to be spared so we await further action by regulators and will monitor this situation.

SEC Files Wells Notice Against Coinbase. Coinbase Global Inc. (“Coinbase”) also recently received a Wells notice from the SEC, targeting Coinbase’s staking service Coinbase Earn, Coinbase Prime, and Coinbase Wallet. The Wells notice stems from an SEC investigation conducted into Coinbase in the summer of 2022. Our firm will continue to closely monitor the situation with Coinbase for new developments.

SEC Releases a “Frequently Asked Questions” Page for the Marketing Rule. In January, the SEC released a FAQ page for questions stemming from its recently enacted rule 206(4)-1 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Marketing Rule.”) The page currently provides responses to three commonly asked questions—most notably regarding its gross and net performance rules—clarifying that when an RIA displays the gross performance of one investment or a group of investments from a private fund, the RIA must show the net performance of the single investment and/or the group of investments, respectively. The SEC noted that they will be updating this page periodically to respond to questions related to the Marketing Rule, and clients should reach out with any specific questions relating to the new Marketing Rule. Our firm will be hosting an event on May 4th to be a discussion of the practical considerations for fund managers under the recently reviewed marking rule, and hope that you all will join us.

Judge Rules that Emojis in a Tweet may Constitute “Financial Advice.” A United States District Court judge recently ruled that the use of emojis can be construed in certain circumstances to meet a factor in the legal test to determine whether an individual is providing financial advice. Specifically, the judge denied the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, finding that the defendant-company’s use of a rocket ship, stock chart, and money bag emojis in a recent tweet “objectively meant one thing: a financial return on investment.” The emojis were displayed alongside statements touting recent NFT purchase prices on the company’s website, presumably indicating future gains on such NFTs. While the decision specifically rules on the three emojis mentioned above, we advise our clients to use caution in their use of any emojis, whether that be in public or private communications regarding fund matters. In any event, any communications should not be misleading and in accordance with the advisers act and the new marketing rule (if applicable).

****

Digital Asset Matters

Liability Issues and Third-Party Engagement in DAOs. As the formation of and investment in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (“DAOs”) continue to garner attention within the investment community, it is important for DAO participants to continue to analyze how they participate. First, as noted in our July 2022 Quarterly Update, managers should consider only participating or investing in DAOs that are wrapped in a liability blocking entity in order to reduce the risk of personal liability. Second, as an added measure of liability protection, managers should consider participating or investing through special purpose vehicles specific to such activity (e.g., a fund making two DAO investments could segregate each investment through separate, wholly-owned subsidiaries). Third, managers should consider only participating or investing in DAOs that have engaged reputable third-party service providers such as administrators, accountants, tax counsel and, in the case of foreign foundations, independent directors. The use of such independent third-party service providers may help ensure proper functioning and allocation of resources of the DAO, thereby helping to protect its participants.

****

Other Items

The Ninth Circuit Blocks California’s Ban on Mandatory Arbitration Agreements. On February 15, 2023, a three-judge panel for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a California bill which would have prevented employers from requiring employees to sign arbitration agreements as a condition of employment. The court held that California Assembly Bill 51 is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act, which “embodies a national policy favoring arbitration.” After years of uncertainty surrounding the issue, the decision solidifies that employers in California can continue to include mandatory arbitration provisions in their employment agreements.

****

Compliance Calendar

As you plan your regulatory compliance timeline for the coming months, please keep the following dates in mind:

April 7, 2023

• Form N-MFP Filing for Monthly Schedule of Portfolio Holdings of Money Market Funds, if applicable.

April 10, 2023

• Form 13H Quarterly Filing for Changes. Filing is for calendar quarter that ended March 31, 2023 and should be submitted within 10 days of quarter end. 
• Form 13G Monthly Filing for Applicable Reporting Persons. Filing is for month end of March 31, 2023, and should be submitted within 10 days of month end. 

April 15, 2023

• Form PF Quarterly Filing for Large Liquidity Fund Advisers. Filing is for calendar quarter that ended March 31, 2023.

April 30, 2023

• Form ADV Part 2A Delivery to Existing Clients. 
• Audited Financials Distribution to Private Fund Investors (excluding Fund of Funds).
• Form PF Annual Filing. Filing is for fiscal year end December 31, 2022 and should be submitted within 120 days of fiscal year end. 

May 10, 2023

• Form 13G Monthly Filing for Applicable Reporting Persons. Filing is for month end of April 31, 2023, and should be submitted within 10 days of month end. 

May 15, 2023

• Form 13F Quarterly Filing for Changes. Filing is for Calendar Quarter that ended March 31, 2023 and should generally be submitted within 45 days of quarter end.
• Form CTA-PR Filing with the NFA, which can be filed through NFA’s EasyFile.

May 30, 2023

• Form CPO-PQR Filing with the NFA, which can be filed through NFA’s EasyFile.
• Form PF Quarterly Filing for Large Hedge Fund Traders and Large Liquidity Fund Advisers, if applicable.
• Form N-PORT Filing Monthly Schedule of Portfolio Holdings of Funds other than Money Markey Funds and SBICs, if applicable. 

 June 7, 2023

• Form N-MFP Filing for Monthly Schedule of Portfolio Holdings of Money Market Funds, if applicable. 

June 10, 2023

• Form 13G Monthly Filing for Applicable Reporting Persons. Filing is for month end of May 31, 2023, and should be submitted within 10 days of month end. 
• Audited Financials Distribution to Fund of Funds Investors. 

Periodic

• Fund Managers should perform “Bad Actor” certifications annually.
• Form D and Blue Sky Filings should be current.
• CPO/CTA Annual Questionnaires must be submitted annually, and promptly upon material information changes, through NFA Annual Questionnaire system.

Consult our complete Compliance Calendar for all 2023 critical dates as you plan your regulatory compliance timeline for the year. 

Please contact us with any questions or assistance regarding compliance, registration, or planning issues on any of the above topics.

Sincerely,

Karl Cole-Frieman, Bart Mallon, Lilly Palmer, David Rothschild, Scott Kitchens, Tony Wise, Alex Yastremski, Garret Filler, Frank J. Martin, and John T. Araneo

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is a leading investment management law firm known for providing top-tier, innovative, and collaborative legal solutions for complex financial services matters. Headquartered in San Francisco, Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP services both start-up investment managers and multibillion-dollar funds. The firm provides a full suite of legal services to the investment management community, including fund formation (hedge, VC, PE, real estate), investment adviser and CPO registration, counterparty documentation (digital and traditional prime brokerage, ISDA, repo, and vendor agreements), SEC, CFTC, NFA and FINRA matters (inquiries, exams, and compliance issues), seed deals, cybersecurity regulatory matters, full-service intellectual property counsel, manager due diligence, employment and compensation matters, and routine business matters. The firm also publishes the prominent Hedge Fund Law Blog. For more information, please add us on LinkedIn, follow us on Twitter, and visit us at colefrieman.com.

TRANSITIONS MATTER.

Done well, they are the first step in a new and exciting chapter for senior investment management professionals. Gone wrong, they can lead to years of acrimonious litigation and missed professional opportunities. When senior investment management employees or partners leave their current firms to join another or start their own, navigating this critical moment requires a deep understanding of the legal and contractual basis of their current arrangements, an honest understanding of the relationship between the principal and their current firm, and a clear set of objectives.

At Cole-Frieman & Mallon (“CFM”), our Principals in Transition practice focuses on the Three Ps – Protecting the departing principal’s economics, Preventing limitations on future professional endeavors, and Preserving the relationship with the principal’s current firm. Protect, Prevent, Preserve. We are industry experts, not employment law litigators, and our ecosystem expertise is both our strategic advantage in these negotiations and an important message to the principal’s current organization that preservation of the relationship is important. We come to facilitate a smooth and fair transition, not to write demand letters or instigate litigation. We achieve this by: 1) bringing our fund expertise when analyzing current partnership agreements, 2) our knowledge of California’s and other jurisdictions’ public policy against non-competition including overreaching non-solicit clauses and overly broad confidentiality restrictions that courts have ruled operate as non-competes, and 3) an understanding that while the investment management ecosystem is global in nature, it is a small community and relationships (among managers, allocators, and LPs) matter.

All of this is done without limiting the principal’s ability to escalate if necessary. There is a time and place for litigation, and when it becomes clear that the best route for our client is litigation, transitioning from the Three Ps approach to another tactic with litigation counsel is seamless.

Protect your economics. Partnership agreements and carried interest grant agreements are complex documents with many hidden (and not so hidden) powers vested in the controlling parties. Understanding how investment funds and the economics of investment funds work is our specialty.

Prevent limitations on future professional endeavors. Few people leave investment managers intending to leave the industry. Most, in fact, are leaving to start their own venture or join another investment manager doing substantially similar work. The key to these negotiations is to ensure that whatever limitations are connected to future economic benefits from the principal’s previous organization are narrowly tailored. Central to this is understanding the principal’s statutory and common law rights in California and other jurisdictions that have a public policy against non-competition agreements. In furtherance of this public policy, California and other state courts have become increasingly hostile to non-solicit and overly broad confidentiality agreements that operate to restrain a person’s ability to work.

Preserve your relationship. CFM’s approach is designed to preserve the relationship with the principal’s current investment manager. The elements necessary to achieve this are: 1) being reasonable in the principal’s requests on economics and limitations, 2) approaching the negotiations collaboratively, 3) having a clear understanding of the other side’s objectives and finding ways to get them what they need from the transition, and 4) being thoughtful in whom you hire to handle this transition. Because CFM is embedded in the investment management ecosystem, hiring our firm in these matters signals the principal’s desire to “get the numbers right,” to ensure that the principal has the freedom they need to start their next endeavor, and perhaps most importantly that this will all be achieved in a collaborative way.

Authored by Frank J. Martin, Partner & General Counsel at Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP

December 2022

Clients, Friends, Associates:

As we near the end of 2022, we have highlighted some recent industry updates that we believe may impact our clients. We have also developed a checklist to help managers effectively oversee the business and regulatory landscape for the coming year. While we strive to present an informative, albeit brief, overview of these topics, we are also available should you have any related questions.

This update includes the following:

• Q4 Matters
• Annual Compliance & Other Items
• Annual Fund Matters
• Annual Management Company Matters
• Notable Regulatory & Other Items from 2022
• Compliance Calendar

****

Q4 Matters

New York Federal Reserve Digital Dollar Pilot Project. In collaboration with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and several private sector financial institutions, the New York Innovation Center (“NYIC”) recently announced a pilot program to test the operability of digital asset transactions between financial institutions using the U.S. dollar as token. Although the project is being conducted in a purely experimental fashion using simulated data, the pilot can be seen as one of the first steps taken by a governmental agency towards creating a central bank digital currency.

SEC v. LBRY. In November, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted the SEC’s motion for summary judgment against LBRY, Inc., holding that LBRY offered a crypto asset in violation of the registration provisions of federal securities laws. The case addresses a fundamental issue in the crypto universe — whether blockchain tokens are considered securities by the SEC.  The Court concluded that LBRY’s messaging would lead potential investors to understand that the company was pitching speculative value propositions for its digital token that created an expectation of profits under the Howey test.  We generally advise that managers and others in the digital asset space should assume that the SEC considers all blockchain tokens to be securities, subject to SEC regulation and applicable registration requirements. 

FTX. Our firm, like many others, continues to develop our understanding of the recent events related to FTX, what users of the exchange can and should expect going forward, and how it will affect the digital asset space generally. We have included links to our initial blog post and podcast below touching on the FTX situation. Stay tuned for additional information through multiple channels in the days and weeks ahead.

• Blog Post: https://hedgefundlawblog.com/crypto-fund-offering-documents-post-ftx-collapse.html
• Tokens of Wisdom Podcast: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2082177/share

****

Annual Compliance & Other Items

Annual Privacy Policy Notice. On an annual basis, SEC-registered investment advisers (“SEC RIAs”) are required to provide natural person clients with a copy of the firm’s privacy policy if: (i) the SEC RIA has disclosed nonpublic personal information other than in connection with servicing consumer accounts or administering financial products; or (ii) the firm’s privacy policy has changed. The SEC has provided a model form and accompanying instructions for firm privacy policies. 

Annual Compliance Review. The Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) of a registered investment advisor (“RIA”) must conduct a review of the adviser’s compliance policies and procedures annually. This annual compliance review should be in writing and presented to senior management. CCOs should consider additions, revisions, and updates to the compliance program as may be necessary. We recommend firms discuss the annual review with their outside counsel or compliance firm to obtain guidance about the review process and a template for the assessment. Conversations regarding the annual review may raise sensitive matters, and advisers should ensure that these discussions are protected by attorney-client privilege. Advisers that are not registered may still wish to review their procedures and/or implement a compliance program as a best practice.

Form ADV Annual Amendment. RIAs or managers filing as exempt reporting advisers (“ERAs”) with the SEC or a state securities authority must file an annual amendment to their Form ADV within 90 days of the end of their fiscal year. For most managers, the Form ADV amendment will be due on March 31, 2023. RIAs must provide a copy of the updated Form ADV Part 2A brochure and Part 2B brochure supplement (or a summary of changes with an offer to provide the complete brochure) to each “client” and, if applicable, Part 3 (Form CRS: Client Relationship Summary) to each “retail investor” with which the RIA has entered into an investment advisory contract. Note that for SEC RIAs to private investment vehicles, a “client” for purposes of this rule refers to the vehicle(s) managed by the adviser and not the underlying investors. State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client.” For purposes of the Form ADV Part 3, a “retail investor” means a natural person, or the legal representative of such natural person, who seeks to receive or receives services primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.

Switching to/from SEC Regulation.

SEC Registration. Managers who no longer qualify for SEC registration as of the time of filing the annual Form ADV amendment must withdraw from SEC registration within 180 days after the end of their fiscal year (June 30, 2023, for most managers), by filing a Form ADV-W. Such managers should consult with legal counsel to determine whether they are required to register in the states in which they conduct business. Managers who are required to register with the SEC as of the date of their annual amendment must register with the SEC within 90 days of filing the annual amendment (June 30, 2023, for most managers, assuming the annual amendment is filed on March 31, 2023).

Exempt Reporting Advisers. Managers who no longer meet the definition of an ERA will need to submit a final report as an ERA and apply for registration with the SEC or the relevant state securities authority, as applicable, generally within 90 days after the filing of the annual amendment (June 30, 2023, for most managers, assuming the annual amendment is filed on March 31, 2023).

Custody Rule Annual Audit.

SEC RIAs. SEC RIAs must comply with specific custody procedures, including: (i) maintaining client funds and securities with a qualified custodian; (ii) having a reasonable basis to believe that the qualified custodian sends an account statement to each advisory client at least quarterly; and (iii) undergoing an annual surprise examination conducted by an independent public accountant.

SEC RIAs to pooled investment vehicles may avoid both the quarterly statement and surprise examination requirements by having audited financial statements prepared for each pooled investment vehicle in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) by an independent public accountant registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). Audited financial statements must be sent to investors in the fund within 120 days after the fund’s fiscal year-end (or for fund-of-fund clients, within 180 days after fiscal year-end). SEC RIAs should review their internal procedures to ensure compliance with the custody rules.

California RIAs. California-registered investment advisers (“CA RIAs”) that manage pooled investment vehicles and are deemed to have custody of client assets are also subject to independent party surprise examinations. However, CA RIAs can avoid these additional requirements by engaging a PCAOB-registered auditor to prepare and distribute audited financial statements to all beneficial owners of the pooled investment vehicle, and the Commissioner of the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (“DFPI”). Those CA RIAs that do not engage an auditor must, among other things: (i) provide notice of such custody on the Form ADV; (ii) maintain client assets with a qualified custodian; (iii) engage an independent party to act in the best interest of investors to review fees, expenses, and withdrawals; and (iv) retain an independent certified public accountant to conduct surprise examinations of assets.

Other State RIAs. Advisers registered in other states  should consult their legal counsel about those states’ specific custody requirements.

California Minimum Net Worth Requirement and Financial Reports.

CA RIAs with Discretion. Every CA RIA (other than those also registered as broker-dealers) that has discretionary authority over client funds or securities, regardless of if they have custody, must maintain a net worth of at least $10,000 (CA RIAs with custody are subject to heightened minimum net worth requirements, discussed further below).

CA RIAs with Custody. Generally, every CA RIA (other than those also registered as broker-dealers) that has custody of client funds or securities must maintain a minimum net worth of $35,000. However, a CA RIA that: (i) is deemed to have custody solely because it acts as the general partner of a limited partnership, or a comparable position for another type of pooled investment vehicle; and (ii) otherwise complies with the California custody rule described above is exempt from the $35,000 minimum (and instead is required to maintain the $10,000 minimum).

Financial Reports. Every CA RIA subject to the above minimum net worth requirements must file certain reports with the DFPI. In addition to annual reports, CA RIAs may be required to file interim reports or reports of financial condition if they fall below certain net worth thresholds.

Annual Re-Certification of CFTC Exemptions. Commodity pool operators (“CPOs”) and commodity trading advisers (“CTAs”) currently relying on certain exemptions from registration with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) are required to re-certify their eligibility within 60 days of the calendar year-end. A common example includes the 4.13(a)(3) exemption also known as the “de minimis” exemption. CPOs and CTAs currently relying on relevant exemptions should consult with legal counsel to evaluate whether they remain eligible to rely on such exemptions.

CPO and CTA Annual Updates. Registered CPOs and CTAs must prepare and file Annual Questionnaires and Annual Registration Updates with the National Futures Association (“NFA”), as well as submit payment for annual maintenance fees and NFA membership dues. Registered CPOs must also prepare and file their fourth-quarter report for each commodity pool on Form CPO-PQR, while CTAs must file their fourth-quarter report on Form CTA-PR. Unless eligible to claim relief under Regulation 4.7, registered CPOs and CTAs must update their disclosure documents periodically, as they may not use any document dated more than 12 months prior to the date of its intended use. Disclosure documents that are materially inaccurate or incomplete must be promptly corrected, and redistributed to pool participants.

Trade Errors. Managers should ensure that all trade errors are properly addressed pursuant to the manager’s trade errors policies by the end of the year. Documentation of trade errors should be finalized, and if the manager is required to reimburse any of its funds or other clients, it should do so by year-end.

Soft Dollars. Managers that participate in soft dollar programs should make sure that they have addressed any commission balances from the previous year.

Schedule 13G/D and Section 16 Filings. Managers who exercise investment discretion over accounts (including funds and separately managed accounts) that are beneficial owners of 5% or more of a registered voting equity security must report these positions on Schedule 13D or 13G. Passive investors are generally eligible to file the short-form Schedule 13G, which is updated annually within 45 days of the end of the year. Schedule 13D is required when a manager is ineligible to file Schedule 13G and is due 10 days after acquiring more than 5% beneficial ownership of a registered voting equity security. For managers who are also making Section 16 filings, this is an opportune time to review your filings to confirm compliance and anticipate needs for the first quarter.

Section 16 filings are required for “corporate insiders” (including beneficial owners of 10% or more of a registered voting equity security). An initial Form 3 is due within 10 days after becoming an “insider”; Form 4 reports ownership changes and is due by the end of the second business day after an ownership change; and Form 5 reports any transactions that should have been reported earlier on a Form 4 or were eligible for deferred reporting and is due within 45 days after the end of each fiscal year.

Form 13F. A manager must file a Form 13F if it exercises investment discretion with respect to $100 million or more in certain “Section 13F securities” within 45 days after the end of the year in which the manager reaches the $100 million filing threshold. The SEC lists the securities subject to 13F reporting on its website.

Form 13H. Managers who meet one of the SEC’s large trader thresholds (generally, managers whose transactions in exchange-listed securities equal or exceed two million shares or $20 million during any calendar day, or 20 million shares or $200 million during any calendar month) are required to file an initial Form 13H with the SEC within 10 days of crossing a threshold. Large traders also need to amend Form 13H annually within 45 days of the end of the year. In addition, changes to the information on Form 13H will require interim amendments following the calendar quarter in which the change occurred.

Form PF. Managers to private funds that are either registered with the SEC or required to be registered with the SEC and who have at least $150 million in regulatory assets under management (“RAUM”) must file a Form PF. Private advisers with less than $1.5 billion in RAUM must file Form PF annually within 120 days of their fiscal year-end. Private advisers with $1.5 billion or more in RAUM must file Form PF within 60 days of the end of each fiscal quarter.

Form MA. Investment advisers that provide advice on municipal financial products are considered “municipal advisors” by the SEC and must file a Form MA annually, within 90 days of their fiscal year-end.

SEC Form D. Form D filings for most funds need to be amended annually, on or before the anniversary of the most recently filed Form D. Copies of Form D are publicly available on the SEC’s EDGAR website.

Blue Sky Filings. On an annual basis, a manager should review its blue sky filings for each state to make sure it has met any initial and renewal filing requirements. Several states impose late fees or reject late filings altogether. Accordingly, it is critical to stay on top of filing deadlines for both new investors and renewals. We also recommend that managers review blue sky filing submission requirements. Many states now permit blue sky filings to be filed electronically through the Electronic Filing Depository (“EFD”) system, and certain states will now only accept filings through EFD.

IARD Annual Fees. Preliminary annual renewal fees for state-registered and SEC-registered investment advisers are due on December 13, 2022. Failure to submit electronic payments by the deadline may result in registrations terminating due to a “failure to renew.” If you have not already done so, you should submit full payment into your Renewal Account by E-Bill, check, or wire as soon as possible. 

Pay-to-Play and Lobbyist Rules. SEC rules disqualify investment advisers, their key personnel, and placement agents acting on their behalf from seeking to be engaged by a governmental client if they have made certain political contributions. State and local governments have similar rules, including California, which requires internal sales professionals who meet the definition of “placement agents” (people who act for compensation as finders, solicitors, marketers, consultants, brokers, or other intermediaries in connection with offering or selling investment advisory services to a state public retirement system in California) to register with the state as lobbyists and comply with California lobbyist reporting and regulatory requirements. Note that managers offering or selling investment advisory services to local government entities must register as lobbyists in the applicable cities and counties. State laws on lobbyist registration differ significantly, so managers should carefully review reporting requirements in the states in which they operate to make sure they comply with the relevant rules.

****

Annual Fund Matters

New Issue Status. On an annual basis, managers need to confirm or reconfirm the eligibility of investors that participate in initial public offerings, or new issues, pursuant to both Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) Rules 5130 and 5131. Most managers reconfirm investor eligibility via negative consent (i.e., investors are informed of their status on file with the manager and are asked to notify the manager of any changes), whereby a failure to respond by any investor operates as consent to its current status.
 
ERISA Status. Given the significant problems that can occur from not properly tracking ERISA investors in private funds, we recommend that managers confirm or reconfirm on an annual basis the ERISA status of their investors. This is particularly important for managers that track the underlying percentage of ERISA funds for each investor, with respect to each class of interests in a pooled investment vehicle.
 
Wash Sales. Managers should carefully manage wash sales for year-end. Failure to do so could result in book/tax differences for investors. Certain dealers can provide managers with swap strategies to manage wash sales, including Basket Total Return Swaps and Split Strike Forward Conversion. These strategies should be considered carefully to make sure they are consistent with the investment objectives of the fund.
 
Redemption Management. Managers with significant redemptions at the end of the year should carefully manage unwinding positions to minimize transaction costs in the current year (that could impact performance) and prevent transaction costs from impacting remaining investors in the next year. When closing funds or managed accounts, managers should pay careful attention to the liquidation procedures in the fund constituent documents and the managed account agreement.
 
NAV Triggers and Waivers. Managers should promptly seek waivers of any applicable termination events specified in a fund’s International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) or other counterparty agreement that may be triggered by redemptions, performance, or a combination of both at the end of the year (NAV declines are common counterparty agreement termination events).
 
Fund Expenses. Managers should wrap up all fund expenses for 2022 if they have not already done so. In particular, managers should contact their outside legal counsel to obtain accurate and up to date information about legal expenses for inclusion in the NAV for year-end performance.
 
Electronic Schedule K-1s. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) authorizes partnerships and limited liability companies taxed as partnerships to issue Schedule K-1s to investors solely by electronic means, provided the partnership has received the investors’ affirmative consent. States may have different rules regarding electronic K-1s, and partnerships should check with their counsel whether they may be required to send hard copy state K-1s. Partnerships must also provide each investor with specific disclosures that include a description of the hardware and software necessary to access the electronic K-1s, how long the consent is effective, and the procedures for withdrawing the consent. If you would like to send K-1s to your investors electronically, you should discuss your options with your service providers.
 
“Bad Actor” Recertification Requirement. A security offering cannot rely on the Rule 506 safe harbor from SEC registration if the issuer or its “covered persons” are “bad actors.” Fund managers must determine whether they are subject to the bad actor disqualification any time they are offering or selling securities in reliance on Rule 506. The SEC has advised that an issuer may reasonably rely on a covered person’s agreement to provide notice of a potential or actual bad actor triggering event pursuant to contractual covenants, bylaw requirements, or undertakings in a questionnaire or certification. However, if an offering is continuous, delayed or long-lived, issuers must periodically update their factual inquiry through a bring-down of representations, questionnaires, and certifications, negative consent letters, reexamination of public databases or other means, depending on the circumstances. Fund managers should consult with counsel to determine how frequently such an update is required. As a matter of practice, most fund managers should perform these updates at least annually.
 
U.S. FATCA. Funds should monitor their compliance with the U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”). Generally, U.S. FATCA reports are due to the IRS on March 31, 2023, or September 30, 2023, depending on where the fund is domiciled. However, reports may be required by an earlier date for jurisdictions that are parties to intergovernmental agreements (“IGAs”) with the U.S. Additionally, the U.S. may require that reports be submitted through the appropriate local tax authority in the applicable IGA jurisdiction, rather than the IRS. Given the varying U.S. FATCA requirements applicable to different jurisdictions, managers should review and confirm the specific U.S. FATCA reporting requirements that may apply. As a reminder, we strongly encourage managers to file the required reports and notifications, even if they already missed previous deadlines. Applicable jurisdictions may be increasing enforcement and monitoring of FATCA reporting and imposing penalties for each day late.
 
CRS. Funds should also monitor their compliance with the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Common Reporting Standard (“CRS”). All “Financial Institutions” in the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) and the Cayman Islands must register with the respective jurisdiction’s Tax Information Authority and submit various reports with the applicable regulator via the associated online portal. Managers to funds domiciled in other jurisdictions should also confirm whether any CRS reporting will be required in such jurisdictions and the procedures required to enroll and file annual reports. We recommend managers contact their tax advisors to stay on top of the U.S. FATCA and CRS requirements and avoid potential penalties.

****

Annual Management Company Matters

Management Company Expenses. Managers who distribute profits annually should attempt to address management company expenses in the year they are incurred. If ownership or profit percentages are adjusted at the end of the year, a failure to manage expenses could significantly impact the economics of the partnership or the management company.

Employee Reviews. An effective annual review process is vital to reduce the risk of employment-related litigation and protect the management company in the event of such litigation. Moreover, it is an opportunity to provide context for bonuses, compensation adjustments, employee goals, and other employee-facing matters at the firm. It is never too late to put an annual review process in place.

Compensation Planning. In the fund industry, and the financial services industry in general, the end of the year is the appropriate time to make adjustments to compensation programs. Because much of a manager’s revenue is tied to annual income from incentive fees, any changes to the management company structure, affiliated partnerships, or any shadow equity programs should be effective on the first of the year. Partnership agreements and operating agreements should be appropriately updated to reflect any such changes.

Insurance. If a manager carries director and officer or other liability insurance, the policy should be reviewed annually to ensure that the manager has provided notice to the carrier of all claims and all potential claims. Newly launched funds should also be added to the policy as necessary.

Other Tax Considerations. Fund managers should assess their overall tax position and consider several steps to optimize tax liability. Managers should also be aware of self-employment taxes, which can potentially be minimized by structuring the investment manager as a limited partnership. Several steps are available to optimize tax liability, including: (i) changing the incentive fee to an incentive allocation; (ii) use of stock-settled stock appreciation rights; (iii) if appropriate, terminating swaps and realizing net losses; (iv) making a Section 481(a) election under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”); (v) making a Section 475 election under the Code; and (vi) making charitable contributions. Managers should consult legal and tax professionals to evaluate whether any of these options are appropriate.

****

Notable Regulatory & Other Items from 2022

SEC Matters

SEC Risk Alert on Material Non-Public Information Compliance Issues. In April, the SEC released a risk alert summarizing the most common compliance deficiencies of both registered and unregistered investment advisers. Of note were (1) the lack of written policies to prevent the misuse of material non-public information (“MNPI”) and (2) the lack of compliance with the reporting requirements for “Access Persons” under the Code of Ethics Rule. All advisers should periodically revisit their written policies and procedures for the use of MNPI and registered investment advisers should review their Code of Ethics and establish reporting requirements for their Access Persons.

Enforcement Action for Misrepresenting Fees. The SEC instituted an enforcement action against a venture capital fund adviser and its CEO for misrepresenting their management fees as “industry standard 2 and 20” when they collected 10 years of management fees up front. This was misleading because it led investors to believe they would be charged an annual 2% management fee, rather than 20% of their total investment up front. The SEC also found that the adviser breached operating agreements by making inter-fund loans and cash transfers between funds. The adviser and its CEO agreed to a cease-and-desist order, returned funds, and paid penalties. In addition to confirming that the fund administrator reviews the offering documents and follows the mechanics for charging fees described therein, we recommend advisers closely review marketing materials with legal counsel or compliance consultants for any misleading or subjective statements.

Insider Trading in the Digital Asset Space. In 2022, the SEC charged a former Coinbase employee and two others with insider trading and a high-ranking employee of OpenSea was indicted for wire fraud and money laundering. The actions indicate the willingness of federal and state officials to enforce regulations applicable to traditional finance in the digital assets space and that law enforcement is ready to tackle unsavory business practices and to attempt to provide greater consumer protections. While insider trading remains an unsettled area of law in the digital asset space, concepts of fraud are well established, malleable, and largely immune from claims that certain digital assets are not “securities.”

Adviser Liable for Late Audit Distribution. The SEC charged an RIA with Custody Rule and compliance violations for failing to complete an audit within 120 days of the private fund’s fiscal year end. The SEC found that the adviser failed to have required audits performed and failed to deliver audited financial statements to investors in certain funds from 2014 onward, and in certain other funds from 2018 onward. The adviser consented to a cease-and-desist order, a censure, a monetary penalty, and to provide a notice of the Order to past and current investors in the fund. This enforcement action serves as a reminder to all advisers to remain vigilant and stay on top of their auditors to complete and distribute the annual fund audit in a timely fashion.

SEC Doubles Size of Crypto Enforcement Unit. The SEC announced the allocation of 20 additional positions to a Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit (formerly the Cyber Unit) to protect investors in crypto markets from cyber-related threats. The expanded Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit will focus on investigating securities law violations related to crypto asset offerings, crypto asset exchanges, crypto asset lending and staking, decentralized finance, NFTs, and stable coins.  We think this is a step in the right direction; it is clear the SEC recognizes that the digital asset space is growing and that greater resources need to be brought to bear on the industry. 

New Marketing Rule for SEC Registered Investment Advisers. By November 4, 2022, all SEC RIA are required to be in full compliance with the SEC’s new marketing rules. As discussed in our 2021 Half Year Update, the new rule replaces the existing cash solicitation and advertising rules, with the most notable change being the allowance of testimonials and endorsements in a RIA’s marketing materials. Given the new rule’s detailed amendments and its significance to our investment adviser clients, we will soon publish a “Frequently Asked Questions” article addressing the specific changes and what they mean for investment advisers going forward. Please keep an eye out for this post on the Hedge Fund Law Blog in the coming weeks.

SEC Charges Investment Advisers for Non-Compliance with Reporting Requirements. In September, the SEC conducted a compliance sweep and charged nine investment advisers for various violations, including failing to deliver audited financial statements to investors in a timely manner, failing to promptly file required amendments to the adviser’s Form ADV upon receipt of audited financial statements, failing to properly describe the status of financial statement audits in the Form ADV, and other violations of Rule 206(4)-2 (the “Custody Rule”) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). Without admitting fault, all the advisers settled with the SEC and agreed to censure and penalties totaling over $1 million. These enforcement actions highlight the importance of compliance with the Custody Rule and its associated reporting requirements, as well as serve as a reminder to regularly review the Form ADV for accuracy and file timely updates as needed. Further, as specifically identified by the SEC in many of these enforcement actions, if you select “Report Not Yet Received” in Item 23(h) of Section 7.B(1) of the Form ADV regarding a private fund’s audited financial statements, the Custody Rule and related instructions to the Form ADV mandate the filing of an other than annual amendment to the Form ADV once the audited financial statements are available. 

SEC Charges Venture Capital Adviser for Overcharging Fees. In September, the SEC charged a California-based ERA for overcharging management fees. The excess fees were a result of errors made by the manager, specifically with regard to (i) the failure to adjust its management fee calculations for securities subject to dispositions; (ii) calculations of the management fee based on aggregated invested capital at the portfolio company level instead of at the individual portfolio company level; (iii) including accrued but unpaid interest in its calculation of management fees; and (iv) calculating the funds’ post-investment period management fees on an incorrect date. As a result, the manager was ordered to return the excess management fees to fund investors and pay a penalty. This enforcement action underscores that while ERAs are subject to less regulatory oversight compared to RIAs, they are not exempt from SEC scrutiny. We recommend that all investment advisers routinely review their offering documents to ensure compliance with their fund offering terms.

SEC Pay-to-Play Rule. Rule 206(4)-5 of the Advisers Act bars investment advisers (except state registered investment advisers) from receiving compensation for advisory services provided to a government entity for two years after the adviser or its covered associates have made political contributions to that government entity or official. In September, the SEC investigated and settled four enforcement actions against investment advisers for violations of these pay-to-play rules as a result of political contributions of less than $1,000 by personnel of the investment advisers. The lack of allegations of an intent to exert influence highlights the strict liability enforcement mentality of the SEC with respect to pay-to-play rules as well as the importance of educating employees about political donations and implementing a robust internal compliance and reporting system.

CFTC Matters

Perpetual Futures and CFTC Regulation. Digital assets managers continue to inquire into the possibility of trading cryptocurrency futures contracts. With the CFTC recognizing certain digital assets as commodities, proper registration with the CFTC is required (or an appropriate exemption from registration must be utilized) if managers plan to trade cryptocurrency futures on registered exchanges. Under the Commodity Exchange Act, many, if not all, derivatives based on digital assets must be traded on a Designated Contract Market (“DCM”). However, many managers prefer not to trade on DCMs due to the lack of volume and liquidity and instead seek to trade on offshore exchanges that offer higher volume and reduced margin requirements. We caution U.S. managers who are trading on such exchanges – there may be risks to engaging with such counterparties in foreign jurisdictions and such U.S. managers often are unable to make the representations required in the account opening paperwork or terms of service (e.g., that the trading activity will not occur in the U.S.). To our knowledge, the CFTC has yet to take any formal action against managers trading on such offshore exchanges; however, we believe it is only a matter of time. Managers should carefully diligence any offshore exchanges they may use and disclose any applicable risks to investors.

CFTC & SEC Consider Asking Large Hedge Funds to Disclose Crypto Exposure. In September, the CFTC and the SEC submitted a joint proposal to amend Form PF—a confidential reporting form for certain investment advisers to private funds that are registered with the SEC and/or the CFTC. The proposal observes that investments in digital assets are continuing to grow, and ultimately suggests there is a parallel need to gather information on the exposure of crypto funds. The proposal suggests a new asset class be created for digital assets, which would be reported by firms or funds separately, revealing their exposure to the crypto industry. Both agencies solicited comments through October 11, 2022 and the comments submitted prior to the deadline are available to the public. This proposal is one of many actions underway by U.S. government agencies to better understand and regulate crypto as an asset class. To the extent this proposal is part of a larger regulatory scheme that provides clarity as to how and to what extent digital assets will be regulated, we think this has the potential to increase investments in the crypto industry.

Digital Asset Matters

Coinbase’s Bankruptcy Disclosure. The industry was caught off guard when Coinbase filed its latest 10-Q filing in which it stated “custodially held crypto assets may be considered to be the property of a bankruptcy estate.” In essence, in the event of Coinbase’s bankruptcy, its customers’ crypto assets may not be returned, and such clients could be treated as general unsecured creditors, meaning they would not have a claim to specific crypto assets held with Coinbase and could only recover the value of their crypto assets to the extent the bankruptcy estate has assets remaining after more senior claims are satisfied. While the Coinbase founder and CEO subsequently tweeted that Coinbase’s statement was a response to SEC disclosure requirements and that “customers have strong legal protections…in a black swan event like this,” the bankruptcy risks that Coinbase disclosed remain a possibility, however remote. In addition, other crypto exchanges, as well as third party wallet providers and custodians, may be subject to similar bankruptcy risks even though they may not have an obligation to disclose such risks publicly like Coinbase. In light of Coinbase’s disclosures, managers who do not exclusively rely on self-custody or cold wallets should review their custody practices, policies, and procedures, as well as agreements with their service providers, to ensure they have taken all available steps to safeguard investor assets. Managers should also consider making additional risk disclosures in their fund offering documents or other investor communications to educate their investors on these potential bankruptcy risks.

Liability Issues for Investing in a DAO. Due to the emerging nature of, and the scarce legislation surrounding, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (“DAOs”), operating, participating in, or investing in DAOs carries a heightened risk of liability as DAOs formed for the purpose of making a profit could be deemed general partnerships and therefore expose their participants to unlimited joint and several personal liability for the debts and obligations of such DAO. One recommendation to minimize exposure is to wrap the DAO in a liability blocker. As legislation related to, and use cases of, DAOs evolve and iterate, the need or effectiveness of liability blockers may change. Until then, managers should disclose this heightened risk to their investors and should consider only participating or investing in DAOs that are wrapped in a liability blocking entity such as a limited liability company.

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Crypto Regulatory Framework Bill. In June, Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) introduced bipartisan legislation to regulate the cryptocurrency market. The Responsible Financial Innovation Act aims to create a clear standard for determining whether certain digital assets are commodities or securities. The bill would give the CFTC authority over digital asset spot markets, allowing the agency to regulate digital assets in the same way as more traditional commodities. The bill has been referred to the Senate Finance Committee for examination and is pending approval of the Senate and the House of Representative.

OFAC/Tornado Cash. In August, the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) added Tornado Cash, a smart contract mixer that anonymizes Ethereum-based crypto exchanges, to the Specially Designated National (“SDN”) list for the alleged use of its services in laundering over $7 billion of digital assets. By taking this position, OFAC has essentially declared that anonymous exchanges are likely SDNs, effectively denying these exchanges access to the U.S. financial system by making it illegal for any U.S. person to transact using those exchanges – even if the U.S. person does not initiate or authorize the transaction via the SDN.  This is particularly concerning because users may lose real-world access to their cryptocurrency, likely without any recourse and even when they have not actively engaged with an SDN.

SEC Actions Against Sponsors of Unregistered Crypto Offerings. Since October, the SEC ramped up its investigation and enforcement of securities violations in the crypto asset space. Notably, the SEC brought an enforcement action against Kim Kardashian for promoting a crypto asset via social media without disclosing that she was being compensated by the entity offering the security. Several other groups were charged for allegedly raising millions of dollars for tokens and other crypto assets without adequate registration and from unsophisticated investors. The recent expansion of the SEC’s enforcement unit coupled with the wave of enforcement actions in the digital asset space indicates a shift in focus to digital assets.

Other Items

In-Kind Crypto Contributions / Redemptions. We are starting to see greater difficulty for managers of offshore funds to utilize in-kind crypto contributions and redemptions because of administrator and Anti Money Laundering (“AML”) officers’ unease. We expect this trend to generally continue until administrators and AML officers become more comfortable with verifying and authenticating in-kind crypto transactions, either with additional regulatory guidance or with innovative processes.

Investors with Connections to Russia. It may be simply anecdotal, but we are seeing more administrator inquiries regarding investors with ties to Russia who are flagged for potential sanctions issues. In these instances, we encourage clients to work with legal counsel and their administrator to analyze their specific facts and circumstances and determine an appropriate course of action.

NFTs. Although far removed from its headline status of 2021, the NFT ecosystem continues to evolve, and many groups are developing products for the sector that more closely mirror the traditional asset space. We anticipate continued growth in this area and the development of business, legal and regulatory norms.

New EU AML Regulator Will Oversee Crypto. In June, the European Union (the “EU”) proposed the establishment of a new Anti-Money Laundering Authority to strengthen the EU’s AML and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (“CTF”) framework. If enacted, this proposal would create a new regulatory body and standardize AML/CTF regulations across the EU and replace the current AML regime which varies across individual nations. The new AML/CTF Authority would have supervisory powers including over selected obliged entities of the financial sector such as crypto-asset service providers and would also be responsible for the monitoring, analysis, and exchange of information concerning money laundering and terrorist financing. With the increasing anonymity provided by cryptocurrency, including through mixers such as Tornado Cash discussed above, the EU’s standardization of a comprehensive AML/CTF regime provides legitimacy to this asset class.

BVI Business Companies Act of 2004. On January 1, 2023, several amendments to the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) Business Company Act of 2004 relating to voluntary liquidators of solvent BVI business companies will go into effect. Specifically, the amendment requires a voluntary liquidator to be a resident of the BVI (unless a joint voluntary liquidator is a BVI resident) that has at least 2 years of liquidation experience, is competent to perform the liquidation, and is familiar with relevant legislation. Further, voluntary liquidators will now be required to maintain the entity’s accounting records and to provide them to the entity’s registered agent

****

Compliance Calendar

As you plan your regulatory compliance timeline for the coming months, please keep the following dates in mind:

December 12, 2022

• Annual Renewal Payments Due for Preliminary Statement Issued in E-bill for Registration/Notice Filings. Payment can be made through FINRA Firm Gateway in the E-bill tab.

December 16, 2022

• Cayman Islands FATCA and CRS reporting deadlines.

December 22, 2022

• Last day to submit form filings via IARD prior to year-end. CRD/IARD will be unavailable to submit any filings from 11 PM ET, December 22, 2022 through January 2, 2023, due to year-end renewal processing.

December 31, 2022   

• Review RAUM to determine 2022 Form PF filing requirement.
• Registered CPOs must submit a pool quarterly report (CPO-PQR).
• Cayman funds regulated by CIMA that intend to de-register (i.e. wind down or continue as an exempted fund) should do so before this date to avoid 2022 CIMA fees.

January 10, 2023

• Form 13H Quarterly Filing for Changes. Filing is for calendar quarter that ended December 31, 2022 and should be submitted within 10 days of quarter end.

January 15, 2023

• Quarterly Form PF due for Large Liquidity Fund Advisers (if applicable).

January 31, 2023

• “Annex IV” AIFMD filing.

February 14, 2023

• Form 13F Quarterly Filing for Changes. Filing is for Calendar Quarter that ended December 31, 2022 and should generally be submitted within 45 days of quarter end.
• Form 13H Annual Filing for Calendar Year that ended December 31, 2022.
• Form 13G Annual Filing for Calendar Year that ended December 31, 2022.

March 1, 2023

• Quarterly Form PF due for larger hedge fund advisers (if applicable).
• Deadline for annual affirmation of NFA/CFTC exemptions. Exemptions must be affirmed within 60 days of Calendar Year end or exemptions will be withdrawn by the NFA.

March 31, 2023

• Form ADV Annual Update Amendment. Deadline to update and file Form ADV Parts 1, 2A, 2B (and Form CRS, if applicable).

March 31, 2023

• Cayman Islands CRS Compliance Form deadline.

Periodic

• Fund Managers should perform “Bad Actor” certifications annually.
• Form D and Blue Sky Filings should be current.
• CPO/CTA Annual Questionnaires must be submitted annually, and promptly upon material information changes, through NFA Annual Questionnaire system.

Consult our complete Compliance Calendar for all 2023 critical dates as you plan your regulatory compliance timeline for the year. 

Please contact us with any questions or assistance regarding compliance, registration, or planning issues on any of the above topics.

Sincerely,

Karl Cole-Frieman, Bart Mallon, David Rothschild, Scott Kitchens, Tony Wise, Alex Yastremski, & Garret Filler

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is an investment management law firm known for providing innovative and collaborative legal solutions to clients with complex financial needs in both the traditional and digital asset spaces. Headquartered in San Francisco, CFM services a wide variety of groups, from start-up investment managers to multi-billion-dollar firms. The firm provides a full suite of legal services including: formation of hedge funds, private equity funds, and venture capital funds; adviser compliance and registration; counterparty documentation; equity financings and token offerings; SEC, CFTC, NFA and FINRA matters; seed deals; hedge fund due diligence; employment and compensation matters; and, routine business matters. The Firm also publishes the prominent Hedge Fund Law Blog, which focuses on legal issues that impact the hedge fund community. For more information, please add us on LinkedIn and visit us at colefrieman.com.

July 21, 2022

Clients, Friends, Associates:

As we end the second quarter and enter the summer season, we would like to highlight some of the recent industry updates and occurrences we found to be interesting and impactful. While we try to keep these topics higher-level, please feel free to explore the links included and reach out to us if you have any related questions.

****

CFM Items

We are pleased to announce the addition of Alex Yastremski to our firm as Partner to lead our Digital Asset Practice. We’d also like to highlight the addition of Frank J. Martin as Counsel and the promotion of Tony Wise to Partner. Additionally, we have hired Joe Burgess as Executive Director to continue our focus on operational excellence. Please join us in welcoming them all to our firm!

Our annual CoinAlts Fund Symposium is returning to San Francisco and will be held on November 3, 2022. Please mark the date on your calendar and stay tuned for further registration information. Attendance will be complimentary for clients of our firm and those of the other CoinAlts founding firms, MG Stover, Cohen & Company, and Harneys.

****

SEC Matters

SEC Risk Alert on Material Non-Public Information Compliance Issues. The SEC recently released a risk alert summarizing the most common compliance deficiencies of both registered and unregistered investment advisers. Of note were (1) the lack of written policies to prevent the misuse of material non-public information (“MNPI”) and (2) the lack of compliance with the reporting requirements for “Access Persons” under the Code of Ethics Rule. All advisers should periodically revisit their written policies and procedures for the use of MNPI and registered investment advisers should review their Code of Ethics and establish reporting requirements for their Access Persons.

Enforcement Action for Misrepresenting Fees. The SEC instituted an enforcement action against a venture capital fund adviser and its CEO for misrepresenting their management fees as “industry standard 2 and 20” when they collected 10 years of management fees up front. This was misleading because it led investors to believe they would be charged an annual 2% management fee, rather than 20% of their total investment up front. The SEC also found that the adviser breached operating agreements by making inter-fund loans and cash transfers between funds. The adviser and its CEO agreed to a cease-and-desist order, returned funds, and paid penalties. In addition to confirming that the fund administrator reviews the offering documents and follows the mechanics for charging fees described therein, we recommend advisers closely review marketing materials with legal counsel or compliance consultants for any misleading or subjective statements.

OpenSea Insider Trading. A former high-ranking employee of OpenSea was recently indicted for wire fraud and money laundering in what the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York characterized as the “first-ever digital asset insider trading scheme.” The former head of Product at OpenSea was in charge of selecting NFTs to feature on the website’s homepage and allegedly misappropriated that confidential information by purchasing those NFTs before they were promoted on OpenSea’s homepage.

While the alleged actions in the indictment are reminiscent of traditional insider trading under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), since NFTs are not yet categorized as securities under the Exchange Act, the prosecutors here wove allegations of traditional fraud and insider trading concepts into charges for wire fraud and money laundering. The prosecutorial creativity signals that despite lagging legislation, law enforcement is taking notice of the increasing fraudulent activity in the NFT space and is ready to tackle such unsavory business practices and provide greater consumer protection. While insider trading remains an unsettled area of law in the digital asset space, concepts of fraud are well established, malleable, and largely immune from claims that certain digital assets are not “securities.”

Adviser Liable for Late Audit Distribution. The SEC charged a registered investment adviser with Custody Rule and compliance violations for failing to complete an audit within 120 days of the private fund’s fiscal year end. The SEC found that the adviser failed to have required audits performed and failed to deliver audited financial statements to investors in certain funds from 2014 onward, and in certain other funds from 2018 onward. The adviser consented to a cease-and-desist order, a censure, a monetary penalty, and to provide a notice of the Order to past and current investors in the fund. This enforcement action serves as a reminder to all advisers to remain vigilant and stay on top of their auditors to complete and distribute the annual fund audit in a timely fashion.

SEC Doubles Size of Crypto Enforcement Unit. The SEC announced the allocation of 20 additional positions to a Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit (formerly the Cyber Unit) to protect investors in crypto markets from cyber-related threats. The expanded Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit will focus on investigating securities law violations related to crypto asset offerings, crypto asset exchanges, crypto asset lending and staking, decentralized finance, NFTs, and stablecoins. We think this is a step in the right direction; it is clear the SEC recognizes that the digital asset space is growing and that greater resources need to be brought to bear on the industry. 

****

CFTC Items

Perpetual Futures and CFTC Regulation. Digital assets managers continue to inquire into the possibility of trading cryptocurrency futures contracts. With the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) recognizing certain digital assets as commodities, proper registration with the CFTC is required (or an appropriate exemption from registration must be utilized) if managers plan to trade cryptocurrency futures on registered exchanges. Under the Commodity Exchange Act, many, if not all, derivatives based on digital assets must be traded on a Designated Contract Market (“DCM”). However, many managers prefer not to trade on DCMs due to the lack of volume and liquidity and instead seek to trade on offshore exchanges that offer higher volume and reduced margin requirements. We caution U.S. managers who are trading on such exchanges – there may be risks to engaging with such counterparties in foreign jurisdictions and such U.S. managers often are unable to make the representations required in the account opening paperwork or terms of service (e.g., that the trading activity will not occur in the U.S.). To our knowledge, the CFTC has yet to take any action against managers trading on such offshore exchanges; however, we believe it is only a matter of time. Managers should carefully diligence any offshore exchanges they may use and disclose any applicable risks to investors.

****

Digital Asset Items

Coinbase’s Bankruptcy Disclosure. The industry was caught off guard when Coinbase filed its latest 10-Q filing in which it stated “custodially held crypto assets may be considered to be the property of a bankruptcy estate.” In essence, in the event of Coinbase’s bankruptcy, its customers’ crypto assets may not be returned, and such clients could be treated as general unsecured creditors, meaning they would not have a claim to specific crypto assets held with Coinbase and could only recover the value of their crypto assets to the extent the bankruptcy estate has assets remaining after more senior claims are satisfied. While the Coinbase founder and CEO subsequently tweeted that Coinbase’s statement was a response to SEC disclosure requirements and that “customers have strong legal protections…in a black swan event like this,” the bankruptcy risks that Coinbase disclosed remain a possibility, however remote. In addition, other crypto exchanges, as well as third party wallet providers and custodians, may be subject to similar bankruptcy risks even though they may not have an obligation to disclose such risks publicly like Coinbase. In light of Coinbase’s disclosures, managers who do not exclusively rely on self-custody or cold wallets should review their custody practices, policies, and procedures, as well as agreements with their service providers, to ensure they have taken all available steps to safeguard investor assets. Managers should also consider making additional risk disclosures in their fund offering documents or other investor communications to educate their investors on these potential bankruptcy risks.

Liability Issues for Investing in a DAO. Due to the emerging nature of, and the scarce legislation surrounding, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (“DAOs”), operating, participating in, or investing in DAOs carries a heightened risk of liability as DAOs formed for the purpose of making a profit could be deemed general partnerships and therefore expose their participants to unlimited joint and several personal liability for the debts and obligations of such DAO. One recommendation to minimize exposure is to wrap the DAO in a liability blocker. As legislation related to, and use cases of, DAOs evolve and iterate, the need or effectiveness of liability blockers may change. Until then, managers should disclose this heightened risk to their investors and should consider only participating or investing in DAOs that are wrapped in a liability blocking entity such as a limited liability company.

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Crypto Regulatory Framework Bill. Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) recently introduced bipartisan legislation to regulate the cryptocurrency market. The Responsible Financial Innovation Act aims to create a clear standard for determining whether certain digital assets are commodities or securities. The bill would give the CFTC authority over digital asset spot markets, allowing the agency to regulate digital assets in the same way as more traditional commodities. The bill has been referred to the Senate Finance Committee for examination and is pending approval of the Senate and the House of Representative.

****

Other Items

In-Kind Crypto Contributions / Redemptions. We are starting to see greater difficulty for managers of offshore funds to utilize in-kind crypto contributions and redemptions because of administrator and Anti Money Laundering (“AML”) officers’ unease. We expect this trend to generally continue until administrators and AML officers become more comfortable with verifying and authenticating in-kind crypto transactions, either with additional regulatory guidance or with innovative processes.

Investors with Connections to Russia. It may be simply anecdotal, but we are seeing more administrator inquiries regarding investors with ties to Russia who are flagged for potential sanctions issues. In these instances, we encourage clients to work with legal counsel and their administrator to analyze their specific facts and circumstances and determine an appropriate course of action.

NFTs. Although far removed from its headline status of 2021, the NFT ecosystem continues to evolve, and many groups are developing products for the sector that more closely mirror the traditional asset space. We anticipate continued growth in this area and the development of business, legal and regulatory norms.

****

Compliance Calendar

As you plan your regulatory compliance timeline for the coming months, please keep the following dates in mind:

July 10, 2022

• Form 13H Quarterly Filing for Changes. Filing is for calendar quarter that ended June 30, 2022 and should be submitted within 10 days of quarter end.

July 15, 2022

• Form PF for Large Liquidity Fund Advisers. Filing is for calendar quarter that ended June 30, 2022.

July 31, 2022

• ERISA Schedule C of DOL Form 5500 Disclosure.

August 15, 2022

• Form 13F Quarterly Filing. Filing is for calendar quarter that ended June 30, 2022 and should be submitted within 45 days of quarter end.
• CTA Form PR. Filing is for calendar quarter that ended June 30, 2022 and should be submitted within 45 days of quarter end.

August 29, 2022

• Form PF for Large Hedge Fund Advisers. Filing is for calendar quarter that ended June 30, 2022.
• CPO-PQR Form. Filing is for calendar quarter that ended June 30, 2022 and should be submitted within 60 days of quarter end.

August 31, 2022

• Deadline to submit Annual FINRA Entitlement Certification for 2022. If not completed, FINRA accounts will be withdrawn.

Consult our complete Compliance Calendar for all 2022 critical dates as you plan your regulatory compliance timeline for the year. 

Please contact us with any questions or assistance regarding compliance, registration, or planning issues on any of the above topics.

Sincerely,

Karl Cole-Frieman, Bart Mallon, David Rothschild, Scott Kitchens, Alex Yastremski, & Tony Wise

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is an investment management law firm known for providing innovative and collaborative legal solutions to clients with complex financial needs in both the traditional and digital asset spaces. Headquartered in San Francisco, CFM services a wide variety of groups, from start-up investment managers to multi-billion-dollar firms. The firm provides a full suite of legal services including: formation of hedge funds, private equity funds, and venture capital funds; adviser compliance and registration; counterparty documentation; equity financings and token offerings; SEC, CFTC, NFA and FINRA matters; seed deals; hedge fund due diligence; employment and compensation matters; and, routine business matters. The Firm also publishes the prominent Hedge Fund Law Blog, which focuses on legal issues that impact the hedge fund community. For more information, please add us on LinkedIn and visit us at colefrieman.com.

San Francisco, Calif. – July 14, 2022: Investment management law firm Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP (“CFM”) is pleased to announce that Counsel Tony Wise has been promoted to Partner. Mr. Wise joined CFM in 2016 and advises asset managers in fund formation and regulatory matters. Mr. Wise specializes in funds that invest in cryptocurrency and the broader ecosystem, and more recently has focused on digital asset counterparty documentation. Mr. Wise helped Partner Scott Kitchens open CFM’s Denver office in 2019.

“We are proud to advance Tony to the role of Partner. He has undoubtedly earned it,” said Bart Mallon, Co-Managing Partner. “Tony has gained an exceptional standing within the investment industry due to his forward-thinking ability, our clients’ results, and his commitment to helping them achieve their financial business goals.”

“Since joining our firm, Tony has worked diligently on behalf of our clients’ investment interests within the digital asset space. His commitment to the success of our firm is a true value to our team and our clients,” said Co-Managing Partner Karl Cole-Frieman.

Mr. Wise added, “I truly enjoy providing guidance to our asset manager clients and am excited to continue expanding the firm’s digital asset-related legal services.”

About: Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is an investment management law firm known for providing innovative and collaborative legal solutions to clients with complex financial needs in both the traditional and digital asset spaces. Headquartered in San Francisco, CFM services a wide variety of groups, from start-up investment managers to multi-billion-dollar firms. The firm provides a full suite of legal services including: formation of hedge funds, private equity funds, and venture capital funds; adviser compliance and registration; counterparty documentation; equity financings and token offerings; SEC, CFTC, NFA and FINRA matters; seed deals; hedge fund due diligence; employment and compensation matters; and, routine business matters. The Firm also publishes the prominent Hedge Fund Law Blog, which focuses on legal issues that impact the hedge fund community. For more information, please add us on LinkedIn and visit us at colefrieman.com.

Press Release

San Francisco, June 1, 2022: Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP (“CFM”), a boutique investment management law firm focusing on the digital asset space, has hired Alex Yastremski as a Partner to lead its Digital Asset Practice. Mr. Yastremski is a digital asset industry veteran with significant experience helping large and small companies with their go-to-market strategies. His practice is focused on start-ups through emerging growth companies, venture capital financings, equity issuances (including Web3 platforms and token launches), and other regulatory matters related to blockchain-related businesses. Prior to joining CFM, Alex served as Co-Chair of the Blockchain and Digital Currency Task Force of a large law firm and was General Counsel of DASAN Zhone Solutions and BitFury Group Ltd.

“We are obviously excited to expand the core CFM investment management practice with the addition of specific digital asset equity and financing practice,” said CFM Co-Founder and Co-Managing Partner Bart Mallon. “Alex has strong and varied experience with private companies, financial sponsors, investors, and entrepreneurs dealing with novel legal issues. His skill set is a perfect match for the needs of many CFM clients.”

Alex’s arrival comes at a time of notable growth for CFM. The CFM team includes over 35 professionals, serving over 1,500 clients and launching over 250 private funds per year, predominately in the digital asset space. The addition of Mr. Yastremski also highlights the expansion of the firm’s corporate and finance capabilities and showcases the growth of the firm.

Karl Cole-Frieman, also a CFM Co-Founder and Co-Managing Partner, added, “We could not be more delighted to have Alex join our many talented professionals. Our pioneering and best-in-class work with non-traditional asset classes, notably our work with cryptocurrency fund managers, continues to be our firm’s core strength.”

About: Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is an investment management law firm known for providing innovative and collaborative legal solutions to clients with complex financial needs in both the traditional and digital asset spaces. Headquartered in San Francisco, CFM services a wide variety of groups, from start-up investment managers to multi-billion-dollar firms. The firm provides a full suite of legal services including: formation of hedge funds, private equity funds, and venture capital funds; adviser compliance and registration; counterparty documentation; equity financings and token offerings; SEC, CFTC, NFA and FINRA matters; seed deals; hedge fund due diligence; employment and compensation matters; and, routine business matters. The firm also publishes the prominent Hedge Fund Law Blog, focusing on legal issues that impact the hedge fund community. For more information, please add us on LinkedIn and visit us at colefrieman.com.

Press Release

We are thrilled to announce that we are sponsoring the Bitcoin 2022 conference in Miami next week. The team from CFM will be attending the conference and many of the ancillary events and look forward to meeting with clients, friends, service providers, and some of the most critical minds in the digital asset space. 

Karl Cole-Frieman, Bart Mallon, Dave Rothschild, Tony Wise, Malhar Oza, and Dominic Althoff will all be there. 

We welcome you to engage with our team of industry-leading lawyers, so please get in touch with us if you want to catch up or schedule a meeting next week in Miami: https://resources.colefrieman.com/bitcoin2022

We wanted to take this opportunity to thank everyone who attended and participated in our 2022 compliance update hosted by Justin Schleifer, Co-Founder, President (Aspect Advisors), and Bart Mallon, Co-Managing Partner (Cole-Frieman & Mallon). Our discussion on March 3 touched on many essential topics for financial industry professionals to keep top of mind for the upcoming year. 

Some high points included:

Compliance Calendar.

• Imminent Deadlines & Filings
  • ADV and CRS – March 31
  • Form PF – April 30 (annual filers)
• Rule Implementation Dates
  • SEC Advertising Rule – November 2022
  • Proposed Private Fund Disclosures – Q2 2023
  • Proposed Cybersecurity Rules – Q2 2023
• Periodic Tasks
  • Annual review of policies and procedures
  • Business continuity test/review
  • Cybersecurity test
  • Customer/account reviews
  • Employee training
  • Code of ethics surveillance

SEC Marketing Rule Implementation. The new SEC Marketing rules will replace the existing regime of no-action letters and establish clear rules for fund managers. These rules will not fundamentally change the spirit of the current regime and instead clarify specifics on today’s issues such as social media use, blog posts, testimonials, and others. The new rules are not expected to impact the investment management industry significantly. Still, fund managers will need to update policies and procedures and review current advertising materials to ensure compliance with the new rules.

Proposed Private Fund Disclosure Rules. The SEC has proposed new rules for private fund disclosures that seek to improve transparency for types of information that investors receive to aid them in making informed decisions. As it stands, the proposals could profoundly impact private fund operations and the relationship between managers and investors regarding investments. The effects would be felt by large fund managers who receive institutional investments. The institutional investor has the leverage to ask managers for preferential rights and other forms of favorable treatment. The SEC is reviewing proposals, and experts believe that some version of the rules will likely be implemented in 2023.

Proposed Cybersecurity Rules. In recent years, there has been a push from the SEC and other financial regulators to improve cybersecurity, so it comes as no surprise that the SEC has formally proposed a set of rules to govern the matter. Like other policy and procedure requirements, many of the new rules lack specifics, meaning that individual firms will need to determine what they view as necessary to include to maintain compliance.

NFTs. From the past six months, everyone’s favorite buzzword has grown in prominence within the investment management industry following the launch of NFT-exclusive private investment funds. Like other digital assets, the primary concerns for managers are custody and the general compliance of the assets. NFTs have also raised novel valuation questions as experts seek ways to appraise the assets in ways beyond their trading price.

DAOs. The emergence of DAOs as legal entities has raised two critical items to follow in 2022. First, DAOs have sought to create real-world investment products, raising questions about how private fund managers can allow a DAO to invest in the fund. Second, DOAs have inquired about launching their private investment fund products, which presents unique legal and compliance challenges that need to be tackled.

Offshore Exchanges. A popular question from fund managers in the digital asset space regards opening accounts at offshore exchanges legally. To date, there is no easy answer, and attempts to do so must be conducted carefully on a client-by-client basis. There will be instances where opening an offshore exchange account is impossible or cost-prohibitive.

BlockFi’s Settlement. The SEC succeeded in sending shockwaves through the digital asset space after it agreed to a $100 million settlement with BlockFi over BlockFi’s interest product. BlockFi has decided to work with the SEC to register the product. Still, experts are unsure of how this will be done and wonder if this settlement will affect the desire of other market participants to develop new products. Furthermore, this settlement reflects the SEC’s troubling pattern of regulating by enforcement instead of publishing new rules and guidance. It also shines a light on how the SEC views these products as securities and could be the first step in considering specific lending-focused smart contracts to be securities.

Crypto Best Practices. There are essential best practices that fund managers in the digital asset space need to be aware of, especially managers experienced in traditional asset classes:

1. It is essential to conduct and document diligence on counterparties and vendors. Vendors in the digital asset space are often new and unproven, in contrast to the established vendors of traditional asset classes.
2. Fund managers must have a reasonable basis for custody providers and custody solutions. Nonetheless, while the SEC views custody of digital assets as being out of the ordinary, they have primarily been receptive to new solutions.
3. Be aware of the potential to receive MNPI.

Unlike traditional asset classes, there are fewer mechanisms for publishing company information to make it public. It is essential that employees understand the meaning of MNPI and how it impacts their business.

Big Predictions for 2022. Justin predicts that the SEC will bring another significant enforcement action that matches the BlockFi action in scale. The agency wants to further apply traditional securities law to digital assets, which means we could see another large settlement or a case fought in public court to set a precedence within the industry. Bart predicts increased activity from DAOs and potentially a significant breakthrough with DAOs in the next six months.

Regards,

Bart Mallon & Justin Schleifer

Aspect Advisors LLC

Aspect Advisors LLC is modern regulatory consultant providing customized compliance solutions to entrepreneurs. The firm has a focus on fintech companies, broker-dealers, and investment managers (hedge fund, VC, PE, RIA, etc).  We provide compliance and back-office solutions engineered to decrease worry and save time and resources. Among other items, the firm helps clients with regulatory registration, drafting compliance policies and procedures, conducting annual reviews, and other bespoke items.

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is one of the top investment management law firms in the United States, known for providing top-tier, innovative, and collaborative legal solutions for complex financial services matters. Headquartered in San Francisco, Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP services both start-up investment managers, as well as multi-billion-dollar firms. The firm provides a full suite of legal services to the investment management community, including hedge fund, private equity fund, venture capital fund, mutual fund formation, adviser registration, counterparty documentation, SEC, CFTC, NFA and FINRA matters, seed deals, hedge fund due diligence, employment and compensation matters, and routine business matters. The firm also publishes the prominent Hedge Fund Law Blog, which focuses on legal issues that impact the hedge fund community. For more information, please add us on LinkedIn and visit us at colefrieman.com.

Clients, Friends, Associates:

As we near the end of 2021, we have developed a checklist to help managers effectively oversee the business and regulatory landscape for the coming year. We have also highlighted some recent industry updates that we believe may impact our clients. While we strive to present an informative, albeit brief, overview of these topics, we are also available should you have any related questions.

This update includes the following:

• Annual Compliance & Other Items
• Annual Fund Matters
• Annual Management Company Matters
• Regulatory & Other Items from 2021
• 2022 Compliance Calendar

****

Annual Compliance & Other Items

Annual Privacy Policy Notice. On an annual basis, Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) registered investment advisers (“SEC RIAs”) are required to provide natural person clients with a copy of the firm’s privacy policy if: (i) the SEC RIA has disclosed nonpublic personal information other than in connection with servicing consumer accounts or administering financial products; or (ii) the firm’s privacy policy has changed. The SEC has provided a model form and accompanying instructions for firm privacy policies.

Annual Compliance Review. The Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) of a registered investment advisor (“RIA”) must conduct a review of the adviser’s compliance policies and procedures annually. This annual compliance review should be in writing and presented to senior management. CCOs should consider additions, revisions, and updates to the compliance program as may be necessary. We recommend firms discuss the annual review with their outside counsel or compliance firm to obtain guidance about the review process and a template for the assessment. Conversations regarding the annual review may raise sensitive matters, and advisers should ensure that these discussions are protected by attorney-client privilege. Advisers that are not registered may still wish to review their procedures and/or implement a compliance program as a best practice.

Form ADV Annual Amendment. RIAs or managers filing as exempt reporting advisers (“ERAs”) with the SEC or a state securities authority must file an annual amendment to their Form ADV within 90 days of the end of their fiscal year. For most managers, the Form ADV amendment will be due on March 31, 2022. RIAs must provide a copy of the updated Form ADV Part 2A brochure and Part 2B brochure supplement (or a summary of changes with an offer to provide the complete brochure) to each “client” and, if applicable, Part 3 (Form CRS: Client Relationship Summary) to each “retail investor” with which the RIA has entered into an investment advisory contract. Note that for SEC-registered advisers to private investment vehicles, a “client” for purposes of this rule refers to the vehicle(s) managed by the adviser and not the underlying investors. State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client.” For purposes of the Form ADV Part 3, a “retail investor” means a natural person, or the legal representative of such natural person, who seeks to receive or receives services primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.

Switching to/from SEC Regulation.

SEC Registration. Managers who no longer qualify for SEC registration as of the time of filing the annual Form ADV amendment must withdraw from SEC registration within 180 days after the end of their fiscal year (June 30, 2022, for most managers), by filing a Form ADV-W. Such managers should consult with legal counsel to determine whether they are required to register in the states in which they conduct business. Managers who are required to register with the SEC as of the date of their annual amendment must register with the SEC within 90 days of filing the annual amendment (June 30, 2022, for most managers, assuming the annual amendment is filed on March 31, 2022).

Exempt Reporting Advisers. Managers who no longer meet the definition of an ERA will need to submit a final report as an ERA and apply for registration with the SEC or the relevant state securities authority, as applicable, generally within 90 days after the filing of the annual amendment (June 30, 2022, for most managers, assuming the annual amendment is filed on March 31, 2022).

Custody Rule Annual Audit.

SEC RIAs. SEC RIAs must comply with specific custody procedures, including: (i) maintaining client funds and securities with a qualified custodian; (ii) having a reasonable basis to believe that the qualified custodian sends an account statement to each advisory client at least quarterly; and (iii) undergoing an annual surprise examination conducted by an independent public accountant.

SEC RIAs to pooled investment vehicles may avoid both the quarterly statement and surprise examination requirements by having audited financial statements prepared for each pooled investment vehicle in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) by an independent public accountant registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). Audited financial statements must be sent to investors in the fund within 120 days after the fund’s fiscal year-end (or for fund-of-fund clients, within 180 days after fiscal year-end). SEC RIAs should review their internal procedures to ensure compliance with the custody rules.

California RIAs. California-registered investment advisers (“CA RIAs”) that manage pooled investment vehicles and are deemed to have custody of client assets are also subject to independent party surprise examinations. However, CA RIAs can avoid these additional requirements by engaging a PCAOB-registered auditor to prepare and distribute audited financial statements to all beneficial owners of the pooled investment vehicle, and the Commissioner of the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (“DFPI”). Those CA RIAs that do not engage an auditor must, among other things: (i) provide notice of such custody on the Form ADV; (ii) maintain client assets with a qualified custodian; (iii) engage an independent party to act in the best interest of investors to review fees, expenses, and withdrawals; and (iv) retain an independent certified public accountant to conduct surprise examinations of assets.

Other State RIAs. Advisers registered in other states should consult their legal counsel about those states’ specific custody requirements.

California Minimum Net Worth Requirement and Financial Reports.

CA RIAs with Discretion. Every CA RIA (other than those also registered as broker-dealers) that has discretionary authority over client funds or securities, regardless of if they have custody, must maintain a net worth of at least $10,000 (CA RIAs with custody are subject to heightened minimum net worth requirements, discussed further below).

CA RIAs with Custody. Generally, every CA RIA (other than those also registered as broker-dealers) that has custody of client funds or securities must maintain a minimum net worth of $35,000. However, a CA RIA that: (i) is deemed to have custody solely because it acts as the general partner of a limited partnership, or a comparable position for another type of pooled investment vehicle; and (ii) otherwise complies with the California custody rule described above is exempt from the $35,000 minimum (and instead is required to maintain the $10,000 minimum).

Financial Reports. Every CA RIA subject to the above minimum net worth requirements must file certain reports with the DFPI. In addition to annual reports, CA RIAs may be required to file interim reports or reports of financial condition if they fall below certain net worth thresholds.

Annual Re-Certification of CFTC Exemptions. Commodity pool operators (“CPOs”) and commodity trading advisers (“CTAs”) currently relying on certain exemptions from registration with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) are required to re-certify their eligibility within 60 days of the calendar year-end. A common example includes the 4.13(a)(3) exemption also known as the “de minimis” exemption. CPOs and CTAs currently relying on relevant exemptions should consult with legal counsel to evaluate whether they remain eligible to rely on such exemptions.

CPO and CTA Annual Updates. Registered CPOs and CTAs must prepare and file Annual Questionnaires and Annual Registration Updates with the National Futures Association (“NFA”), as well as submit payment for annual maintenance fees and NFA membership dues. Registered CPOs must also prepare and file their fourth-quarter report for each commodity pool on Form CPO-PQR, while CTAs must file their fourth-quarter report on Form CTA-PR. Unless eligible to claim relief under Regulation 4.7, registered CPOs and CTAs must update their disclosure documents periodically, as they may not use any document dated more than 12 months prior to the date of its intended use. Disclosure documents that are materially inaccurate or incomplete must be promptly corrected, and redistributed to pool participants.

Trade Errors. Managers should ensure that all trade errors are properly addressed pursuant to the manager’s trade errors policies by the end of the year. Documentation of trade errors should be finalized, and if the manager is required to reimburse any of its funds or other clients, it should do so by year-end.

Soft Dollars. Managers that participate in soft dollar programs should make sure that they have addressed any commission balances from the previous year.

Schedule 13G/D and Section 16 Filings. Managers who exercise investment discretion over accounts (including funds and separately managed accounts) that are beneficial owners of 5% or more of a registered voting equity security must report these positions on Schedule 13D or 13G. Passive investors are generally eligible to file the short-form Schedule 13G, which is updated annually within 45 days of the end of the year. Schedule 13D is required when a manager is ineligible to file Schedule 13G and is due 10 days after acquiring more than 5% beneficial ownership of a registered voting equity security. For managers who are also making Section 16 filings, this is an opportune time to review your filings to confirm compliance and anticipate needs for the first quarter.

Section 16 filings are required for “corporate insiders” (including beneficial owners of 10% or more of a registered voting equity security). An initial Form 3 is due within 10 days after becoming an “insider”; Form 4 reports ownership changes and is due by the end of the second business day after an ownership change; and Form 5 reports any transactions that should have been reported earlier on a Form 4 or were eligible for deferred reporting and is due within 45 days after the end of each fiscal year.

Form 13F. A manager must file a Form 13F if it exercises investment discretion with respect to $100 million or more in certain “Section 13F securities” within 45 days after the end of the year in which the manager reaches the $100 million filing threshold. The SEC lists the securities subject to 13F reporting on its website.

Form 13H. Managers who meet one of the SEC’s large trader thresholds (generally, managers whose transactions in exchange-listed securities equal or exceed two million shares or $20 million during any calendar day, or 20 million shares or $200 million during any calendar month) are required to file an initial Form 13H with the SEC within 10 days of crossing a threshold. Large traders also need to amend Form 13H annually within 45 days of the end of the year. In addition, changes to the information on Form 13H will require interim amendments following the calendar quarter in which the change occurred.

Form PF. Managers to private funds that are either registered with the SEC or required to be registered with the SEC and who have at least $150 million in regulatory assets under management (“RAUM”) must file a Form PF. Private advisers with less than $1.5 billion in RAUM must file Form PF annually within 120 days of their fiscal year-end. Private advisers with $1.5 billion or more in RAUM must file Form PF within 60 days of the end of each fiscal quarter.

Form MA. Investment advisers that provide advice on municipal financial products are considered “municipal advisors” by the SEC and must file a Form MA annually, within 90 days of their fiscal year-end.

SEC Form D. Form D filings for most funds need to be amended annually, on or before the anniversary of the most recently filed Form D. Copies of Form D are publicly available on the SEC’s EDGAR website.

Blue Sky Filings. On an annual basis, a manager should review its blue sky filings for each state to make sure it has met any initial and renewal filing requirements. Several states impose late fees or reject late filings altogether. Accordingly, it is critical to stay on top of filing deadlines for both new investors and renewals. We also recommend that managers review blue sky filing submission requirements. Many states now permit blue sky filings to be filed electronically through the Electronic Filing Depository (“EFD”) system, and certain states will now only accept filings through EFD.

IARD Annual Fees. Preliminary annual renewal fees for state-registered and SEC-registered investment advisers are due on December 13, 2021. Failure to submit electronic payments by the deadline may result in registrations terminating due to a “failure to renew.” If you have not already done so, you should submit full payment into your Renewal Account by E-Bill, check, or wire as soon as possible.

Pay-to-Play and Lobbyist Rules. SEC rules disqualify investment advisers, their key personnel, and placement agents acting on their behalf from seeking to be engaged by a governmental client if they have made certain political contributions. State and local governments have similar rules, including California, which requires internal sales professionals who meet the definition of “placement agents” (people who act for compensation as finders, solicitors, marketers, consultants, brokers, or other intermediaries in connection with offering or selling investment advisory services to a state public retirement system in California) to register with the state as lobbyists and comply with California lobbyist reporting and regulatory requirements. Note that managers offering or selling investment advisory services to local government entities must register as lobbyists in the applicable cities and counties. State laws on lobbyist registration differ significantly, so managers should carefully review reporting requirements in the states in which they operate to make sure they comply with the relevant rules.

****

Annual Fund Matters

New Issue Status. On an annual basis, managers need to confirm or reconfirm the eligibility of investors that participate in initial public offerings, or new issues, pursuant to both Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) Rules 5130 and 5131. Most managers reconfirm investor eligibility via negative consent (i.e., investors are informed of their status on file with the manager and are asked to notify the manager of any changes), whereby a failure to respond by any investor operates as consent to its current status.

ERISA Status. Given the significant problems that can occur from not properly tracking ERISA investors in private funds, we recommend that managers confirm or reconfirm on an annual basis the ERISA status of their investors. This is particularly important for managers that track the underlying percentage of ERISA funds for each investor, with respect to each class of interests in a pooled investment vehicle.

Wash Sales. Managers should carefully manage wash sales for year-end. Failure to do so could result in book/tax differences for investors. Certain dealers can provide managers with swap strategies to manage wash sales, including Basket Total Return Swaps and Split Strike Forward Conversion. These strategies should be considered carefully to make sure they are consistent with the investment objectives of the fund.

Redemption Management. Managers with significant redemptions at the end of the year should carefully manage unwinding positions to minimize transaction costs in the current year (that could impact performance) and prevent transaction costs from impacting remaining investors in the next year. When closing funds or managed accounts, managers should pay careful attention to the liquidation procedures in the fund constituent documents and the managed account agreement.

NAV Triggers and Waivers. Managers should promptly seek waivers of any applicable termination events specified in a fund’s International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) or other counterparty agreement that may be triggered by redemptions, performance, or a combination of both at the end of the year (NAV declines are common counterparty agreement termination events).

Fund Expenses. Managers should wrap up all fund expenses for 2021 if they have not already done so. In particular, managers should contact their outside legal counsel to obtain accurate and up to date information about legal expenses for inclusion in the NAV for year-end performance.

Electronic Schedule K-1s. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) authorizes partnerships and limited liability companies taxed as partnerships to issue Schedule K-1s to investors solely by electronic means, provided the partnership has received the investors’ affirmative consent. States may have different rules regarding electronic K-1s, and partnerships should check with their counsel whether they may be required to send hard copy state K-1s. Partnerships must also provide each investor with specific disclosures that include a description of the hardware and software necessary to access the electronic K-1s, how long the consent is effective, and the procedures for withdrawing the consent. If you would like to send K-1s to your investors electronically, you should discuss your options with your service providers.

“Bad Actor” Recertification Requirement. A security offering cannot rely on the Rule 506 safe harbor from SEC registration if the issuer or its “covered persons” are “bad actors.” Fund managers must determine whether they are subject to the bad actor disqualification any time they are offering or selling securities in reliance on Rule 506. The SEC has advised that an issuer may reasonably rely on a covered person’s agreement to provide notice of a potential or actual bad actor triggering event pursuant to contractual covenants, bylaw requirements, or undertakings in a questionnaire or certification. However, if an offering is continuous, delayed or long-lived, issuers must periodically update their factual inquiry through a bring-down of representations, questionnaires, and certifications, negative consent letters, reexamination of public databases or other means, depending on the circumstances. Fund managers should consult with counsel to determine how frequently such an update is required. As a matter of practice, most fund managers should perform these updates at least annually.

U.S. FATCA. Funds should monitor their compliance with the U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”). Generally, U.S. FATCA reports are due to the IRS on March 31, 2022, or September 30, 2022, depending on where the fund is domiciled. However, reports may be required by an earlier date for jurisdictions that are parties to intergovernmental agreements (“IGAs”) with the U.S. Additionally, the U.S. may require that reports be submitted through the appropriate local tax authority in the applicable IGA jurisdiction, rather than the IRS. Given the varying U.S. FATCA requirements applicable to different jurisdictions, managers should review and confirm the specific U.S. FATCA reporting requirements that may apply. As a reminder, we strongly encourage managers to file the required reports and notifications, even if they already missed previous deadlines. Applicable jurisdictions may be increasing enforcement and monitoring of FATCA reporting and imposing penalties for each day late.

CRS. Funds should also monitor their compliance with the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Common Reporting Standard (“CRS”). All “Financial Institutions” in the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) and the Cayman Islands must register with the respective jurisdiction’s Tax Information Authority and submit various reports with the applicable regulator via the associated online portal. Managers to funds domiciled in other jurisdictions should also confirm whether any CRS reporting will be required in such jurisdictions and the procedures required to enroll and file annual reports. We recommend managers contact their tax advisors to stay on top of the U.S. FATCA and CRS requirements and avoid potential penalties.

****

Annual Management Company Matters

Management Company Expenses. Managers who distribute profits annually should attempt to address management company expenses in the year they are incurred. If ownership or profit percentages are adjusted at the end of the year, a failure to manage expenses could significantly impact the economics of the partnership or the management company.

Employee Reviews. An effective annual review process is vital to reduce the risk of employment-related litigation and protect the management company in the event of such litigation. Moreover, it is an opportunity to provide context for bonuses, compensation adjustments, employee goals, and other employee-facing matters at the firm. It is never too late to put an annual review process in place.

Compensation Planning. In the fund industry, and the financial services industry in general, the end of the year is the appropriate time to make adjustments to compensation programs. Because much of a manager’s revenue is tied to annual income from incentive fees, any changes to the management company structure, affiliated partnerships, or any shadow equity programs should be effective on the first of the year. Partnership agreements and operating agreements should be appropriately updated to reflect any such changes.

Insurance. If a manager carries director and officer or other liability insurance, the policy should be reviewed annually to ensure that the manager has provided notice to the carrier of all claims and all potential claims. Newly launched funds should also be added to the policy as necessary.

Other Tax Considerations. Fund managers should assess their overall tax position and consider several steps to optimize tax liability. Managers should also be aware of self-employment taxes, which can potentially be minimized by structuring the investment manager as a limited partnership. Several steps are available to optimize tax liability, including: (i) changing the incentive fee to an incentive allocation; (ii) use of stock-settled stock appreciation rights; (iii) if appropriate, terminating swaps and realizing net losses; (iv) making a Section 481(a) election under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”); (v) making a Section 475 election under the Code; and (vi) making charitable contributions. Managers should consult legal and tax professionals to evaluate whether any of these options are appropriate.

****

Regulatory & Other Items from 2021

SEC Updates.

SEC Issues Risk Alert on Investment Advisers’ Fee Calculations. The SEC’s Division of Examinations has recently completed a review of 130 SEC-RIAs and published its findings in this November 2021 Risk Alert. The review focused on three key areas: (i) the accuracy of fees charged by investment advisers; (ii) the accuracy and adequacy of investment adviser disclosures; and (iii) the effectiveness of investment advisers’ compliance programs and the accuracy of their books and records. The risk alert notes key mistakes such as the failure to maintain written billing policies and inaccurate financial statements caused by errors in accounting procedures. Though mistakes such as these are not new to the industry, this report provides a reminder to investment advisers to consistently review and improve their policies and disclosures pertaining to client fees.

SEC Proposes Revisions to Electronic Recordkeeping Requirements. The SEC has published proposed amendments to electronic recordkeeping rules applicable to broker-dealers, as well as security-based swap dealers (“SBSDs”) and major security-based swap participants (“MSBSPs”) that are not also registered as broker-dealers (collectively, “SBS Entities”). Currently, broker-dealers, are required to maintain electronic records in a “non-rewritable, non-erasable format” while SBS Entities are not subject this requirement. However, the new proposal provides for an audit trail alternative whereby records may be preserved “in a manner that permits the recreation of an original record if it is lost, over-written or erased.” Under the new rule, SBS Entities without a prudential regulator would also be required to utilize one of the two authorized recordkeeping methods. The proposed amendment, if enacted, would apply only to newly created records and not to records created prior to the amendment. Applicable entities should keep an eye out for the final rule to ensure their electronic recordkeeping policies and procedures are appropriately updated.

SEC Proposes Substantial Reporting and Disclosure of Securities Lending Information. The SEC has published and requested comment on proposed Rule 10c-1 under the Exchange Act. The proposed rule would require all lenders of securities to provide certain information and material terms related to securities lending transactions. The proposal covers loans of any “security” as defined in Section 3(a)(10) of the Exchange Act, applying to both equity and debt securities. The reporting requirements would also apply to “lending agents,” in situations where securities are lent through an intermediary, and any broker dealers acting as “reporting agents” . Certain of the information provided, including, but not limited to, the legal name and legal entity identifier of the issuer, the securities’ ticker symbol, and the date and time the loan was effected, would be made public. Questions remain regarding the scope of the information to be collected, as well as how lending of certain digital assets that are classified as “securities” may be impacted by this proposal. There are various activities that involve the lending of digital assets, such as yield farming, which could be subject to the proposed rule. The SEC has not yet commented on the effect of Rule 10c-1 on digital asset lending, but we will continue to monitor this matter for any updates or related guidance.

New Qualified Client Standard in Effect. As a reminder, the SEC revised dollar thresholds for Qualified Clients went into effect August 16, 2021. The “net worth” threshold increased from $2,100,000 to $2,200,000 and the dollar amount for the “assets-under-management” test was raised from $1,000,000 to $1,100,000. Please refer to our previous update for more information.

SEC Adopts Marketing Rule. As a reminder, the SEC adopted new marketing rules for investment advisers that will drastically overhaul and replace the prior cash solicitation and advertising rules applicable to investment advisers, their marketing materials, and their advertising practices to replace. The compliance period for these new marketing rules begins on November 4, 2022. Please refer to our previous update for more information.

Digital Asset Updates.

The President’s Working Group on Financial Markets Issues Risk Assessment on Stablecoins. An interagency report released on November 1, 2021 outlines the risks that stablecoins pose to the safety and efficiency of the financial market, as well as recommendations for congressional and agency action intended to address such risks. The primary concerns raised are: (i) the loss of value; (ii) payment system risks; and (iii) systemic risks, such as rapid scaling or failures by key participants. The recommendations include requiring stablecoin issuers to be insured as depository institutions, implementation of federal oversight regimes for digital wallet providers, limiting stablecoin issuers’ and digital wallet providers’ ability to affiliate with commercial entities, and limiting their use of users’ transaction data. The report further recommends that federal agencies, including the SEC, CFTC, and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”), use their oversight power where appropriate and that the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”) designate certain stablecoin arrangement activities as, or as likely to become, systemically important payment, clearing, and settlement (“PCS”) activities, enabling agencies to establish appropriate risk-management standards for institutions engaging in PCS activities.

The Treasury Issues Reports Addressing Threats Linked to Virtual Currency Transactions and Ransomware Payments. The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s (“Treasury”) Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) issued guidance on October 15, 2021 regarding the application of sanctions laws to virtual currency activity and best practices for compliance with such sanctions regulations. OFAC also issued an updated advisory report discouraging private companies and individuals from making ransomware or extortion payments and highlighting risks to companies that facilitate such payments on behalf of the victim, such as the risk of directly or indirectly engaging in a prohibited transaction with individuals or entities on OFAC’s Specifically Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List. OFAC recommends companies implement sanctions compliance programs to mitigate exposure to related violations, and notes that such programs are taken into consideration in the event of a violation.

South Korea to Introduce 20% Tax on Crypto Trading Profits. As a reminder, South Korea will implement a 20% capital gains tax on Bitcoin (BTC) and cryptocurrency profits starting January 1, 2022.

Offshore Updates.

BVI’s New Data Privacy Law in Effect. A new BVI statute, the Data Protection Act, 2021 (“DPA”) went into effect on July 9, 2021. The DPA applies to all BVI companies, limited partnerships, other entities, such as data controllers and non-BVI entities that use data processing equipment in the BVI or use the BVI for data transmission. The DPA is modeled after the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and requires an individual or entity’s consent prior to data processing. Additionally, the law requires that data controllers implement data protection safeguards before they transfer personal data out of the BVI. Altogether, the DPA aligns with the international movement towards stringent data privacy laws as governments seek more accountability from companies managing personal data. Managers with BVI funds should consult offshore counsel to ensure compliance with the DPA.

Other Matters.

Treasury Form SHC Due by Owners of Foreign Securities on December 31, 2021. Investment advisers, managers, administrators, and fund sponsors that are involved in master-feeder structures established both inside and outside of the U.S. should report such interests to the Treasury by filing a Form SHC no later than December 31, 2021. This includes a U.S. feeder fund, created by a U.S. investment manager / fund sponsor (“IM / FS”) entity, that holds, as a portfolio investment, interests in a foreign master fund. The portfolio investment by the U.S. feeder fund will need to be reported by the IM / FS as the representative of the U.S. feeder. Conversely, if the IM / FS is a foreign entity, the U.S. feeder fund will need to self-report the ownership interest in the foreign master fund as ownership of foreign equity on the Form SHC. The Treasury provides further directions regarding how to know if you must report ownership of such foreign securities.

European Union Announces Delay of Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (“SFDR”) Rollout. As a reminder, the EU’s SFDR will now be implemented on July 1, 2022, instead of January 1, 2022. The SFDR is a series of disclosure requirements for asset managers intended to increase the transparency of a fund’s sustainability and environmental impact. Please refer to our previous update for more information.

California Lenders’ License Update. As a reminder, the DFPI announced that starting on October 1, 2021 applications under California Financing Law (“CFL”) must be submitted through the Nationwide Multistate System and Registry (“NMLS”). Existing licenses must be transitioned onto NMLS by December 31, 2021. Please refer to our previous update for more information.

****

Compliance Calendar

Please note the following important dates as you plan your regulatory compliance timeline for the coming months: 

Deadline	Filing
December 13	Deadline for paying annual IARD charges and state renewal fees, through IARD.
December 16	Cayman Islands FATCA and CRS reporting deadlines.
December 26	Last day to submit form filings via IARD prior to year-end.
December 31	Review RAUM to determine 2021 Form PF filing requirement.
December 31	Small and mid-sized registered CPOs must submit a pool quarterly report (CPO-PQR).
December 31	Cayman funds regulated by CIMA that intend to de-register (i.e. wind down or continue as an exempted fund) should do so before this date to avoid 2022 CIMA fees.
January 11	Amended Form 13H filing due if any information on the previously filed Form 13H became inaccurate during the prior quarter.
January 15	Quarterly Form PF due for large liquidity fund advisers (if applicable).
January 31	“Annex IV” AIFMD filing.
February 16	Quarterly Form 13F due.
February 16	Annual Form 13H updates due.
March 1	Quarterly Form PF due for larger hedge fund advisers (if applicable).
March 1	Deadline for annual affirmation of CFTC exemptions.
March 31	Deadline to update and file Form ADV Parts 1, 2A &2B.
March 31	Cayman Islands CRS Compliance Form deadline.
Periodic	Fund Managers should perform “Bad Actor” certifications annually.
Periodic	Form D and Blue Sky Filings should be current.
Periodic	CPO/CTA Annual Questionnaires must be submitted annually, and promptly upon material information changes, through NFA Annual Questionnaire system.

Please contact us with any questions or for assistance with any of the above topics.

Sincerely,

Karl Cole-Frieman, Bart Mallon, Lilly Palmer, David Rothschild, & Scott Kitchens

****

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP is a premier boutique investment management law firm, providing top-tier, responsive, and cost-effective legal solutions for financial services matters. Headquartered in San Francisco, Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP services both start-up investment managers, as well as multi-billion-dollar firms. The firm provides a full suite of legal services to the investment management community, including hedge fund, private equity fund, venture capital fund, mutual fund formation, adviser registration, counterparty documentation, SEC, CFTC, NFA and FINRA matters, seed deals, hedge fund due diligence, employment and compensation matters, and routine business matters. The firm also publishes the prominent Hedge Fund Law Blog, which focuses on legal issues that impact the hedge fund community. For more information, please add us on LinkedIn and visit us at colefrieman.com.