Author Archives: CFM Admin

Hedge Fund Events January 2011

The following are various hedge fund events happening this month. Please email us if you would like us to add your event to this list.

****

January 6

January 12-14

January 11

January 11

January 12

January 18

January 18

January 19

January 19

January 19-21

January 20

January 20

January 20

January 20-21

January 24

January 25

January 26

January 26-27

January lasix without rx 27

January 27

January 27

January 27

January 27

January 27

January 31

****

Bart Mallon, Esq. runs the hedge fund law blog and provides hedge fund registration and compliance services to hedge fund managers through Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP, a leading hedge fund law firm.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Form ADV Requirements for Exempt Reporting Advisers

As we’ve discussed previously, the SEC has proposed two new exemptions from SEC registration for certain firms who would otherwise be required to register with the SEC as investment advisers:

  1. Section 203(l) (see Rule 203(l)-1) generally exempts investment advisers who only advise one or more “venture capital funds” and
  2. Section 203(m) (See Rule 203(m)-1) generally exempts investment advisers who only advise private funds and have AUM in the U.S. of less than $150MM.

To implement these new exemptions and to assist the SEC with identifying such advisers, their owners, their business models, and any potential risks to investors, proposed Rule 204-4 would require these “exempt reporting advisers” (“ERAs”) to submit, and to periodically update, reports to the SEC by completing specific items on Form ADV.

This article provides an overview of what information ERAs would have to report.

****

ERA Reporting Items

Proposed Rule 204-4 requires exempt reporting advisers to provide the SEC with the following items on Form ADV:

  • Item 1 – Identifying Information
    • A new question would require ERAs (and registered advisers) to indicate whether the adviser had $1 billion or more in AUM to assist the SEC in identifying excessive incentive-based compensation arrangements.
    • ERAs (and registered advisers) would be required to provide contact information for the adviser’s chief compliance officer, indicate whether any control person is a public reporting company, and add “limited partnership” as a cohise advisers can select to indicate how their organization is formed.
  • Item 2C – SEC Reporting by Exempt Reporting Advisers
  • Item 3 – Form of Organization
  • Item 6 – Other Business Activities:  this item would require the ERAs to indicate the advisers other business activities.  The list of activities would be expanded to include trust companies, registered municipal advisors, registered security-based swap dealers, majority security-based swap participants, and accountant firms.
  • Item 7 – Financial Industry Affiliations from Private Fund Reporting: this item would be expanded as Item 6 will be expanded.
  • Item 10 – Control Persons
  • Item 11 – Disclosure Information
    • ERAs (and registered advisers) would have to indicate whether the disclosure (i.e. criminal, regulatory) pertains to the adviser or any of its supervised persons
  • Schedule A – Direct Owners
  • Schedule B – Indirect Owners
  • Schedule C – Amendments to Schedule A and B
  • Schedule D
    • Items 6 and 7.A. would require additional information corresponding with the answers provided in Items 6 and 7 in the main part of Form ADV.
    • Item 7.B. would require ERAs (and registered advisers) to provide more information about the private funds they (and not their related persons) advise, which generally includes all pooled investment vehicles, regardless of whether they are organized as limited partnerships.
    • Item 7.B.1. would require ERAs (and registered advisers) to provide more information about the basic organizational, operation, and investment characteristics of the fund, amount of assets, nature of the investors, and service providers.
    • Part A of Item 7.B.1. would also require additional information including:
      • the name of the fund (including an option to preserve the anonymity of the private fund client);
      • the state or country where the fund is organized;
      • the name of the general partner, directors, trustees or other persons with similar positions;
      • the organization of the fund (e.g. master-feeder);
      • regulatory status of the fund; and
      • other questions about the fund’s investment activities (e.g. size of the fund, gross/net assets, minimum investment amounts, conflicts of interest, etc.)
    • Part B of Item 7.B.1. would require ERAs (and registered advisers) to provide information about the 5 types of service providers that generally perform the “gatekeeper” role for a fund–auditors, prime brokers, custodians, administrators and marketers.

The ERA would not be required to prepare a client brochure (Form ADV Part 2).

Updates to Form ADV

In addition to filing an initial Form ADV, ERAs would also be required to file updating amendments (pursuant to the new amendment to Rule 204-1).  Rule 204-1 would require ERAs, like registered advisers, to amend Form ADV:

  • at least annually, within 90 days of the fiscal year end;
  • more frequently, as required by Form ADV.  The new General Instruction 4 of Form ADV would require ERAs to update Items 1, 3, and 11 if they become inaccurate in any way.  They would be required to update Item 10 if it becomes materially inaccurate; and
  • pursuant to Rule 204-4, the ERA would have to amend Form ADV when it ceases to be an ERA (indicate it is filing a final report pursuant to Rule 204-4).  Note: many times, the adviser would be simultaneously applying for registration.

Filing Deadlines

ERAs would be required to file their initial report on Form ADV by August 20, 2011.

Filing Fee

The ERAs would have to pay a filing fee charged by FINRA.   Currently, the SEC anticipates that the fees would be the same as those for registered IAs and range from $40 to $200, based on AUM.

Other Items

Why Form ADV?

The SEC has proposed for ERAs to use Form ADV to meet their reporting requirement because the Buy viagra china Form ADV and IARD system are already established and doing so avoids additional delay and expense related to creating a new form.  In addition, many ERAs will already have to use Form ADV for their state registrations – using Form ADV allows such advisers to satisfy the state requirement and Rule 204-4 in a single filing.  The ERA reports filed via Form ADV will be publicly available on the SEC’s website.

Other Changes to Form ADV

Form ADV would be re-titled to reflect its dual purpose–as the “Uniform Application for IA Registration” and “Report by Exempt Reporting Advisers.”  The ERA would indicate that it was reporting to the SEC, rather than registering with the SEC.

****

Other related hedge fund articles:

Bart Mallon Esq. is a hedge fund attorney and provides hedge fund compliance services through Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Hedge Fund Events October 2010

The following are various hedge fund events happening this month.  Please email us if Safe site to buy cialis you would like us to add your event to this list.

****

October 3-5

October 3-5

October 4-5

October 4-5

October 4-5

October 4-5

October 5-6

October 5-7

October 6

October 6

October 6

October 7

October 8

October 12-13

October 13

October 13

October 14-16

October 14-15

October 18

October 18-19

October 19

October 20

October 20-22

October 25-26

October 25-27

October 27

****

Bart Mallon, Esq. runs the hedge fund law blog and provides hedge fund registration and compliance services to hedge fund managers through Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP, a leading hedge fund law firm.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Bay Area Hedge Fund Event | September 29, 2010

The Bay Area Hedge Fund Roundtable is having an event next week.  Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP will be attending and we hope to see you there.  Details on the event can be found below.

****

The Bay Area Hedge Fund Roundtable presents:

A Conversation About Global Investing Trends – One Year Later

FEATURING:

John Burbank of Passport Capital

Patrick Wolff of Clarium Capital Management

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010 SAN FRANCISCO, CA at 3 PM

Sens Restaurant at 4 Embarcadero Center, Promenade Level

Please RSVP to [email protected]

The Bay Area Hedge Fund Roundtable (“BAHR”) is an informal (and not for profit) organization of members of the Bay Area hedge fund community that was established in 2001.  BAHR strives to provide intelligent, fresh perspectives from industry leaders on current developments and offer an open, casual environment where members can exchange information and expertise and further develop their relationships within the industry.

****

Bart Mallon, Esq. runs the Hedge Fund Law Blog and provides hedge fund legal services through Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP. He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

California Adopts New Part 2 of Form ADV

At the end of July, the SEC adopted amendments to Form ADV Part 2 and the related rules.  The amended Form ADV Part 2 will be used by SEC-registered advisers to meet their disclosure obligations and generally describe the adviser’s services, fees, and strategies.

On September 1, 2010, the California Department of Corporations followed suit and announced its adoption of the new Part 2 as well, effective October 12, 2010 (see California ADV Part 2 Announcement).  This effective date corresponds with the effective date of the SEC’s rule changes.  The Department’s decision will help bring consistency between state and SEC investment adviser registration requirements.

New ADV Part 2

The amended Form ADV Part 2 consists of three parts:

  • the “Firm Brochure” (Part 2A),
  • a Wrap Fee Program Brochure (Part 2A, Appendix 1), and
  • the “Brochure Supplement (Part 2B).

Every investment adviser must complete the Firm Brochure and the Brochure Supplement.  The Firm Brochure, which is filed electronically with the SEC on the IARD system, will include information about the adviser and its business. The Brochure Supplement, which is a brief disclosure document about certain personnel of the adviser, will be provided to clients but not filed with the SEC.

In addition, the new Part 2 will no longer be in the check-the-box format.  Instead, it will take the form of a narrative brochure written in plain English–the purpose of which is to provide clients with a more clear disclosure of the adviser’s business practices, conflicts of interest, and background.

Compliance Dates

Effective October 12, 2010,  for California registered investment advisers, the relevant compliance dates for the new ADV Part 2 are:

  • As of January 1, 2011 all new investment adviser applicants will have to file, through the IARD, the new Part 2 of Form ADV as part of their application.
  • As of January 1, 2011 all licensed investment advisers will need to incorporate the new Part 2 of Form ADV with their next filing of an amendment to Form ADV, or their annual updating amendment to Form ADV.
  • Between October 12, 2010 and January 1, 2011 applicants and current licensed investment advisers filing amendments to their Part II of Form ADV may use either the current Part II or the new Part 2.

With this change, investment advisers should review and become familiar with the new Part 2.  Advisers that are currently registered with the California Securities Regulation Division will have to incorporate the new Part 2 when they file amendments to Form ADV and also when they file the required annual update.  For most advisers with a December 31, 2010 year-end, the deadline for the annual update will be March 31, 2011.

****

Other related hedge fund law articles:

Bart Mallon, Esq. runs the Hedge Fund Law Blog and provides investment adviser registration and compliance services through Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Series 66 Exam

This exam is required by certain states for an individual who wants to register as an investment adviser representative and securities agent.  Passing the Series 66 would be equivalent to passing both the Series 63 and Series 65 exams.  Additionally, individuals are required to pass the Series 7 exam as a prerequisite for taking the Series 66.  This post will provide an overview on the Series 66 exam and some thoughts on both taking and passing the exam.

The Series 66 Basics

What: The exam has a time limit of two hours and 30 minutes and a total of 110 questions, 10 of which are “pretest” questions and do not count in your final score.  The exam covers the following topics: Economic Factors and Business Information; Investment Vehicle Characteristics; Client Investment Recommendations and Strategies; and Laws, Regulations, and Guidelines, including Prohibition on Unethical Business Practices.  You must earn at least 75% to pass the exam.

Where: You can take the exam at most Pearson VUE or Prometric testing centers.

When: You should probably sign up for the exam at least a week prior to taking it, and you can choose the time and date on either the Pearson or Prometric website when you register.

Why: The exam is required for those individuals who want to become both securities agents (generally brokers) and investment adviser representatives.

How to sign up

You can register for the exam by submitting a Form U-4 or Form U-10 through the IARD system online.  Please not that, effective September 15, 2010, FINRA requires individuals to use either their CRD number or FINRA ID number in order to schedule an exam and no longer accepts social security numbers.  If you have any questions regarding registering for an exam, be sure to ask your law firm, compliance consultant, or feel free to contact us.

The cost to take the exam is $128.

How to study for the exam

It is recommended that you obtain a study guide and thoroughly read the entire guide.  NASAA (North American Securities Administration Association) provides a study guide available for download on their website.  Also, Kaplan provides a useful study guide that presents the study material in a simple and easy-to-understand way, and their practice questions are very similar to questions you are likely to see on the actual exam.

Take at least two to three practice exams prior to taking the test, possibly more.  Use memory refreshers such as note cards or other review materials.  Do not cram the morning of the test, as this will probably only make you more anxious.  In fact, it is recommended that you take the exam in the morning after a full night’s rest.

Day of exam

Arrive at the testing center at least 45 minutes prior to taking the exam to allow yourself time to review some of your notes beforehand.  The proctor will require you take off your jackets and place your belongings, including your study material, in a provided locker.  Be sure to have woken up early enough to eat breakfast beforehand and be fully alert during the test.

The exam

The exam is computer-based and will initially instruct you on how to properly answer and mark the following questions.  Note that the beginning of the exam will most likely include the easiest questions, and then the questions will get harder as you reach the middle.  Always attempt to make the most educated guess on questions you do not understand.

The length of the exam might require you to pause and use the restroom or take a break.  Allow yourself time to step away from the computer for a moment, take a drink, and gather your thoughts.  When you encounter difficult questions, you always have the option of marking the question for review.  Never spend an extended period of time on a question, as you will just waste time on answering other questions you might know better.

After you have completed the questions, you will have the option of changing any of your answers.  After completely answering everything, you will receive your score immediately.

If you don’t pass

A number of managers who take the exam do not pass or only come close to passing.  If this is the case, you will need to wait another 30 days before re-taking the exam.  If you do not pass the exam the second time, you will need to wait another 60 days before taking the exam.  If you do not pass either the third or fourth attempt, you will need to wait at least 180 days before taking the exam again.  There is no limit on the number of times allowed for taking a test.

****

Other related hedge fund law articles:

Bart Mallon, Esq. runs the Hedge Fund Law Blog and provides hedge fund start up and legal services through Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP. He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

NFA Petitions CFTC to Amend Rule 4.5

Wants Managers of Commodity/Futures Mutual Funds to Register as CPOs

On August 18, 2010, the NFA filed a revised Petition for Rulemaking with the CFTC requesting that it amend CFTC Rule 4.5 with respect to managers to mutual funds which offer futures and commodities investment opportunities.  Generally, a manager operating a mutual fund that invests in futures and commodities would be a commodity pool operator and would need to register as such with the CFTC.  However, under current CFTC Rule 4.5, the manager could seek exclusion from such registration.  The NFA has become concerned about mutual funds that are not subject to the CFTC/NFA regulatory regime and that are marketed to retail customers as a way to invest in futures and commodities.  The NFA is requesting amendment of Rule 4.5 to restrict this kind of activity.

Background

CFTC Rule 4.5 provides an exclusion from the definition of the term “commodity pool operator” for certain otherwise regulated persons in connection with their operation of specified trading vehicles, including investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Prior to August 2003, mutual fund managers seeking eligibility for exclusion under Rule 4.5 were required to meet the following requirements:

  • they could not market participation in the mutual fund as participation in a commodity pool or a vehicle for trading commodities or futures;
  • they had to represent that commodity futures or options contracts entered into by the fund were for bona fide hedging purposes; and
  • they had to demonstrate that the aggregate initial margin and/or premiums for non-hedging positions did not exceed 5% of the liquidating value of the fund’s portfolio (after taking into account unrealized profits and losses).

In August 2003, the CFTC eliminated these requirements as a condition to be eligible under Rule 4.5.  The NFA is now petitioning for the CFTC to restore these conditions for eligibility.

NFA Petition for Rulemaking

The NFA’s Petition discusses the context for requesting this amendment.  In particular, the NFA has become aware of three mutual funds that recently filed for exclusions under Rule 4.5.  These funds are marketed as vehicles for commodity futures investment, with investments in derivatives and futures products made indirectly through their wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries (for tax and mutual fund regulatory purposes).  In one case, a fund invests up to 25% of its total assets in a subsidiary that leverages assets at a 4:1 ratio–achieving a futures exposure of the full net value of the fund.

The NFA is concerned that such funds, which are active in the commodity futures industry, are not regulated as CPOs by the CFTC and NFA.  The futures mutual fund manager can file a notice with the NFA claiming the Rule 4.5 exclusion under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended.  Accordingly, the fund is not subject to registration or regulation as a commodity pool.  Through its Petition, the NFA seeks to ensure that managers of registered investment companies that are marketed as a commodity pool or an investment vehicle for trading in commodity futures and options and whose funds engage in more than 5% of futures are subject to the appropriate oversight and regulatory requirements.

“No-Marketing” and the 5% Limitation

At the time the CFTC amended Rule 4.5, it also adopted Rule 4.13(a)(4) to provide an exemption to CPO registration if every natural person pool participant is a “qualified eligible person.”  The NFA argues that to the extent this exemption served as a reason to eliminate the “no marketing” and “5% trading test” from Rule 4.5, the CFTC should reexamine whether such reasoning is still valid.

When the CFTC amended these rules, it did so under the presumption that the qualifying entities, such as the mutual funds discussed in this article, were “otherwise regulated” and “may not need to be subject to any commodity interest trading criteria.”  But, the NFA is asserting that things have changed since the 2003 amendment and the rationale for the amendments is arguably no longer appropriate or valid.  Such registered investment companies that market themselves as a commodity pools or vehicles for trading in commodity futures or options to retail customers, who may be unsophisticated investors, or engage in more than 5% of non-hedging futures trading should be subject to the rules and regulations of the CFTC and NFA, the appropriate regulatory regime that protects customers participating in the commodity futures markets.

Comments by CFTC Commissioner

On September 1, 2010, CFTC Commissioner Scott O’Malia released a statement regarding the NFA petition which urged the CFTC to “expeditiously” move forward and adopt the NFA’s requested amendments.  The Commissioner stated:

Until the recent influx of new mutual funds specializing in futures trading, the use of the exclusion, in effect a form of regulatory arbitrage, was innocuous. However, continuing to allow FMFs to operate by evading CFTC oversight and its substantial disclosure obligations now poses increased risks to the market and to retail investors.

and

Without CFTC and NFA oversight, FMFs and other such funds that mimic CPOs, but do not abide by the same structure, will continue to avoid specific disclosures mandated for CPOs in the interest of consumer protection including: disclosures over fund risk exposure; performance returns; fee structures; and advisor conflict of interest information.

Future of Rule 4.5

It is clear that a new Rule 4.5 would be fiercely contested by current mutual fund managers who are investing in futures/commodities.  The big issue for managers will be an increase in start-up and compliance costs as well an increase in infrastructure requirements to comply with CFTC Regulations.  This will undoubtedly increase costs to mutual fund investors (and, the NFA argues, potentially increase investor protection).

However, nothing has happened yet.  Although the NFA asked the CFTC to amend the regulation, the CFTC will need to publish proposed amendments for public comment.  After receiving comments, the CFTC would be permitted to issue final regulations.  However, we do not think it is likely that the CFTC is going to focus its rule making (amending) efforts on issues that don’t fall under the Dodd-Frank act.  As the CFTC is under-resourced for this requirements of Dodd-Frank, it is unlikely to take up any outside initiatives over the next 9-12 months as they focus on other rule making efforts such as the OTC derivatives reform.

Other resources:

****

Other related hedge fund law articles:

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP provides comprehensive CFTC and NFA compliance and regulatory support for investment managers.  Bart Mallon, Esq. can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Hedge Fund Events September 2010

The following are various hedge fund events happening this month.  Please email us if you would like us to add your event to this list.

****

September 1-2

September 7-8

September 8-9

September 10

September 12

September 12

September 13-14

September 13-14

September 13-15

September 13-16

September 14

September 14

September 14

September 14-15

September 15

September 15-16

September 15-16

September 16

September 16

September 16

September 16-17

September 16-17

September 20-22

September 21

September 21

September 21-22

September 21-22

September 21-22

September 21-22

September 22

September 22-24

September 25

September 26-28

September 26-28

September 28-29

September 28

September 28

September 28

September 28-29

September 29

September 29

****

Bart Mallon, Esq. runs the hedge fund law blog and provides hedge fund registration and compliance services to hedge fund managers through Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP, a leading hedge fund law firm.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Hedge Fund Events August 2010

The following are various hedge fund events happening this month.  Please email us if you would like us to add your event to this list.

****

Aug 2-3

August 3

August 3

August 5

August 5

August 9-13

August 11

August 11

August 12

August 12

August 22

August 24

August 24-26

August 25-27

August 25-27

August 31 – September 1

August 31 – September 3

****

Bart Mallon, Esq. runs the hedge fund law blog and provides hedge fund registration and compliance services to hedge fund managers through Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP, a leading hedge fund law firm.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.

Commodity Position Limits After Dodd-Frank

CFTC to Establish Energy Position Limits

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Act”) includes a number of key provisions which will affect the investment management industry in important ways. For example, the Act includes a mandate for the CFTC to impose position limits across different markets, including the energy markets, the agricultural markets and with respect to trading in certain OTC derivatives. These new position limits must be implemented by CFTC orders or through rulemakings within the next six to nine months depending on the individual markets.

New CEA Section 4a(c)

The Act establishes new SEC Section 4a(c), portions of which we have reprinted below. Generally the new sections will require the CFTC to do the following:

  • establish limits on “exempt commodities” within 180 days of the passage of the Act. [The term “exempt commodity” is defined in CEA Section 1a(14) to generally include those commodities which are not financially based commodities and not agricultural commodities. Generally the import of this provision is to have the CFTC implement position limits on energy related commodities and futures.]
  • establish limits on agricultural commodities within 270 days of the passage of the Act.
  • establish the aggregate number or amount of positions in certain contracts based upon the same underlying commodity that may be held by any person, including any group or class of traders, for each month.

The above requirements are generally subject to “bona fide hedging” exemptions and the new Section 4a(c)(2) requires the CFTC to define what constitutes a bona fide hedging transaction.

* Please note the above is a broad generalization of the applicable new sections of the CEA

CFTC’s Previous Efforts to Set Energy Position Limits

To an extent, we will look to the CFTC’s prior efforts to see where they may land with respect to setting limits. In January 2010, the CFTC proposed position limits designed to prevent any one participant from developing a concentration of futures positions (see generally Federal Register Release 75 FR 4143). The proposed limits would have restricted the position energy traders could hold and addressed concerns many lawmakers had about the connection between those traders and rising energy prices. While the proposed limits only applied to four exchange-traded energy commodities (crude oil, natural gas, and two other types of fuel), the CFTC will be revisiting those efforts to meet the new, more expansive mandate under the Wall Street Reform Act. [Note: you can view previous comments from the public on this issue on the CFTC website.]  The CFTC will be working with other agencies, including the SEC, the Federal Reserve Board, and other regulators in its efforts.

Likely Impact

These mandates will have a significant impact on the energy futures market. In 2009, more than 377 million energy futures and options contracts were traded on CFTC-regulated exchanges and this number is anticipated to increase. Energy traders will now face position limits with respect to the energy contracts that were previously largely unregulated. In addition, it is important to note that under the Act, the CFTC can set position limits not only on persons, but also on any “group or class of traders”–which means it could apply a limit, for example, to all airlines in the aggregate. While we will not know the full impact for some time, when the limits are implemented there are likely to be some groups and individuals who will need to carefully monitor their positions.

****

New CEA Provisions

Section 4a(a)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act

‘‘(2) ESTABLISHMENT OF LIMITATIONS.—

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the standards set forth in paragraph (1) of this subsection and consistent with the good faith exception cited in subsection (b)(2), with respect to physical commodities other than excluded commodities as defined by the Commission, the Commission shall by rule, regulation, or order establish limits on the amount of positions, as appropriate, other than bona fide hedge positions, that may be held by any person with respect to contracts of sale for future delivery or with respect to options on the contracts or commodities traded on or subject to the rules of a designated contract market.

‘‘(B) TIMING.—

‘‘(i) EXEMPT COMMODITIES.—For exempt commodities, the limits required under subparagraph (A) shall be established within 180 days after the date of the enactment of this paragraph.

‘‘(ii) AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES.—For agricultural commodities, the limits required under subparagraph (A) shall be established within 270 days after the date of the enactment of this paragraph.

‘‘(C) GOAL.—In establishing the limits required under subparagraph (A), the Commission shall strive to ensure that trading on foreign boards of trade in the same commodity will be subject to comparable limits and that any limits to be imposed by the Commission will not cause price discovery in the commodity to shift to trading on the foreign boards of trade.

‘‘(3) SPECIFIC LIMITATIONS.—In establishing the limits required in paragraph (2), the Commission, as appropriate, shall set limits—

‘‘(A) on the number of positions that may be held by any person for the spot month, each other month, and the aggregate number of positions that may be held by any person for all months; and

‘‘(B) to the maximum extent practicable, in its discretion—

‘‘(i) to diminish, eliminate, or prevent excessive speculation as described under this section;

‘‘(ii) to deter and prevent market manipulation, squeezes, and corners;

‘‘(iii) to ensure sufficient market liquidity for bona fide hedgers; and

‘‘(iv) to ensure that the price discovery function of the underlying market is not disrupted.

Section 4a(a)(6) of the Commodity Exchange Act

‘‘(6) AGGREGATE POSITION LIMITS.—The Commission shall, by rule or regulation, establish limits (including related hedge exemption provisions) on the aggregate number or amount of positions in contracts based upon the same underlying commodity (as defined by the Commission) that may be held by any person, including any group or class of traders, for each month across—

‘‘(A) contracts listed by designated contract markets;

‘‘(B) with respect to an agreement contract, or transaction that settles against any price (including the daily or final settlement price) of 1 or more contracts listed for trading on a registered entity, contracts traded on a foreign board of trade that provides members or other participants located in the United States with direct access to its electronic trading and order matching system; and

‘‘(C) swap contracts that perform or affect a significant price discovery function with respect to regulated entities.

Section 4a(a)(7) of the Commodity Exchange Act

‘‘(7) EXEMPTIONS.—The Commission, by rule, regulation, or order, may exempt, conditionally or unconditionally, any person or class of persons, any swap or class of swaps, any contract of sale of a commodity for future delivery or class of such contracts, any option or class of options, or any transaction or class of transactions from any requirement it may establish under this section with respect to position limits.’’.

****

Other related hedge fund law articles:

Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP provides legal support and futures and commodities compliance services to all types of investment managers.  Bart Mallon, Esq. can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.