Category Archives: Hedge Fund Structure

Do Commodity Pool Operators also need to be registered as Commodity Trading Advisors?

A common question for hedge fund managers which are registered as commodity pool operators is whether they also need to be registered as commodity trading advisors (CTA) with the NFA.  The answer is generally no.

There is no need for a commodity-based hedge fund manager (i.e., CPO) to register as a CTA so long as the manager’s commodity trading advice is restricted solely to advising the pool it is running.  This applies to BOTH CFTC/NFA Registered AND unregistered pool operators.  However, if the CPO has clients outside of the pool which the CPO provides advice to regarding commodities, then the manager may need to be registered as a CTA.

Rule 4.14(a)(4) applies to those managers which are registered as CPOs with the NFA.  Rule 4.14(a)(5) applies to those managers which are not registered (exempt) as CPOs.  The full rules are below.

Rule 4.14(a)(4)

A person is not required to register under the Act as a commodity trading advisor if it is registered under the Act as a commodity pool operator and the person’s commodity trading advice is directed solely to, and for the sole use of, the pool or pools for which it is so registered.

Rule 4.14(a)(5)

A person is not required to register under the Act as a commodity trading advisor if it is exempt from registration as a commodity pool operator and the person’s commodity trading advice is directed solely to, and for the sole use of, the pool or pools for which it is so exempt.
Please contact us if you have any questions.  Other HFLB articles related to this topic include:

Related HFLB articles:

Mini-Prime Brokers – Prime Brokerage for Start-up, Small and Mid-Sized Hedge Funds

Historically, prime brokerage was relegated to a few of the very large Wall Street investment houses – the Goldmans, Merrills, Bears and Lehmans.  Many of these firms  provided prime brokerage services to the very large hedge funds.  However, these firms could not provide the comprehensive trading services required by smaller hedge funds because the relationships were not as profitable as the relationships with larger hedge funds.  Eventually the large prime brokers began to neglect the smaller hedge funds (those with less than $50 or $100 million in assets) which made way for the “mini-prime brokers.”

Mini-prime brokers are registered broker-dealers that essentially act as introducing firms to the prime brokers and handle the front end relationship while the trading, execution, clearing and custody are handled through the back end of the large prime brokerage firms.  Mini-prime brokers fill an important niche for smaller hedge funds who desire better support services than the discount or online brokerages provide, but who are not yet big enough to get the very personalized services that bigger funds receive from the large prime brokers.

Types of Instruments

Mini-prime brokers have access to the same investments as the large prime brokerage firms, including stocks, bonds, options, futures and foreign exchange.  Additionally, mini-primes have access to the executing primes short box so that managers can short as well as go long.

Access to Soft Dollars and Trading Platforms

In addition to brokerage and custody, many mini-prime brokers also provide small and start-up managers with many additional services.  Such services may include soft dollar services, operational services, back office services and potentially even capital introduction services.  Many of the mini-prime brokers will also provide their customers with complementary access to many of the most popular trading platforms like REDIPlus, Bloomberg and Neovest.  Each mini-prime will be able to provide different services and execution prices and a hedge fund manager should talk with a few before making a decision.

Conclusion

For a start-up or small hedge fund manager, a mini-prime will be a better choice than the large prime broker.  In general, a mini-prime can provide all the same services that a large prime broker can, and the mini-prime will probably be able to better respond to a small manager’s needs.  Fund investors are also more comfortable with the fact that custody of the hedge fund’s assets will also be maintained at the large brokerage firm.

A hedge fund attorney will be able to provide a start-up manager with referrals for prime and mini-prime brokerage services.  Please contact us if you have any questions or would like recommendations for hedge fund mini-prime brokers. Other HFLB articles:

Overview of Issues Related to ERISA Hedge Fund Investments

This article outlines the issues which are central to ERISA plans when such plans invest in hedge funds. The information comes from a report prepared by the Government Accountability Office and provides hedge fund managers with a good informational foundation of the issues which matter to ERISA plans. As ERISA is a very important set of federal laws a hedge fund manager should be especially diligent about making sure all proposed transactions are lawful. In a recent ERISA article we discussed how a hedge fund’s assets were frozen because of an unlawful transaction between the hedge fund manager and an ERISA fiduciary .

Please also note that with regard to the article below, HFLB has not prepared any of the items in here but we have added titles and brackets.  A complete copy of the GAO report can be found here.  If a manager has a specific ERISA question the manager should talk to an attorney to discuss the specific facts of the ERISA matter.

ERISA Prudent Man Standard

Private sector pension plan investment decisions must comply with the provisions of ERISA, which stipulates fiduciary standards based on the principle of a prudent man standard. Under ERISA, plan sponsors and other fiduciaries must (1) act solely in the interest of the plan participants and beneficiaries and in accordance with plan documents; (2) invest with the care, skill, and diligence of a prudent person with knowledge of such matters; and (3) diversify plan investments to minimize the risk of large losses. Under ERISA, the prudence of any individual investment is considered in the context of the total plan portfolio, rather than in isolation.*

Hence, a relatively risky investment may be considered prudent, if it is part of a broader strategy to balance the risk and expected return to the portfolio. In addition to plan sponsors, under the ERISA definition of a fiduciary, any other person that has discretionary authority or control over a plan asset is subject to ERISA’s fiduciary standards.** The Employee Benefit Security Administration (EBSA) at Labor [the U.S. Department of Labor] is responsible for enforcing these provisions of ERISA, as well as educating and assisting retired workers and plan sponsors. Another federal agency, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), collects premiums from federally insured plans in order to insure the benefits of retirees if a plan terminates without sufficient assets to pay promised benefits.

* ERISA’s prudent man standard is satisfied if the fiduciary has given appropriate consideration to the following factors (1) the composition of the plan portfolio with regard to diversification of risk; (2) the volatility of the plan investment portfolio with regard to general movements of investment prices; (3) the liquidity of the plan investment portfolio relative to the funding objectives of the plan; (4) the projected return of the plan investment portfolio relative to the funding objectives of the plan; and (5) the prevailing and projected economic conditions of the entities in which the plan has invested and proposes to invest. 29 C.F.R. § 2550.404a-1(b) (2007).

** Under ERISA, a fiduciary is a person who (1) exercises discretionary authority or control over plan management or any authority or control over plan assets; (2) renders investment advice regarding plan moneys or property for direct or indirect compensation; or (3) has discretionary authority or responsibility for plan administration. 29 U.S.C. §1002(21).

Discussion of State Sponsored Plans

In the public sector, governments have established pension plans at state, county, and municipal levels, as well as for particular categories of employees, such as police officers, fire fighters, and teachers. The structure of public pension plan systems can differ considerably from state to state. In some states, most or all public employees are covered by a single consolidated DB [defined benefit] retirement plan, while in other states many retirement plans exist for various units of government and employee groups. Public sector DB plans are not subject to funding, vesting and most other requirements applicable to private sector DB plans under ERISA, but must follow requirements established for them under applicable state law. While states generally have adopted standards essentially identical to the ERISA prudent man standard, specific provisions of law and regulation vary from state to state. Public plans are also not insured by the PBGC, but could call upon state or local taxpayers in the event of a funding shortfall.

Hedge Fund Investments Allowed under ERISA; Due Diligence Required; 25% Threshold

Although ERISA governs the investment practices of private sector pension plans, neither federal law nor regulation specifically limit pension investment in hedge funds or private equity. Instead, ERISA requires that plan fiduciaries apply a prudent man standard, including diversifying assets and minimizing the risk of large losses. The prudent man standard does not explicitly prohibit investment in any specific category of investment.* Further, an unsuccessful individual investment is not considered a per se violation of the prudent man standard, as it is the plan fiduciary’s overall management of the plan’s portfolio that is evaluated under the standard.** In addition, the standard focuses on the process for making investment decisions, requiring documentation of the investment decisions, due diligence, and ongoing monitoring of any managers hired to invest plan assets.

*However, ERISA may indirectly limit a pension plan’s ability to invest in specific hedge funds or private equity funds. Under Labor’s plan asset regulation, if the aggregate investment by benefit plan investors in the equity interest of a particular entity is “significant,” and that equity interest is not (i) a publicly-offered security, (ii) issued by a registered investment company, such as a mutual fund, nor (iii) issued by an operating company, then the assets of that entity are deemed assets of each benefit plan investor (i.e., plan assets). See 29 C.F.R. § 2510.3-101 (2007). As a result, any person who exercises management authority over the entity now deemed to hold plan assets will become subject to ERISA’s fiduciary standards. The equity investments by benefit plan investors are considered “significant” if at any time the aggregate investment of the benefit plan investors represents 25 percent or more of the value of any class of equity in the entity. According to one industry expert, in order to avoid being deemed a plan fiduciary (and assuming all of the liabilities that accompany that status), many managers of hedge funds, which generally are not publicly-traded, not registered investment companies, nor operating companies, carefully monitor the level of investments in the hedge fund by benefit plan investors to ensure that their aggregate investment remains below the 25 percent threshold. Prior to the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA), the calculation of the 25 percent threshold pertained to investments by ERISA plans and certain non-ERISA covered plans, such as public sector and foreign retirement plans. However, in accordance with section 611(f) of the PPA, investments by certain plans, including public sector and foreign retirement plans, are now excluded from the calculation. Pub. L. No.109-280, § 611(f), 120 Stat. 780, 972 (codified at 29 U.S.C. § 1002(42)). This modification may facilitate an increase in the level of investments by pension plans in hedge funds and private equity funds.

**With some exceptions, ERISA does prohibit plans from investing more than 10 percent of plan assets in the sponsoring company’s stock. See 29 U.S.C. § 1107. In addition to requiring plan fiduciaries to adhere to certain standards of conduct, ERISA also prohibits plan fiduciaries from engaging in specified transactions. See 29 U.S.C. § 1106.

Best Practices in Hedge Fund Investing

Although there are no specific federal limitations on pension plan investments in hedge funds, two federal advisory committees have, in recent years, highlighted the importance of developing best practices in hedge fund investing. In November 2006, the ERISA Advisory Council recommended that Labor publish guidance describing the unique features of hedge funds, and matters for consideration in their adoption for use by qualified pension plans.* To date, Labor has not acted on this recommendation. According to Labor officials, an effort to address these recommendations was postponed while Labor focused on implementing various aspects of the Pension Protection Act of 2006.**

However, in April 2008, the Investors’ Committee established by the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets, composed of representatives of public and private pension plans, endowments and foundations, organized labor, non-U.S. institutions, funds of hedge funds, and the consulting community, released draft best practices for investors in hedge funds.*** These best practices discuss the major challenges of hedge fund investing, and provide an in-depth discussion of specific considerations and practices that investors in hedge funds should take. While this guidance should serve as an additional tool for pension plan fiduciaries and investors to use when assessing whether and to what degree hedge funds would be a wise investment, it may not fully address the investing challenges unique to pension plans leaving some vulnerable to inappropriate investments in hedge funds.

*The ERISA Advisory Council was created by ERISA to provide advice to the Secretary of Labor. 29 U.S.C. § 1142.

**The PPA is the most recent comprehensive reform of federal pension laws since the enactment of ERISA. It establishes new funding requirements for DB pensions and includes reforms that will affect cash balance pension plans, defined contribution plans, and deferred compensation plans for executives and highly compensated employees.

***Principles and Best Practices for Hedge Fund Investors: Report of the Investors’ Committee to the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets, April 15, 2008. The President’s Working Group on Financial Markets includes the heads of the U.S. Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve, the SEC, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

How Hedge Funds Report Investments to Labor

Labor does not specifically monitor pension investment in hedge funds or private equity. Labor annually collects information on private sector pension plan investments via the Form 5500, on which plan sponsors report information such as the plan’s operation, funding, assets, and investments. However, the Form 5500 includes no category for hedge funds or private equity funds, and plan sponsors may record these investments in various categories on the form’s Schedule H. In addition, because there is no universal definition of hedge funds or private equity and their strategies vary, their holdings can fall within many asset classes. While EBSA officials analyze Form 5500 data for reporting compliance issues—including looking for assets that are “hard to value”—they have not focused on hedge fund or private equity investments specifically.* According to EBSA officials, there have been several investigations and enforcement actions in recent years that involved investments in hedge funds and private equity, but these investments have not raised significant concerns.

*“Hard to value” assets are those that are not traded on an exchange. “Hard to value” assets may include hedge funds, private equity funds, and real estate. It is difficult to distinguish the type of investment with the information provided. Federal agency officials use the Form 5500 report data to enforce ERISA pension requirements, monitor plan compliance, develop aggregate pension statistics, and conduct policy and economic research.

Other related HFLB articles:

Hedge Fund Formation for January 1, 2009 Launch – Start Today!

The end of the year tends to be a busy time for hedge fund attorneys as many managers are deciding to prepare hedge funds for launch on January 1.  As we’ve noted in previous articles it can take 6-8 weeks to get a hedge fund launched depending on the investment program.  Accordingly, this is a reminder to all potential hedge fund managers that it is time to start discussing your hedge fund launch with an attorney if you want to have the fund ready for January 1.

Some of the issues that will need to be discussed and planned include:

For more information please see our start up hedge fund timeline and please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or would like to schedule a consultation with a hedge fund attorney.

Style Drift and Hedge Funds

Style drift is a very important issue for hedge fund managers.  Style drift is basically a change in the hedge fund’s investment strategy from what was defined in the hedge fund’s offering documents.  Normally style drift will start small and get larger.  Some managers will not need to worry about style drift if they’ve crafted a sufficiently broad investment program which allows them to invest in any instruments and without regard to any sort of position limits.

It will be difficult for most investors to detect style drift unless the manager reports its positions as well as its monthly or quarterly profit and losses. However, if a hedge fund manager get sued, one of the first things that the plaintiff’s attorney will do is see if the manager stuck to the investment program as it was laid out in the fund’s offering documents (which includes, if applicable, powerpoints and other marketing materials).  If the hedge fund manager strays from the investment program then the aggrieved investor will have a very good case against the manager.

Some commentators and lawyers believe that we are likely to see investor lawsuits arise as a result of losses from style drift.  These commentators believe that managers may look outside of the stated investment objectives in order to chase returns in this volatile investment environment.  We urge all investment managers to stay within the stated investment objectives and to discuss a potential change with their attorney.

Style drift is an especially important issue for institutional investors, including fund of funds, who have invested in certain hedge funds based on their own asset allocation parameters.  Sometimes institutional investors and fund of funds will request investment level disclosure to monitor this risk – this will normally be laid out in a side letter if the manager does not provide this level of transparency through the offering documents.  Typically the hedge fund prime broker or the administrator can provide position level reporting to the investor.

Related HFLB articles:

Distressed Debt Fund of Hedge Funds to be Launched Soon

As many hedge funds scramble to keep investor’s from redeeming and/or proposing to restructure the terms of the fund, other funds are getting ready for the next wave of hot investments: distressed assets.

As evidence that money will be moving into these areas is a story by Reuters about a new launch of a distressed debt fund of funds.  According to the article, the fund of funds will invest in other distressed asset hedge funds and will have a two year lock up person.  GAM chief executive David M. Solo told Reuters that “We are completing a thorough review of a range of the best managers in the U.S. and Europe so as to create a diversified vehicle to benefit from this unique opportunity.”

While this is the first article I have seen announcing a fund of funds focusing on this asset strategy, there are likely to be more of these fund of funds launching in the future.  The New York Times also ran a story this morning about “vulture investors” sitting on the sidelines for now.  While the NYT article discusses players biding their time, it also notes that the “volume of loan portfolios sold in the first three weeks of October has already beaten the previous monthly record.”  This indicates that the area is heating up and is likely to be a popular strategy near the end of this year and the beginning of next.  Additionally, other types of credit based funds, like asset based lending funds, are likely to be popular in the next year as the credit markets continue to be locked.

Investing in distressed assets has always been one of the central hedge fund strategies.  These investments might include investing in distressed debt and other types of distressed assets.  One of the bigger issues for investors in distressed asset hedge funds is going to be lock-up period.  Because the asset class is not as liquid, the lock-up for investors is going to be longer, as it will generally be in the hedge fund industry going forward.

Other relevant articles include:

Hedge Fund Manager – Information on Hedge Fund Managers

I have seen many hedge fund managers and, like the investment strategies they pursue, each one is different.  This article will attempt to discuss hedge fund managers in general, if you have any specific questions, please feel free to contact us.

Who are hedge fund managers?

In general hedge fund managers are people who have a strong conviction about their certain investment program and who are willing to put their money where their mouth is so to speak.  At any given time there are any number of different ways to make money and because of this we have a chance to see all types of hedge fund managers, even those who go against conventional wisdom.

What types of backgrounds do hedge fund managers have?

I have seen all types of hedge fund managers.  Many were traders at other investment advisory firms or were brokers at a broker or investment bank.  Many managers were previously employed outside of the financial industry and traded for themselves on the side – managers like this have often found a program that works and want to allow their friends, family and other investors participate in the investment program and potential gains.  Some hedge fund managers were involved in real estate and choose to run a real estate hedge fund or some sort of hybrid hedge fund.  Some managers have relatively less experience in managing money and will act as a kind of sponsor of the hedge fund – participating in the business aspects of the hedge fund like raising assets.

Most all hedge fund managers will have at least a college degree.  Many hedge fund managers, and analysts, will also have a Masters in Business Administration (MBA).  Some hedge fund managers will be former professionals such as doctors or lawyers.  It is also common to see a manager with a third party designation like a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) which is bestowed by the CFA Institute.

Are there any exam or qualification requirements to be a hedge fund manager?

There are no specific requirements to be a hedge fund manager, but depending on the domicile of the manager he may need to be registered as an investment advisor with the state securities commission or the SEC.  If a manager was required to be registered as an investment advisor, he would likely need to have the Series 65 exam license or the Series 7 and Series 66.  Depending on the nature of the hedge fund and the extent of the hedge fund’s activities, the manager may need to have the Series 7 and the fund, or a related company, would need to be registered as a broker-dealer.

Is there anything hedge fund managers cannot do?

Generally a hedge fund manager can mold his investment program as he sees fit.  However there are two specific items to note.  First, the manager should be careful when trading that he stays within the description of the trading program.  Especially in these very volatile times, investors are very aware of style drift and managers should be very cognizant of this.

Second, the hedge fund manager cannot violate any laws while trading.  The federal securities laws apply to hedge fund managers who are not registered as investment advisers in certain instances.  In addition to out and out fraud, the manager should not engage in any activities which he is not sure is legal.  If there are any questions, the hedge fund manager should consult a hedge fund attorney.

What are the common qualities of hedge fund managers?

The number one commonality between hedge fund managers is a desire to see their program and ideas come to fruition.  Another trait which is common to hedge fund managers is a very strong work ethic.

What about pedigree?

You will often hear advisors and consultants talk about pedigree, especially hedge fund marketers.  To these groups the term “pedigree” essentially means the strength of the manager’s bio.  A manager who went to Harvard undergrad, Harvard MBA and then worked for Goldman Sachs will have a strong pedigree.  It is generally going to be easier for a manager with a strong pedigree to get his foot in the door with regard to institutions and high net worth investors.

However, having a strong pedigree does not guarantee a hedge fund manager will be able to sell his hedge fund to investors.  Indeed, I have seen firsthand instances where a manager with a strong pedigree did very poorly in front of institutional investors.  Likewise, I have seen where a manager with a less strong pedigree shot the lights out during an institutional investor presentation.  All this is to say that while pedigree is important in the eyes of some, it will not necessarily help a hedge fund manager to raise assets and of course, once a manager has assets, the manager must perform.

Start up hedge fund managers

If you are a start up hedge fund manager, you will first need to discuss the hedge fund formation process with a hedge fund attorney.  Some other articles which provide background on many of the subjects covered in this article include:

Hedge Fund Side Pocket Investments

Overview of Side Pockets

In general hedge fund side pocket investments are illiquid investments which the hedge fund manager places into a side pocket account.  Mechanically the side pocket account is simply an entry on the hedge fund’s books which is tracked separate from the liquid, non side pocket investments.  The structure is flexible so that an asset can be deemed a side pocket asset at any time – either at the time of purchase or at a later date.  Typically a follow-on investment to an investment in a side pocket account will also be placed in the side pocket.  Hedge fund managers will usually place an outside limit on the amount of assets which can be placed in the side pocket investments, usually calculated as a percentage of the fund’s assets and based on the purchase price of the side pocket investment. There are potentially additional issues for side pocket accounts in a master-feeder structure which should be discussed by the hedge fund attorney.

The actual mechanics of the side pocket account will be discussed in the hedge fund offering documents.  It is advisable that the manager discuss the side pocket provision with the administrator and the auditor as well to make sure that all of the service providers are comfortable with the mechanics of the account.

The following asset types are usually good candidates for side pocket accounts:

  • Real Estate
  • PIPEs
  • Thinly traded securities
  • Private Equity investments
  • Any follow-on investment related to the above

Reasons for the side pocket account

The main reason to have a side pocket investment is so that the manager does not get under or overpaid from a valuation before an investment is sold.  For instance, if the manager held a piece of property in a non-side pocket account it would be difficult to find a valuation for the property at the end of a performance fee period.  Because managers are paid a performance fee (or allocated gains) on unrealized as well as realized investments, there is the potential for the manager to overstate the hedge funds unrealized gains by overvaluing the piece of property.

Another characteristic of the side pocket account is that a withdrawing investor cannot receive any part of his investment which is in the side pocket account.  This allows the manager the flexibility to sell an illiquid asset on the manager’s terms and not merely to satisfy an investor’s redemption request.  Once the side pocket investment is liquidated, appropriate distributions are made to the investor which has made a previous redemption.

Please feel free to contact us with any questions.  Other articles which relate to this subject include:

Hedge Fund PIPE Transactions

What are PIPE transactions?

The SEC has defined a PIPE transaction as follows:

“PIPE” stands for “private investment in public equity.” In a PIPE offering, investors commit to purchase a certain number of restricted shares from a company at a specified price. The company agrees, in turn, to file a resale registration statement so that the investors can resell the shares to the public. To the extent that they increase the supply of a company’s stock in the market, PIPE offerings can potentially dilute the value of existing shares.  (Source)

Hedge Fund Investments – PIPE transactions

PIPE transactions can be a part of a hedge fund investment strategy and in some cases a whole investment strategy. Generally hedge fund managers who focus on PIPE investments are hoping for a large exit strategy such as a reverse merger or a public offering.  Such managers have experience in the PIPE space and have concluded many PIPE transactions.

For such hedge fund managers, there are many considerations with regard to these investments including:

Structure – hedge fund managers who invest in PIPEs can be very creative when it comes to the structure of their hedge fund.  The fund can be structured as a private equity fund, a normal hedge fund or a combination.  A manager should discuss the options with his attorney.

Side Pocket Investments – based on the structure of the fund, the manager may want to institute side pocket investments.  Side pocket investments allow a manager to segregate certain illiquid or hard to value assets until a disposition of the asset.  A side pocket investment would be more likely in a normal hedge fund or a combination fund.  Many PIPE hedge funds have side pocket investments.

Lock-up – because of the recent market volatility and the rush for redemptions, many managers are re-examining their lock-up periods.  For hedge funds with investments in illiquid securities, this is especially important from a cash management perspective.  The manager should spend some time discussing the lock-up with the attorney; the lock-up should generally be a little longer than the expected time horizon of the investments.  For example, if the fund will make PIPE investments which is expected to have an 18 month duration then the lock-up should not be only a year.

Investment program – the manager will need to define the areas and limits of the investment program in the offering documents.  While broad and vague investment programs have generally been acceptable, it is likely that investors are going to want to know more specifics of the program going forward.  The manager will want to describe what types of companies it will invest in, what types of securities it will recieve (common stock, warrants, and convertible instruments), what the manager looks for in a potential company/ management team, what is the expected duration of the investment, among other items.  Of course the manager should include a component dealing with its risk management procedures as well.

Fee range – generally PIPE investments will follow the standard fee range for hedge funds.  The manager may choose to institute a higher management fee.  Additionally, thought should be given to the fund’s expenses in making investments.

Risks and Other Considerations for PIPE hedge funds

Liquidity – the PIPE securities which the hedge fund owns are not liquid.  Accordingly the hedge fund manager will need to closely manage the hedge fund’s cash.  While manager used to be able to rely on some sort of credit facility to take care of the fund’s cash management needs, this is not as likely to be the case in the tight credit markets today.

Valuation – like many hedge fund strategies the central concern for hedge funds with a PIPE program is going to be valuation.  The fund will hold some of the more illiquid assets – restricted securities which cannot be sold for a certain amount of time.  As with other programs with liquidity issues, the basic methods of valuation include: (1) book value; (2) outside valuation agent; or (3) by formula. There are advantages and disadvantages to each one of these methods and if you need to have a valuation methodology your lawyer will be able to help you to decide on one of theses methods.  A manager should also discuss the valuation with the administrator and the auditor as well.

Contractual risk – there is a risk that the underlying company would not honor the contractual provisions of the PIPE transaction.  In such a case it is likely that a hedge fund would seek to enforce its contractual rights through the court system which is both time consuming and expensive.

Regulatory risks – there are various regulatory risks associated with PIPE investments.  Central is an investigation into the PIPE transaction by the SEC.  As discussed in greater depth below, the SEC is very interested in PIPE transactions. There is also the risk that, as a reseller of securities, the fund may deemed to be an underwriter which would subject it to further regulation – the hedge fund manager and attorney should discuss this issue.

Due Diligence – the fund managers must conduct research and due diligence on the underlying company.  This type of research is typically more involved than many hedge fund investing strategies.  If the manager will be conducting in-person reviews of the company and the company’s management team, the manager should discuss this with the hedge fund attorney so that the offering documents explicitly state that such expenses be paid by the fund instead of the management company.

SEC on PIPE transactions

The SEC has taken many enforcement actions over the years on PIPE transactions.  Hedge fund managers should be especially aware of this because the SEC is on the lookout and the fines are stiff.  Below are a few of the many actions the SEC has taken to stop abusive PIPE transactions:

SEC v. Deephaven Capital Management, LLC (release)

In this case a hedge fund manager traded on insider information.  The manager received information that a PIPE transaction would be announced and sold short the publicly traded securities of the company.  When the PIPE transaction was announced, the stock went lower and the fund made large gains.  The manager had to disgorge the profits and was subject to a fine.

SEC v. Joseph J. Spiegel (release)

This case represents a classic PIPE case – the hedge fund manager agreed to participate in a PIPE transaction and then sold the company’s stock short, against representations that he would not.  When the restricted stock became unrestricted, he used this stock to cover his previous short.  The manager had to pay a fine and was also barred from association with any investment advisor for five years.

SEC v. Jeanne M. Rowzee, James R. Halstead, and Robert T. Harvey (release)

In this case fraudsters promoted investments in PIPE transactions but never invested the money and instead spent lavishly on themselves.  In classic Ponzi Scheme fashion, the fraudsters solicited new investors to pay off the original investors.

As always, please feel free to contact us if you have any questions.  Additional resources which relate to this post include:

Hedge Fund Graduated Performance Fees

No two hedge funds or hedge fund managers are the same – the same is also true for hedge fund performance fees which can take any structure that the hedge fund manager fancies.  I have seen many different styles of performance fees and many different hedge fund hurdle rates.

Some managers will institute “graduated” performance fees.  The graduated performance fee is characterized by fees which change based on the returns to the partnership.  The fee is typically calculated on gross returns.  Many times you will see a hurdle rate with a graduated performance fee. An example of a graduated performance fee follows:

  • Returns up to 20% will be charged a 20% performance fee
  • Returns of 20% to 40% will be charged a 25% performance fee
  • Returns of 40% to 50% will be charged a 35% performance fee
  • Returns greater than 50% will be charged a 40% performance fee

There are two different ways the fee can be applied.  The fee can be on the overall returns or it can be on the returns from the plateau only.  Using the numbers from above, here is how it would work:

If straight 20% performance fee applies:

Total
Return    % to Manager        % to Investors
20%        4%                        16%
40%        8%                        32%
50%        10%                      40%
60%        12%                      48%

If fee applies to overall returns:

Total
Return    % to Manager        % to Investors
20%        4%                        16%
40%        10%                      30%
50%        17.5%                   32.5%
60%        24%                      36%

If fee applies to return on each plateau only:

Total
Return    % to Manager        % to Investors
20%        4%                        16%
40%        9%                        31%
50%        12.5%                   38.5%
60%        16.5%                   43.5%

The purpose of the graduated performance fee is to provide greater marginal compensation to the hedge fund manager when the fund’s performance is particularly good.  One downfall of the graduated performance fee is the potential for the manager to take excessive risks once a certain return level has been reached in order to get to a higher performance plateau.  Generally, it seems that in my experience, both investors and managers can benefit from the graduated performance fee structure.  As I noted above, though, each hedge fund fee structure is different and a graduated performance fee may not be appropriate in all situations.

Other related articles:

Please contact us if you would like to discuss performance fees or other issues.